• AbsentBird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    If you own a house with nobody living in it, you gotta pay rent to the state each month for the privilege of keeping it empty.

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      They do this in India. You’re allowed 2 homes, 3rd onwards you have to pay Income tax for deemed rent received if it’s empty.

      • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        But they mean specifically a vacancy tax. So anyone who owned vacant property would have a large additional payment or get it rented

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        No, like market rate for the property. Everyone pays property tax, regardless of whether the property is vacant or occupied.

        • Nick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          My dad inherited my grandma’s ancient house recently and is practically forced to find a way to remodel it to be rentable because there is a imputed rental value tax where I’m from.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            What’s the alternative, just leave it empty?

            I would think it could also be acceptable to transfer ownership to a relative who doesn’t already own a home. It just seems like a waste to have a house with nobody living in it while so many people are unhoused.