• Johanno
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well then make Premium a reasonable price.

      And just don’t provide stuff for free. Nobody forces alphabet to provide youtube without account and for free.

      It was a money sink since Google created it

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    10 hours ago
    1. Get a job working for Google making anti-adblockers.

    2. Use your 20% time contributing to FOSS stealth adblocker and anti-anti-adblockers.

    3. ???

    4. Profit for life

  • Thoven@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Cards on the table: for Google money I’d do it too. If they want to enshittify their product until the competition has a fighting chance, who am I to stop them? Sure, it’s an annoying and anticonsumer thing to do. But making a “free” product’s bad qualities harder to circumvent isn’t the ethical hill I’m going to die on.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I would take the job just to make sure we can sabotage it. And I’m not even affected by their adblocker detection; I just yt-dlp and NewPipe the videos.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      14 hours ago

      But, who’s their competitor? They have none. All the other alternative have very specific community (artsy short film, science, etc)

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For Google money I’d do it too…but I wouldn’t do a very good job of it

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah, I don’t really get the argument here. As much as it sucks, it’s not nearly as morally reprehensible as something like weapons. If you don’t do it someone else will. It’s not something a handful of devs are gonna make a difference in by boycotting and it isn’t worth being fired over or not accepting a job over.

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Advertising is absolutely morally reprehensible. It is propaganda that exists only to manipulate people into buying shit they didn’t want or need. And it turns out that mindless consumerism is destroying society and our planet.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            I never said it wasn’t morally reprehensible. Only that it’s less morally reprehensible than something like making weapons.

  • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I would accept “I work for the team that tries to detect ad blockers on YouTube, and slow down the process with bureaucracy.”

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      colleague of the marketing guy that just makes up metrics to pretend to his boss and stakeholders that their work on ads makes any difference

      laudable professionals

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is the ideal tech worker. You may not like it, but this is what peak technology looks like.