![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/282c379c-7e70-43db-81d3-c50a0e47f1cc.png)
deleted by creator
Oh lord not another crowd of hell demons!
I was hoping he’d turn her into Ryan gosling tbh.
It’s cool to not get in the way when people are trying to take a picture, but it’s also fine if you do. After all you’re in a public place.
you could search for the wiki or a forum and get the same information chatgpt is pulling without the impact.
True, depending on the quality of the wiki/forum. I would then also often find myself defaulting back to Google to find the right page on the wiki/forum, just with the name of the forum included to narrow down my search.
That or I’d never find the exact bit of info I need because it’s buried in hours worth of reading on the wiki.
Weren’t the penguins from a zoo in the US though? It’s been a while since I saw the film.
I guess it adds up to 12 searches worth of environmental impact with chatgpt+Google (10 searches worth from chatgpt, 2 from Google)
When I use Google alone it’s often the same as that if not more. Sometimes it’s less if I already know the subject matter, but in those scenarios I would usually give just Google a go first anyway.
Basically chatgpt often either gives me the answer or a much better starting place for what to Google.
My scenario is that I use chatgpt to get context and terminology in the area I’m researching.
I then know how to do more specific Google searches (only 1/2).
I think his stepdaughter, with her boyfriend, dropped off his son for the son’s weekend visit with him (him being the commenter, the father).
It reads like his son was visiting his stepdaughter’s boyfriend. Maybe it is that, but it’d be odd.
I’m not sure what point you’re making.
The environmental impact is interesting, if an AI search being as environmentally impactful as 10 Google searches is true.
I don’t know about you, but it often takes a number of Google searches for me to find the right information, whereas with AI and Google combined I usually get the info I need in 1/2 Google searches.
That means that, based on my personal experience, AI is probably more environmentally efficient at getting me the correct info than google search alone.
Edit: gotta love downvoters that give no discussion. I’m happy to re-evaluate the above but if nobody is rebuking it then all I can assume is that downvoters are ‘AI BAD’ folks who don’t have any intelligent input.
I can see where they’re coming from, sure. But assuming something with no proof doesn’t make any sense, to me at least.
I just found it such an odd thing to make an assumption over.
So this boils down to, these products are more expensive now that sanctions are in place, because middlemen are needed to circumvent the sanctions.
That translates to sanctions working exactly as intended right? It doesn’t matter if they still get the product as long as it’s costing them a lot more than it would before sanctions.
Why? The worlds richest people aren’t royal, so why would the UKs richest person need to be?
I mean it’s whether it’s Ukraine, Israel, or the pockets of those in power, it definitely isn’t going towards improving the US internally. At least with Ukraine it goes to something other than a genocidal maniac or 3rd pool at mansion number 4.
I’m new to the game and this happened to me for the first time the other day.
I really panicked but then luckily I had a scroll that cleared them quite easily.
Probably just rishi trying to secure some right wing votes for the election later in the year.