Please don’t think I’m here to complain about rizz or skibidi toilet etc. Thats all fine by me.

The term I dislike strongly is ‘eeeh’ before you make a statement disagreeing with someone. (This is over text only). Now maybe I’ve been pavloved bc it’s always used by someone disagreeing. But I’m happy with people disagreeing with me normally its just the ‘eeeh’ or ‘erm’ that annoys me.

So what’s a random term that annoys you?

PS. Saying “eeeh actually ‘eeh’ is a perfectly fine term” would be a ridiculously easy joke and I will judge you for making it. And I know atleast one person will. Especially bow that I’ve said all this.

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Not specifically a word, but i hate when people mix english with their native language

    Its especially worse when they use words that are nearly identical

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I recently heard someone say after they almost accidentally went in a wrong building entrance, “Good thing I didn’t do that or I would regret my life choices.

    A bit much for something minor that created no more than two seconds of awkwardness.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Beloved” in so many articles. Yes I tend to use a specific browser. No, it is not and never will be “beloved”.

    That word is so jarring most of the time and seems to be everywhere online in the last two years. I can only assume it’s some sort of SEO, trying to convince Google it’s a personal article or something. I hope to god it’s not ai assuming that’s what attracts our attention

  • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “It is what it is.”

    It is lazy, circular, a cop out and means next to nothing. Vague enough to pass as a wise quip, to some. It is not.

    Also not so much a saying per sé, but people who use quotes of famous people at the bottom or ends of emails. As if that implies a personality. If you are going to use something you think sounds smart, at least try to come up with that something yourself.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This one is mine too. It’s used in a way that can give it more meaning (mainly, this is something out of our control), but logically the phrase is just corpo filler-speak that means absolutely nothing.

  • M. Orange@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Kiddos, especially when used by people in professions that work with kids. Right up there with people who unironically say pupper or doggo. Just say kids.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      I’m also sick of it, but I also sort of like how it’s gone viral. I had a very non-techy friend mention it to me the other day. I feel like most of the people who I see talking about it are jazzed because it makes them feel seen. My friend, for example, said to me that before she learned of “enshittification”, she felt like she was going mad because of how things don’t seem to work like they used to, especially in tech; she said that for the longest time, she had assumed it must be something that she was doing wrong.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Marxists have a hundred years of text dedicated to alienation from labor, the falling rate of profit, degeneration of art and creative disciplines under later capitalism due to the profit motive, cycles of class struggle, all based on a materialist analysis of changing production and class relationsi

      But for some reason a trendy term like enshittification that vaguely means things are getting worse, without going into the basis about why they’re currently getting worse, has caught on.

      I’m convinced it’s part of the tech grifter trend to take things that were already invented, slap a new name on it, repackage it, and sell it.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But yet it explains so much about the modern world. All this time we’ve been abused and mistreated, had our data collected and income extracted in so many scammy ways …… and now we have a word that fits it so perfectly

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The exception that proves the rule.

    People use it in a way where counterexample proofs that the rule exist when it’s supposed to mean that the rule also handles exceptional cases.

    • gerryflap@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Oh yeah absolutely. I’m a programmer and I see so many companies and recruiters etc use Cyber instead of Cybersecurity. It drives me absolutely mad, but these type of people drive me mad anyways. It’s probably the same crowd who ruined AI by overhyping it into its grave, the same crowd who were hyped by web 3.0 and the whole Blockchain craze, and probably all those other dumb crazes before it.

      Still, this cyber thing seems to permeate everything, and I’ve heard people using the term who I otherwise respect. For me it’s a quick way to instantly become very sceptical of whatever follows the term

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The replacement of the term “conspiracy theory” with just “conspiracy”.

    That’s two different things. If we equate the two semantically we can’t discuss them.

  • dirtbiker509@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Please do the needful.

    This one really grinds my gears! I think it’s because the person can’t even be bothered to describe what they want you to do, just go fix it and don’t bother me with any details.

    • Brahvim Bhaktvatsal@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      isiZulu
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Indian here. Redditors say that Indians say this a lot. I’d like to tell you that while Indians do use this sentence, it’s almost always placed only after a long, somewhat-gone-off-tangent-in-some-places conversation that explained everything well.

      Maaaaaaybe it was to convince you without describing tasks, but… mostly, it’s not so.

      Also, I don’t remember hearing it IRL at all. Just felt like I have heard it at least twice in my 18 years of humaning around.

      • klemptor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        But why use such an awkward construction? Why not “please handle this” or “please take care of this”? Or even “please take the necessary steps to address this”? “Please do the needful” is saying Please [VERB] the [ADJECTIVE]. But the correct construction is to verb a noun. So you need a noun (e.g., “this”) to act on.

        And additionally, “needful” is an adjective, and rarely ever used anyway. For example, you could probably describe a homeless person as “needful”, but it sounds awkward, and most people would say “needy” or “in need.”