idk man I just need to vent i guess

my employer “provides” health insurance in exchange for my time and labor, and for that great privilege they take $600 out of my paycheck every month (covers me, my wife, and our 1yo son)

that’s half our monthly mortgage payment; it’s 2/3 our monthly grocery bill

why?

  • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    10 days ago

    Your employer is likely paying another $600/mo for you as well, and singles/couples working for the company are actually subsiding your threesome.

    The insurer-first system a stupid scheme that shouldn’t exist in the first place.

  • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    In the US during WW2 employers couldn’t keep employees because of wage competition. This made war production extremely inefficient and slow. The War Labor Board instituted wage ceilings for critical jobs. But, they allowed employers to compete with health benefits. Employment and healthcare became intertwined.

    After WW2 the War Labor Board was dissolved and wage ceilings removed. FDR, who’d proposed and implemented The New Deal and led us through WW2, proposed the Second Bill of Rights aka the Economic Bill of Rights:

    • Employment

    • An adequate income for food, shelter, and recreation

    • Farmers’ rights to a fair income

    • Freedom from unfair competition and monopolies

    • Decent housing

    • Adequate medical care

    • Social security

    • Education

    This would’ve disaccociated employment and medical care. However, FDR was labeled a socialist and authoritarian, demonized. We the People bought into the propaganda.

    That’s how it’s been for eighty years: The leftists propose the same platform FDR did. And, they’re told to shut up for disturbing the idiots running in fear of one bad choice or another. All that’s changed is the efficiency and effectiveness of the hegemony’s propaganda.

    • insufferableninja@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      big government guy proposed big government solution to unintended consequence of bad decisions by big government, is confused when people don’t want more big government meddling.

      the real problem here is that people forgot about what the issue was and how it happened, and years later are clamoring for government to “do something”. and extra unfortunately, at this point it may be too late for any solution other than letting government just take control of all of it; i can’t see any other way to get all the shitty government decisions and interventions rolled back.

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        The US incarnation of capitalism has obviously failed. I’m all for revolution. But, I’ve no doubt that the vast majority of society would willingly give up their freedom, once again. Humans have been doing the same thing for millennia.

  • laverabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    If you make less than $103,000 / year (family of 3) and pay more than 9.5% of your household gross income on healthcare premiums, you will likely save thousands by using your state’s healthcare marketplace. You are likely eligible because they fixed the family glitch, now the 9.5% applies to the cost for family rather than individual coverage as before.

    Although the subsidies will likely end after 2025 if dems don’t retain a majority in house/senate.

    It could easily save you thousands of dollars a year… Like I’m 100% of it… Ask me how I know, lol. Please look into it. I think you have to wait til open enrollment in December? or when your healthcare renews annually. You might be able to do it immediately due to “hardship”. I don’t know the specifics of your situation but I’m pretty sure you and a lot of other people here would save a lot of money. I would talk with a healthcare_gov or your state agency agent, they get paid by the gov’t to help you through it at no cost to you. You can also get a low HDHP and get your own HSA to essentially pay no taxes for medical expenditures. I hear fidelity is good, due to no fees.

    Speaking of which, is there an active financial advice community on Lemmy (like that old site that should not be named) like /c/financialplanning or something like that?

    • laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I realize I’m in /c/antiwork so it goes without saying it’d be nice if we have universal healthcare without all this baloney money being siphoned to these criminal insurance companies. Just trying to help anyone out in a similar situation. ;)

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Incredibly helpful information. You don’t need to preface for a shitty situation you did not create or have the power to control. You’ve your part by providing care and empathy in the form of advice that might help some of us.

        We got to use what we got for now. Can’t survive on wishes and wants.

  • Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 days ago

    The private insurance industry is going to price themselves out of existence eventually. People are going to realize they can save an enormous amount of money by having the government act as payer for their healthcare instead of corporations trying to turn a profit. Healthcare already does not lend itself to distribution via capitalism, you don’t show up to the ED and wave money around to bid on your bed. It should be based on need.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      Still waiting for that. Been my hope since I went on this $250-500 a month health insurance journey during my first job in 2005.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 days ago

      Insurance numbers in the US are all made up bullshit numbers designed to funnell money from the working class to the rich.

  • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 days ago

    “You should be grateful, peasant. That’s a good looking kid you got there. It would be a shame if she got sick. What were you saying, again, I just got a notice about a stock price increase.”

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    As an employer I would LOVE to be shed of this system. I have no reason to be involved in the health care of my employees, and given the state of health care in America there is literally no upside for my business. It’s all bad.

    Unfortunately our system requires it, though. If I didn’t offer health care and instead just increased the base salary I wouldn’t be competitive. People would think I was trying to pull a fast-one on them, and few people in America know how to get health care on their own. It’s a mess.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      Our “lords” have already told us why things are the way they are if you look at the “reasoning” behind why the Senate let the child tax credits expire.

      “People wouldn’t have an incentive to work.”

      They literally use healthcare to chain you to a job. I have 3 coworkers that I know of off hand that have all said they literally are only working here for the health insurance…

      This system can go to hell.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        “People wouldn’t have an incentive to work.”

        That is just their attempt at rationalization. The real reason is much simplier: money, money, money. Lobbyists, Super PACs and the donor class own our politicians. The rich pay for their political campaigns and bribe our politicians in some interesting and creative ways. For example, giving a politician a million directly is illegal, but if he writes a book and then you have the SuperPAC buy a million copies of the politicians book that is somehow legal.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Can PACs accept foreign money? Or does a politician have to run a little SPAC scam to accept that?

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        “People wouldn’t have an incentive to work.”

        As someone who lives in a place with universal healthcare, I would like to tell these people that many people here still work.

        You know, food and shelter are also good incentives.

        • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Hell, luxuries are all that are needed to work. If all my basic needs were taken care of I would still work because I like to travel and drink.

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well the problem is that you are viewing it from a “normal person” vantage… you need to think of your employees as indentured servants, basically slaves you don’t get to actually whip.

      Once you get the proper Capitalist vantage point, you realize you can use this “benefit” to squeeze the life out of your employees, specially any of them with Chronic conditions or just a family, as they are hostages to the Health Care you provide!

    • UFO@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Extra painful that the current system is biased towards large employers. Easier to absorb that overhead if the business is large.

      • Subverb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s right. For a company greater than 50 employees the insurance companies charge a group rate that is the same for everyone. Fewer than 50 and each employee is billed on their and/or their family’s merits.

        Because I have fewer than 50 employees, most of my family employees use their spouse’s insurance from larger company than mine. And there’s little I can do about it.

        For my small business I’m just as screwed over as the employee. If I hire a guy I can’t (and don’t want to) ask him him or her health questions, but because I pay half of my employee’s insurance I’m hiring with an unknown cost component. That employee might have a costly pre-existing condition for all I know.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 days ago

    Best thing that ever happened to me was almost dying. Now all of my healthcare, everything, is taken care of.

    That’s how fcked the world is.

  • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 days ago

    This is madness. Where I’m from, we have a nationalised healthcare system and yet my employer offers private healthcare coverage for no additional cost to myself (free)!

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        You’re dumb as a rock. And so is the yurobro.

        In those European countries the employee often costs 20-30% more than their stated salary.

        There’s absolutely no such thing as “my employer gives me extra insurance free of charge”. It’s not free. They’re paying for it.

        As I worked for a small startup I know all the numbers. I received X gross on paper, the company had expenses of 1.2X, and I got 0.6X on my bank account. Oh boy, gotta love those “free” health insurances, unemployment benefits, paid sick days etc.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      That’s wonderful. Where is this, if it’s not too personal, if it is, no worries.

        • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          Private health care is very different in the UK. If you’re ever in serious ill health, or need anything remotely risky private healthcare will tell you to go to the NHS. It’s mostly GPs with nicer offices and NHS consultants moonlighting.

  • leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    i get the feeling that society really doesnt want to spend the money to give people healthcare.

    • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      It’s 2 fold, one party doesn’t want to takeaway private insurance because of the donor money. The other doesn’t want “inferior” people to get health care.

