• Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    18 minutes ago

    More and more people are against giving kids internet access. Allow me to go against the grain:

    If your child is neurodivergent, or LGBTQ+, or any other form of misfit, then denying them internet access is tantamount to condemning them to social isolation. It wasn’t until I got unrestricted internet access, circa 17 years of age, that I realised that actually, no, I wasn’t a fucking alien, there were hundreds of thousands of people just like me, but I didn’t know because I was stuck in this shitty small town with shitty small town people. So I spent seventeen years thinking there was something fundamentally wrong with me when in reality there was something wrong with the environment around me.

    I would have had a much happier early life if I’d gotten internet earlier. Wouldn’t have spent 90% of my teens being suicidal.

  • mub@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Places of religious worship and formal teaching (e.g. churches, and Sunday schools) should be treated like bars and porn. You need to be an adult to access bars and porn because children do not fully understand what is happening or the consequences of being there. Churches (etc) are the same and there should be a legal age limit.

    It should also be socially unacceptable to talk about religious opinions in front of kids, just like most people don’t swear or talk dirty, etc.

    I agree with schools teaching kids “about” religions, just like sex and drugs. Teaching facts is good, preaching (aka indoctrination) is not.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t know if this is a hot take, but I think people need to stop basing their lives off of celebrities/influencers. We equate wealth with some hidden knowledge, when they’re just people. Sometimes really fucking stupid people who happen to have a profitable talent. Next time some tries to sell you something or teach you something, ask yourself if this person is even an authority/knowledgeable on what they’re talking about. I’ve gotten in the habit of mentally going “and you are?” when I get new information. Sometimes you find our that person is a leader in their field. Sometimes it’s just some terminally online teenager.

    Hotter Take: I think black people put too much stock in celebrities and what they’ll do for the black community. You don’t get freakishly wealthy being a sweetheart. Jay Z is not going to save us. And our blind loyalty has us supporting subpar performances and people because we “have to support” and it keeps fucking us over. No, I’m not supporting this business just because it’s black owned if the service/quality sucks (especially since black owned goods tend to be more expensive).

  • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Most drugs should be over-the-counter. The especially dangerous or addictive ones maybe just require counselling with a pharmacist first. But I’m more concerned about people not able to access the medication they need than I am about idiots removing themselves from the gene pool by OD.

    People in my dumbass country would rather 10 people with a genuine medical need suffer as long as 1 addict can’t get a fix, and it’s so many layers of bullshit.

    • Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If you think otc drugs are expensive now, waitl the scheduled narcotics find their way into the open market

      • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        there’s not really a way to know for sure but I imagine the price would actually come down somewhat due to removal of red tape and paperwork associated with drug control

        possibly also from increased competition if that made it easier for a drug manufacturer to begin producing previously controlled drugs

        for example amphetamine salt production is capped by the US DEA. if that cap were removed the supply would increase and the price might very well decrease

        sadly this is largely useless speculation

        • Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Personally i hope it stays that way. There are enough legal ways to lose ones mind and life

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Me tossing leftovers in the trash does not in any way interfere with hungry people getting food.

  • BurnSquirrel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Here’s one I get a lot of flack for that I don’t bring up much

    I think people trying to cook up gun control laws are targeting the wrong guns, in going after semi auto or military rifles, when they should be going after cheap handguns that have been available forever. The majority of gun deaths are suicides, and that’s almost always done with a hand gun, but even if you control for that the majority of homicides with guns are done with hand guns.

    Hand guns are usually relatively cheap. They are very easy to conceal. Its very common for people to walk into a bar with a holstered hand gun and make a series of bad decisions. Its too common for people to get in road rage incidents that escalate into something tragic because of a handgun in the glove box. People leave them around their house and treat them as toys that kids end up finding.

    AND I would argue that handguns are not in the spirit of the 2nd amendment. They are not fighting weapons. They are for fun, personal protection, or making people feel tough without having to do any real work. They have little range and lesser power. There are are no troops in the world that deploy with handguns as a primary weapon. US military officers get them but that’s more about tradition.

    Yes, I’m aware that shooting incidents done with rifles would be more deadly, but the fact there would be much fewer of them at all would be a net benefit in a society that banned or severely restricted hand guns.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Problem is that most of your anti-gun folk aren’t crazy, or don’t want to appear as such, and so they placate the defenders of gun rights with phrases resembling “I believe we should be able to have handguns because self defense buuuuuut nobody should have semi auto rifles.” Of course, the second they do ban long guns (curbing a total of 500/60,000 gun deaths a year mind you), they’ll switch to “oh well clearly that didn’t work so now we’re taking the handguns too.” It’s literally by design, simply a tactic to fool those who won’t bother looking into that whole “only 500 killed with long guns/yr” stat, nor the fact that 5.56 only delivers about as much energy as a hot .357mag rnd, but the Barrett .50BMG which is bolt action and therefore totally fine delivers about 10,000 more ft-lbs of energy, etc.

      Besides that, the 2a protects things “in common use” according to Heller and “must have a historical precedent for bans,” according to Bruen therefore handguns do fall quite under the scope of the 2a and a ban would be ruled unconstitutional immediately.

      Besides that, self defense is important, and unless you suggest people start open carrying ARs, the best way to do it is to CCW a compact 9mm handgun.

      Furthermore “guns shouldn’t be for the poor” would help to curb crime, but at what cost? That is pure T bona-fide classism and I don’t support it, personally.

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    @TehBamski Most entertainment is produced in abusive environments, promotes positively evil people to become famous, and twists the legal system through in such a way that it enables surveillance and erodes ownership rights. But barely anyone is willing to boycott it.

  • knightly@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    [Country] isn’t real, it was made up by [its founders] to [dodge taxes / dominate neighboring city-states / measure dicks with [Other Country]]

    • lseif@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      heh, just replace [Country] with [The Country I dont like] and you’ve got yourself a deal

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hot sauces should be required by law to list their Scoville range (SHU) on their packaging.

    • don@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fuckin facts, yo, I’m tired of searching up the sauce to try to get a gauge of wherever the fuck the sauce actually is, as opposed to its marketing wank wanting to convince me I’m chowing down on neutron star, despite it really being around room temp unflavored jello.

    • TehBamski@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      100% agree. I want to know whether I’m increasing, decreasing, or maintaining my heat threshold.

  • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The doomsday argument is correct, and becomes more obviously correct with each passing day.

  • therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tears of the Kingdom is a terrible game, it’s a mod of BOTW but with more ways to skip the exploration so you don’t get to memorize the map like in Elden Ring or Fallout.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s definitely a glorified DLC that was stretched into a whole game. The new things are mostly good but 80% is just exactly the same.

    • SandLight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure I exactly agree. I feel like it would be a better game than botw if I hadn’t already played botw. Still suffered from most of the same problems.

      Also the combat is so bad it encouraged you to avoid it whenever possible.

    • BurnSquirrel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I wouldn’t say terrible but mid possibly. It just took something that already worked well and added a little extra to it.

      If “thing2: the sequel” attaches a something kinda neato to the revolutionary, gaming landscape changing “thing1:the thingining” that doesn’t mean thing2 is really better than something that significantly moved the bar.

      This is why Fallout 3 is better than Fallout New Vegas and I will fight you all over it.