Retro games are often known for being more difficult than their modern brethren. Every now and then though you run into a game that is actually too easy. Which game would you prefer to have more of a challenge?

  • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’ll also generally say ‘none’. I’m generally playing a game to explore its world or be part of its story and having difficulty for the sake of difficulty (which resulted in grinding in old RPGs, for example) is just not welcome.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Uhhhhhh…none? I’m 40, and suck at video games. Not because I’m old (shut up), but because I’ve always sucked at video games. I still haven’t beaten Super Mario Bros 3. I was there as it happened. That was my generation.

    What’s wrong with letting us terrible gamers enjoy a game??? Kirby and Yoshi games are the BEST!!!

    • misterp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m older (49) and suckier, but I beat Super Mario Bros 1 to 3. I played Kirby and I don’t know… I don’t wish it was harder. Part of the fun was that it was easy I think.

  • Eggyhead@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I’d say maybe Kirby’s Dreamland and Kirby’s Dreamland 2 for gameboy, but I actually really enjoyed the mindless simplicity of the whole experience.

    • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Battletoads for Gameboy. I just wanted to hear more of that slamming soundtrack, but the flying level beat me…

      EDIT Oh snipes I misread the post, I thought they were asking for games that were too hard

      I would have loved for Pokemon Red/Blue to have had some infinite endgame. It was already a big game so no harm done, bu I would have loved to have more use for my overpowered pokemon

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Super Mario World

    It had by far the best tech and it finally opened up the format to the real potential and then the actual gameplay was for the first time in the series basically just a guided walking tour of all these different areas you could visit and then you got handed a trophy. Pure crap

    Super Mario 64 had somewhat the same problem although with somewhat of a challenge from time to time, and with the added excuse that they were breaking new ground on the format and so it made sense for the difficulty curve not to be perfectly tuned and polished. SMW had no such reasons

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Super Mario World is my fave video game ever, but I agree it would be awesome to have a slightly harder version. I explored several challenging ROM hacks of it a few years ago and they were impossible to play, like I had to use save states to get through the first level. Celeste is basically my favorite difficult platformer now

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        Haha I had exactly the same result. I tried kaizo Mario and couldn’t make it past the first 10-15 seconds.

        This GDC talk about the level design for Celeste is a pretty fascinating look at how were the nuts and bolts of making it come out so polished + good