• drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think you should be allowed one sign on the building itself and a listing in some sort of directory and that’s it.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yea as much as we hate marketing it’s necessary to some degree for us to even know that things exist. How do you think new medications for yet untreated diseases get spread? Those companies pay a ton in marketing to get the meds out into the world and in the hands of doctors. Lots more people would be dying of stuff we have the cure for if they couldn’t advertise meds.

        Directories for specific products would be good though. If I need a kitchen gadget I can go to a directory of kitchen or food goods and look around. Between that and word of mouth we would be covered.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          you get one research paper too but the sample size of the study should be in the title.

  • Username@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    This is probably the best thing about lane assist on modern cars.

    When changing lanes without a turn signal, the wheel resists a bit.

    I have actually seen people I drove with be annoyed by it. I absolutely love it, because it is only annoying if you don’t use your turn signals.

    • sep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Suicide assist is horrible. Around here there is no middle of the road separator, to narrow road. So it tries to hit head first the traffic in the opposite way.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      This is probably the best thing about lane assist on modern cars.

      Absolutely not. It’s fucking dangerous. The one time I drove a rental like that, I went through a construction area downtown, and it tried to steer me right into a construction fence when I was following the yellow temporary construction lane markers that were going around the fenced off area.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          What if their arms are just really weak, you do have to turn the wheel slightly more than normal.

          • SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            If their arms are so weak as to be unable to overpower the lane-assist nudge, I really hope for everyone’s sake, that they are not behind the wheel of a moving vehicle. The ‘nudge’ isn’t strong in any sense of the word. You can overpower it with two fingers if squeezed tight. My semi truck had lane and steer assist, which nudged a little harder to steer the truck back into the lane, but that, too, could be overcome with a tight two-fingers grip.

    • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I disagree, it’s annoying in general.

      If I need to go around, say, a mail truck parked on the side of the road, the steering assist in our work van starts to rumble or shake or whatever it does. If there’s construction, you guessed it, it doesn’t understand that I have to cross over the line to continue driving, and if I have a turn signal on, the cop/worker directing traffic is going to expect me to go that way.

      If a car is driving in the opposite direction and starts to ride/cross the double yellow lines, me moving over causes the vehicle to resist and fight me, potentially putting me into an accident because I didn’t think to put my turn signal on in a split-second situation.

      My car should not be able to, idk what word I’m looking for, override me? People need to take driving more seriously and stop handing off their responsibilities to a computer system/sensor that can not only fail, but also doesn’t understand real world applications.

      • deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I love the lane assist on my car. It does resist me a little bit in the situations you describe, but it’s not a strong resistance. Just enough to get my attention if i do it by accident, but not enough to hinder me going where i need to go.

        Now i’m curious what the lane assist parameters look like for different makes and models…

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Mine works like yours, it’ll jottle me a bit but if I want the car to go there it goes there, I don’t need special efforts to make it happen. It also has the auto-brake thing in case you’re about to rear end someone and I’ve set it to high to see it working but even that I only managed to make it beep and flash but not actually brake yet, looks like it would only do it pretty late. I think most people complaining about this are having an “back in my days” moment tbh, but maybe there are indeed cars out there where the implementation is more invasive.

          • MrShankles@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            I drove a Honda Pilot with lane assist, and I hated how it jottled the steering wheel. It felt dangerous to me how much it resisted, even if it’s not really that much.

            I currently drive a Honda Fit with lane assist, and I love it. Literally use the lane assist every time. It beeps and has a warning on the dash about leaving the lane, and maybe it even has the same amount of resistance, but it feels a lot safer/natural

            I think I just don’t like the steering wheel “rumbling/jottling” or whatever, because it’s like a false tactile feedback. I’m sure I could adjust to it, but it’s not the best implementation imo

            Also, the auto-brake thing (is amazing and should be standard) doesn’t come on until you are wildly close (and the distance that it engages, seems to be speed dependent). So you’ll really only see it engage if you’re about to be in a wreck, or you’re really ballsy trying to “test it”

  • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    My car makes it slightly difficult to change lanes if I don’t signal, some resistance on the steering wheel and a warning beep beep beep that I’m “drifting.” There are some terrible roads around here that confuse the sensors so I do a bit of steering wheel arm wrestling now and then just to keep going straight.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      That is why I turned lane assist off after a dozen false positives that felt like the car was going to steer me into danger with no benefits.

      Parking assist got turned off when parking in a garage set off a cacophony.

      • whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        It was when I was holding leftmost lane position passing a semi and it beeped and tried to steer me into said semi that I decided it can fuck off for ever lol

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        How strong is the lane assist in your car? If I was weak enough to even be bothered by the lane assist in my car, I’d figure it was time to stop driving. It certainly has never come close to overriding my steering.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Ever drive on a construction zone where they’ve started to rip up pavement and half the lane is an inch higher than the other half? Ever change lanes into that lane, and feel the steering fight you or lurch as you cross that lip?

