• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          I found a training thing that included the phrase “retard power” in an aviation context. The best part was the way it was enunciated. Not “ri-tard” like you do when it’s a verb, but long E ree-tard. I absolutely clipped it.

      • kiagam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        you know this is the internet and you are allowed to type whatever you want, right? let me show you: “retarded”

          • VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            “IDGI, this person has the option to be the worst version of themselves. Why dont they choose to do that?!? Also why does noone want to be around me? Could it be that marinating my brains in a writhing compost of clapbacks and dunks is desensitizing me to my own dehumanizing? No. Clearly this is because woke.”

          • Aermis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Is saying the word retarded without calling some it disrespectful? Is it now a trigger word? I’m genuinely wondering. Because when we were growing up we used the word EVERYWHERE. It was as common as saying “fricken”

            • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 days ago

              It’s a slur, that’s why. Some slurs are major slurs that are considered offensive even when it’s not referring to someone, and I think this is one of them. They’re often forbidden because of it, and a lot of people find it easier to follow universal rules than to check the rules of each place they post, because the universal rules will keep you in the clear 95% of the time. And even if not, it’s still respectable to not want to use slurs.

              And yeah, it did used to be a lot more common. And before that, it was a medical term. That’s the way it goes, we have a word to insult people’s intelligence, doctors deal with patients who have a disorder causing that, they don’t want to use the mean word to refer to the patients, they come up with a new word for it, the word gets out, and then everyone makes it a new word to insult intelligence. Though this one seems to be taking a different track because it hit modern sensibilities, and at the same time I think doctors now know better than to come up with a new word for mental deficiencies.

            • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 days ago

              We used LOTS of words then that are now not ok to use. Growing as individuals and groups is a good thing, being attentive to others is a good thing, understanding that you see no offence to a word where others do and changing that behaviour betters everyone.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              People used to use the n-word all the time, so it must be perfectly OK to say!

              This is the exact same argument. It doesn’t work, right? Why would it here? Sure, there may (I doubt it, but I’ll leave the possibility open) be other reasons why it’s OK to say, but throw that argument out.

              • bitchkat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                22 days ago

                The n-word did not have any other definitions. Something that is retarded is merely delayed or slowed down usually in the context of some task.

            • bitchkat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              Yeah you’re not supposed to even say “my son’s reading skills are somewhat retarded but we hope he can catch up to his peers”. Or “Progess on Trump’s border wall has been retarded for various reasons.”

  • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    The comments are pretty interesting when you read them on lemmy.ml

    That instance has server wide word filtering enabled that can’t be removed.

      • Alamp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        The idea that moderating slurs on an online forum is a stepping stone to an authoritarian hellscape really requires a special kind of brain worms

      • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        I’m actually OK with it.

        It’s their instance, you can check the wordlist in the config. It’s the slur_filter_regex. If it would bother me too much I’d change instance or spin up my own.
        I’m more enraged by shadow banning like on “other platforms”.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          ml hands out bans people who slightly disagree with their Communist loving opinions, how is that not censorship like on “other” platforms?

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Lol it’s too much credit to call them communist loving. Marx would be turning in his grave if he saw the regimes these tankies venerate

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              Of course Marx isn’t really a good hold up either. Any actually communist society probably wouldn’t follow a lot of his doctrines. His beliefs, if actually implemented, would have all ended in civil unrest anyway. His views were inherently unfair and very much open to abuse and corruption. If you were unlucky enough to be on the bottom rung of society then that’s where you stayed.

              A modern view of communism would be much closer to socialism than anything Marx advocated for. At least socialism allows for social advancement.

              On a continuum where you’ve got tankies on one side and socialism on the other, Marx would be closer to the Tankies end of the spectrum than the socialist. He’s definitely not in the middle.

              • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                If you were unlucky enough to be on the bottom rung of society then that’s where you stayed.

                A modern view of communism would be much closer to socialism than anything Marx advocated for. At least socialism allows for social advancement.

                My guy you don’t know shit. Marx believed in a classless society. There would be no “rungs”. Also what he believed in is socialism, because communism is a form of socialism. This is what happens when you believe what the right wing tells you about Karl Marx without actually asking any leftists or reading it for yourself.

                A lot of the things Tankies believe like the concept of a Vanguard party happened after Marx. Marx would have never approved of the USSR, or at least how it ended and all the things that happened under Stalin.

                • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  Marx believed in a classless society.

                  Yeah but he didn’t. Because money still exists and been poor meant you got less money. So no matter what he said you would still have less. You’d need UBI to really go classless

              • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                Fair enough. I know a lot of his views were rooted in traditions and biases he grew up around. My point was more just that tankies and places like modern Russia and China aren’t really communist.

                My girlfriend is Chinese and she has shared so many examples of classism and wealth inequality there, many of which are enforced by the state and its laws. China is in many ways no more egalitarian than the US.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Nope. Completely missed the point.

          What is unspoken there is that censorship is always based on good intentions such as yours. People trying to censor sex are trying to do the same thing you’re trying to do with censoring hate speech.

          “Only censoring the bad stuff” is not the solution here. It’s the source of the problem.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Perhaps it’s a sexual thing. You know like if you are hit a lot as a child.

        Perhaps Tankies learn to enjoy censorship and repression. That’s the only justification I can think of for censoring themselves, it’s pretty hilarious when you think about it.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Anon is a retard. Also why did that word go out of style? I know damn well it’s because it was abused but by definition:

    to delay or impede the development or progress of : to slow up especially by preventing or hindering advance or accomplishment

    It’s a fair critique. We need to stop this PC bullshit. I’m saying this as a father of two children in the spectrum and neither of them are retards.

    • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      It’s not about being PC, it’s about how the word is used. There’s nothing wrong with the word as it’s defined, but when it becomes a common insult it becomes less acceptable. Just like any other swear word.

      • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        If my name ever becomes a commonly used insult, what then?

        Any word can become an insult. It’s time to take some words back. We have to actively correct misused words. It may make a difference.

        • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          I don’t get the obsession with reintroducing negatively charged words into the common language. Isn’t english a rich enough language that there’s an abundance of substitutes for words?

          • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            You may invent words as long as you like, but those words can definitely become corrupted as well. It will be an endless cycle.

            The only way to stop that is to put our feet down and correct the misuse.

            • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 days ago

              Look at something written 500 years ago. 100 years ago. 50 years ago. Language changes all the time, and there is no stopping that. Yep, language is an endless cycle of switching out common words and adapting to social rules. I’d highly reccommend to follow that flow instead of trying to bring back the “good old days” when n-words and r-words were common and accepted.

              • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                The guy is talking about an accepted phenomenon called the euphemism treadmill. Look it up.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      That’s okay because we’re having a fire retardant door installed. Once it’s in, you’re outta there bud

  • Shard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    OP lied in his interview. Always bad form to lie in an interview.

    OP was clearly Tardy.

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    To be fair retarded means slowed or delayed so how many times was anon retarded in getting to work?