• poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ugh, what a shit article. It mentions exactly one model, a Dacia, that has been already on the market for some time, and a Renault prototype coming maybe in 2026. There is nothing like what the headline suggests as far as I can tell.

    • Phineaz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Thanks, I was afraid I had missed a wave of new releases of German car makers finally getting of their arses - not that I’d mind, but no, they didn’t.

      • Luccus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        SUVs, anyone?

        No?

        We also have crossover SUVs.

        Maybe a SUV mixed with a coupé?

        Still no?

        How about a Combi mixed with a SUV?

        Our cheapest option?

        That’ll be 30.000€.

        Electric? No. That one isn’t electric.

        For that you’ll have to upgrade to our eSUV.

        Why… why are you leaving?

        • magikmw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Me in a dealership: shitty sedans and suvs. Oh, what’s that? I left in a minivan.

  • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Very interesting. I wonder how those manufacturers are planning to make these cars cheaper? Do they just have a smaller battery, or do they go with LFP instead of NMC or NCA?

    • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      probably buying batteries from china, since there is no one even close to competitve with them, like BYD’s Blade battery. And then competing on everything else, for example by cutting down on all the superfluous crap they put in to massively overinflate car prices over the last 20 years.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Renault has been doing the Zoe at roughly this price point for about a decade already, although there was a monthly lease on the battery so there’s an ongoing cost. I see quite a few of them going around here, though they’re not a huge presence. They’re simple but pleasant on the inside

        • cron
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Not really. It is clearly a thing of the past, when batteries were expensive and not as reliable as today. Don’t forget that the zoe was released 10 years ago.

  • Jayjader@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Good. Much better than that auto exec who was suggesting tariffs on imported EV vehicles would be needed to “save” Europe. I want to say it was BMW but that might just be my own bias against them speaking.

    • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Hasn’t musk been losing traction in this game for a while now anyway? My understanding is that Tesla’s whole initial selling point was that they disrupted the market and made electric vehicles something that people would want to buy, whilst the other automakers were ‘technically’ making EVs but making them look awful to keep the fuel industry alive.

      Other automakers have woken up to the demand now and are making nice EVs. Unless Tesla can do something innovative that actually works consistently they’re probably going to phase out.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        made electric vehicles something that people would want to buy

        *people who were considering whether they wanted a Porsche or a Landrover. Selling Teslas to people who had $80,000 dollars to blow in 2015 is orthogonal wide adoption of EVs.

        the other automakers were ‘technically’ making EVs

        It’s worse than that. California passed a law requiring the big automakers offer a non-fossil fuel vehicle. Most companies stuck electric or hydrogen motors in existing cars to make cheap garbage that technically met the requirements. GM spent half a billion developing the EV1. They released for lease-only in 1996 with a 160 mile range. They estimated a starting MSRP of $34,000 by 1999.

        The customers loved them. Then California got rid of the law. And GM canceled the program. Thousands of customers sent checks trying to buy the cars. GM proceeded to revoke all leases, crush the cars, and sell the battery technology to Chevron.

    • cron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It doesn’t appear that Musk is interested in cheap electric cars. My guess is that the M3 is the smallest Tesla for a while.

  • jenesaisquoi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Where are the batteries made? Where does the lithium for them come from?

    I’d hate to buy a greener car that is actually not.

    • Teppichbrand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      EV Bullshit Bingo from 2018 called, it wants it’s argument back

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      No matter the source and even if you get electricity produced using coal, the car is better for the environment after less than 50k miles

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Sodium batteries are coming, and lithium batteries can be recycled so a lesser evil I guess.