          The problem isn’t the strength needed to overcome the lane assist. It’s easy to fight it. The problem comes when you know you are well centered in the lane. But, all the sudden, you’re being pushed left or right, and you have to quickly determine whether you’re feeling uneven pavement. Or maybe a tie rod end or a ball joint has some slop in it. Maybe the power steering pump is leaking and running dry. Or, maybe the fucking lane assist thinks a strip of tar in the middle of the lane is a lane marker, and it wants me to cross the centerline.

          The problem isn’t whether or not I can take it in a fair fight. The problem is that it throws a punch.

          • NABDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            Well, that’s kind of what I’m saying. That’s insane. In my truck I wouldn’t even describe the lane assist as a nudge. It’s just barely enough to be perceivable. Certainly nothing that’s going to make me question anything other than if I’m over the line.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              You’ve become conditioned to consider a “nudge” to be lane assist helpfully pushing on the steering wheel, to move you toward the center of the lane. Your muscle memory reacts to such a nudge by accepting it, allowing it.

              30 years of driving has conditioned me to consider a “nudge” to be an indication that something is pushing on the car, moving me away from where I intend to be. My muscle memory reacts to such a nudge by immediately arresting that push and reversing it.

              • NABDad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                No, I haven’t been conditioned into anything. 38 years of driving taught me to be able to tell what is happening because I’m aware of the road. I know I didn’t just drive off the edge of the road, because I know where the road is and I know where my tires are.

                I’ve had lane assist in my truck for 2 years and I learned what it feels like. However, it’s clear that different manufacturers implemented it differently. All I can say is, it appears Honda got it right.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        In my experience, lane assist is pretty good on the highways, and actively terrible everywhere else.

        The only “feature” I hated more than lane assist was hill start assist. Chirped my tires, or stalled completely, on every fucking hill.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Do you have trouble staying in your lane on the highway?

          That’s the easiest place to stay in a lane.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            Lane assist seems to agree with you. It is only able to do its job on the highway. Elsewhere, it actively seeks head-on collisions.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              Its job is apparently making up for lazy people who can’t pay attention to the multi ton vehicle they are driving.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Motherboard front panel connectors should be officially standardized. These fucking things have been basically the same since the 90s, but we still have to line up all the individual wires instead of having one plug.

    Oh, and fix RGB headers while we’re at it. They’re the flimseist fucking thing, and you shouldn’t be able to use a 4 pin plug on a three pin header.

    • HeckGazer@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Also modular power supplies while we’re at it thanks. 20 years and the cables still can’t be reused/you have to remanage the whole damn case when doing a swap

      • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        That’s already a thing? I have several power supplies that have completely detachable cables allowing the psu to be swapped directly. Not sure how standardised the psu side of the cable is between manufacturers, but this does exist in some form.

        • lemmynparty@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          They’re talking about standardisation. Unfortunately, many manufacturers use different pinouts on the psu side. Sometimes they’re identically shaped but have the polarity reversed, or 12v on a 5v rail. Pure evil…

  • Darohan@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    The more properties you own, the more tax you pay on the price of the next one - excluding if you only own one, but escalating quickly after like 3 or 4.

    • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      This is so obviously what needs to happen. The fact that it hasn’t says everything you need to know about current governments.

    • chimasterflex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Serious question, couldn’t you bypass this by just setting up different LLCs that only have one or two properties under them?

      • Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        They already do this. In my old job, the boss had 0 properties, he just used company money, company cars etc and had multiple of them

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Texas is that way to a point. Your primary residence gets enormous tax breaks. Any property after that, fuck you, pay up. The downside to that is that it contributes to the high cost of rent as the owner passes it along to the tenant.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Does it increase per property owned though? They can’t keep passing on the tax increase to the tenant if at a certain point they own 1000 houses and now their tax on the last one is 7 times higher than the rent on it.

        That’s what we should be doing any house after your second gets increased a ton per house. Make it untenable for people to own rental properties. I don’t mind someone having a vacation house or two if they can afford it. But nobody needs 10 vacation houses, they’re rental or investment properties at that point so fuck them.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Always puzzled me, let’s say the dude behind failed the check and hit your car, what the hell did you gain from this?

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        At least in the US, a lot of fault hinges on rear impact. Not worth a damn, however, with how many dashcams people have now. These idiots still try though.

        • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Fun fact, in a lot of states even if they slam the brakes if you hit them you are still at fault. You should have been at a safe following distance, and no one knows what that actually means. People will argue that a distance of less than 2 seconds is totally fine and safe because they do it all the time. But a safe following distance means that at your current speed of travel if the car in front of you came to an impossibly instantaneous stop you should have time to notice and stop without hitting them.