      A double edge sword unfortunately.

    • LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well, at least here in the USA, we already are spending the money. Getting worse results than the rest of the world and spending more money on it. Because private health insurance is a joke and we’re all the punchline.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Most Americans want universal healthcare. The problem is that we have a broken and corrupt system where our politicians are bought and owned by the donor class and lobbyists

  • 0p3r470r@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s bullshit, but your employer may be covering your insurance almost completely and that 600 goes toward your family. At least that’s how my insurance works. Again still bullshit that health care costs that much and then they won’t cover shit when you need it.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Universal healthcare would probably not cost you that much with taxes. But instead a private company gets to reap all the benefits of your money.

  • SameOldInternet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    Insurance is extra expensive when you have a family in the US. I’m single and my monthly cost is less than $100 a month. Having a family is more expensive for everything.

  • Kethal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    The fact that insurance is provided through employers in the US is strange. Other products are purchased directly. Presumably there’s some advantage a sort of collective bargaining, but it doesn’t seem to work out that way for this, in part because the employees aren’t really part of the bargaining and in many places employees needs are too diverse to reach am agreement that works well for everyone.

    Better solutions aren’t coming any time soon. You can possibly make some better choices though. Although, not participating in the health insurance is borderline line crazy, dental and vision plans don’t make sense for a lot of people. I would pay more for my dental plan than I pay to visit a dentist, including two annual cleanings, periodic x-rays, and infrequent work like cavities - basically the care you need to maintain tooth health. I don’t get the dental plan. You can figure out your own out of pocket costs and see if a dental plan works for you. Going to a dentist that is not in an insurance network is the way to go when doing this. Offices in network are required by the insurance company to charge exorbitant fees to out-of-network customers (the dentists don’t get the same pay from the insurance company though). So say a normal dentist charges $200 for a cleaning. A dentist in a network would be required to charge $400 or something nuts. If a patient is in network, it will say $400 on the EOB, and that the customer is responsible for $50, making it look like the customer saved $350. The insurance company only gives the dentist $150 though, so the dentist gets $200 anyway, the customer really only saved $150. The insurance company gets a bunch of money in annual fees from the employer.

    You can see if it makes sense for you. Not everyone will be in the same situation, and maybe it doesn’t eork out. If you have an option for an FSA or something similar, this option is even more attractive, since all those expenses can be paid from untaxed income, whereas the money taken out of your paycheck to cover insurance is after tax I believe.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      Good point about dental costs. But insurance is just that, a plan in case you need more than the usual care, so paying a bit more might be worth it.

      However, dental insurance specifically I feel is a racket, as it seems the more costly the procedure, the less percentage you get covered. When major dental costs are cheaper to fly to other countries and get them done than to use insurance in the US, something is wrong. I haven’t gotten my issues taken care of for years because I ran into that roadblock where I simply can’t afford to pay “my share”, even though I pay in plenty to the family coverage for everyone else.

      FSA is a bit of a racket too. If you have a set plan in place and use the money correctly, it does work. Most people don’t look at it that hard though, and set aside an amount assuming it can be used as needed, later discovering that some things can be used from one part, while others can’t until a part is paid out, much like a deductible. I think it works well for those needing regular medical help, but if you don’t…you lose a chuck of money, with only a bit rolling over for a few months.

      In short…health care shouldn’t be this hard and complex. It’s made that way for profit.

      • Kethal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        All insurance is paying to reduce risk, which is why I said it would be borderline crazy to not have general health coverege - that’s a lot of risk. Dental insurance for the most part covers routine costs, not high risk scenarios. Things like oral cancer are covered by more general plans. So I think largely I agree that dental insurance is a racket. However, I’m sure it makes sense for at least some people so it’s hard to make a blanket statement that no one shoud have it.

    • breetai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s a weird situation caused by WW2. Due to wage laws, higher wages couldn’t be offered. So they started to offer insurance. It caught on and became the standard.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s caused by both major parties being assets to the billionaire class, and working for them, against us.