• vintageballs
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Probably due to automatic extension reviews by Mozilla.

    Sad that it happened, but at least it doesn’t impact the actual uBlock, only the lite version for which I honestly see no purpose in Firefox anyways.

    • Virkkunen@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was a manual review conducted by an actual person that in the end admitted they were wrong

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Agreed. Especially considering uBlock origin is pretty much the main reason to use FF at all. They shouldn’t be delegating reviews of it to someone who would fuck up this badly.

          Assuming this wasn’t a “test the waters” kind of thing to determine just how much they were reliant on ublock.

          I’ve been using the main FF build for a while now but I’m wondering if I should start looking at the various fork options.

        • Obinice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are you like, those old multi colour swirly rubber balls we used to get out of 20p machines as kids? Those were ill!

          • vintageballs
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t understand what you are telling me

                  • Obinice@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    To be fair it’s been less than a day, one of the great things about internet messaging is how asynchronous it can be, it’s great for calming anxieties about needing to come up with a reply immediately like if you’re on the phone or something x.x

                    You’re right though, I don’t reply to things often enough, partly because I’m very sick with COVID at the moment but also a lot of it is my social anxiety and fear of rejection.

                    I get so scared of what people might say that I avoid looking at the replies, even when I initially reach out because I want to interact with people and form connections ><

                    It’s one of my big problems that I need to overcome, I’m still working out how to tackle it, but I do know it’s a problem, and it’s mine to solve.

                    Alas I can’t afford things like therapy, so I just have to stumble around trying to figure my ADHD, possibly autistic (wish I could get seen for a diagnosis…), anxious, dumb ass brain out 😅

                    I’m sorry in the mean time for being a bit annoying, I don’t mean to be on purpose :-)

            • Obinice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Your username vintage balls reminded me of those little rubber balls we used to get at kids, I don’t see them any more (maybe they’re seen as too much of a choking hazard now?), so they feel kinda “vintage” to me now haha.

              Those things could really bounce! I liked the semi translucent ones with the rainbow swirl patterns.

      • abbenm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It was a manual review conducted by an actual person that in the end admitted they were wrong

        Good to know! I wasn’t sure if it was automated or not. That’s rough.

        • eRac@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The dev stated that it mostly exists for more performance-limited applications like mobile.

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I thought that was the shit Chrome was doing to block adblockers and antimalware plugins, if Firefox is doing the same thing what browser do we use now? :-(

        I don’t care about all the browser wars stuff, I lost interest when it was Netscape Vs IE, I just want a browser that I can configure fully myself and have it be as safe and secure as one can make it, within reason.

        • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          If we want to do something radically different, there’s always gopher and gemini browsers.

        • abbenm@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I thought that was the shit Chrome was doing to block adblockers and antimalware plugins, if Firefox is doing the same thing what browser do we use now? :-(

          They’re doing a modified version of V3 that they changed to restore ad-blocking functionality.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Theoretically, the browser executes the Mv3 blocking rules, so it could be optimized and more efficient than js ever could.