          At freeway speeds this is a minimum of 4 seconds following distance in dry condition. As in when the back of their car passes a sign that you should be able to start counting Mississippi’s and not reach that sign with the front of your car for at least 4 Mississippi’s

          Now, if they come up from behind you swerve over and then instantly slam on the brakes obviously you’re fine(if you have a dash cam) there was nothing you could have done, but if you have just been riding their ass and then they slam on the brakes? You’re totally a fault as far as the law in many states is concerned

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      The turn signal mechanism would still work even if the bulb was out.

      This is still not really workable, but that wouldn’t be the problem.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Instantaneous, lifelong driving bans for any driver who is found to be texting or intoxicated behind the wheel.

    • Persen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I respectfully disagree. People, who depend on cars for their job would lose the license and their job, making them drink more.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        You spectacularly missed the point of DUI law. Society couldn’t give two shits if someone is drinking themselves to an early grave. It’s when they endanger other people that it becomes an issue. That’s why it’s driving under the influence, not existing.

        Many countries will judge a DUI induced kill a murder, because the person who chooses to drink and drive knows that killing someone is a probable outcome and chose to do it anyway.

      • philipsdirk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I respectfully disagree. People that cannot bring up the discipline to drive sober and keep their attention on the road, even if their jobs would depend on it, shouldn’t have the privilege of being allowed to operate a machine that can easily kill when making a mistake or misjudgment.

      • stormeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Agreed, and I respectfully disagree with everyone else replying to you.

        Relying on your car for your job is a much wider criterion than driving as your job. In car-centric places like the US (outside of the big cities) that’s probably 99% of the population. Couple that with the piss poor social safety net and losing your license literally means starvation.

        This still doesn’t mean I endorse or agree with people driving distracted in any way. If revoking someone’s license meant removing them from the road but not destroying their life, I would do that in a heartbeat.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Now that would make about 95% of all BMW drivers wonder why their steering is broken…

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s such a lib solution. “Let’s make sure guns are inaccessible except to rich people”.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      That sounds like it would be a good idea, but there is a strange but significant cadre of right-wing Star Trek fans. I think they just pay attention to the pew pew space battles and ignore everything else or something.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I honestly see why. While I love star trek, it has a very strong power structure “with the right people in power”, as if power itself wouldn’t corrupt people. The admirals may not always be right in the beginning but they accept their wrongs and have no bad intentions and the heroes are always celebrated by the establishment.

        This can be understood as “this is the perfect world where even authorities are good” or as “I told you, authorities are the good guys”. I, as a left libertarian, prefer Farscape (and still watch every star trek show)

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Exactly! The TOS/TNG era are “benevolent authoritarianism” and conservatives, of course, see themselves as the good guys. “If things only went our way, our society would be perfect, just like Star Trek!”

          I think Edington said it best. Paraphrasing, “[The Federation] are even worse than the Borg. At least they tell you about their plans for assimilation. You’re more insidious you assimilate people I think they don’t even know.”

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              They’re the OG libertarians. The right explicitly stole the term and celebrated doing so.

              In short, they’re a branch of anarchism.

                • lugal@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  I wouldn’t call it a spinoff but rather a ripoff. There might be few parallels but basically left Libertarians are against all hierarchies, including the state. Right Libertarian are against the state and want to build state like structures but privatized.

  • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    If you own a house with nobody living in it, you gotta pay rent to the state each month for the privilege of keeping it empty.

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      They do this in India. You’re allowed 2 homes, 3rd onwards you have to pay Income tax for deemed rent received if it’s empty.

      • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        But they mean specifically a vacancy tax. So anyone who owned vacant property would have a large additional payment or get it rented

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        No, like market rate for the property. Everyone pays property tax, regardless of whether the property is vacant or occupied.

        • Nick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          My dad inherited my grandma’s ancient house recently and is practically forced to find a way to remodel it to be rentable because there is a imputed rental value tax where I’m from.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            What’s the alternative, just leave it empty?

            I would think it could also be acceptable to transfer ownership to a relative who doesn’t already own a home. It just seems like a waste to have a house with nobody living in it while so many people are unhoused.

  • Ydna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I have a GM vehicle with lane tracking, and this is actually kinda how it works! The steering wheel will mildly fight you unless you activate the signal, then BAM you merge right over. It reminds me of an AT-field

  • Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Imagine a kid runs out on the road suddenly… What a dumb fucking idea!

    • oxomoxo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      The smarter version of this idea is the turn signal comes on automatically in the direction you turn.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s not. The point of a turning signal is to give a warning to fellow drivers in advance. Turning it on right when you’re turning is way too late. Just learn to drive properly for fucks sake!