CEO of Tesla and acting President-elect Musk is going on a neo-Nazi binge endorsing far right candidates instead of properly running the companies he’s involved in such as Tesla.

In addition Tesla is considered one of the most unreliable car brands according to: https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-placed-bottom-consumer-reports-reliability-rankings/

Moreover Tesla has the highest fatal accident rates of all car brands according to: https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a62919131/tesla-has-highest-fatal-accident-rate-of-all-auto-brands-study/

Also there are privacy implications with using a car that could in theory spy on you: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2023/05/massive-trove-of-tesla-files-contains-thousands-of-safety-complaints/

Now that more competent and establish brands are making EVs there’s no reason to buy a Tesla if you want an EV. I’m not here to recommend another brand, I’m just here to tell you that your next EV should be anything other than a Tesla.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    The first point rings true, but the other points seem like cherry picking.

    • perestroika@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      A note on the “Fatal accident rate” topic:

      A car which uses touch panels for control and electronics for simple things like doors, and relies only on a camera to do self-driving (no lidar), is bound to be unsafe in multiple ways. Drivers make more mistakes because they aren’t provided physical switches and levers, they make mistakes because they’re distracted by light from screens, in emergencies there are issues with unlocking doors and finally, when machine vision fails, there is no backup to tell of a Big Old Obstacle right ahead.

      A note on the “Spying” topic:

      Mozilla compared privacy policies. They didn’t actually take apart cars, intercept their comms or dissect manufacturers’ apps. I wish there existed a review of actual behaviours, as opposed to policies.

      A car’s ability to actually spy on the user depends on its tech, not just the policy. So a very simple car (not a Tesla, obviously) with a very agressive policy of “we collect everything” would be safer than a smartphone on wheels with a modest policy. You can’t spy if you haven’t got sensors.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      As far as your points about the fatal accidents stuff goes - maybe Tesla shouldn’t call it Full Self Driving if it can’t fully self-drive without killing you, and maybe their cars shouldn’t go 0-60 in 2 seconds by default, if that proves too difficult for inexperienced drivers to control.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      “Reliability” is a difficult metric. It can cover everything from faulty seals on a door to a transmission that fails in 5k miles. One thing to search for when you’re trying to see how reliable cars are is technical service bulletins (TSBs); the more a given make/model has, the more likely it is that there will be significant reliability issues.

      IIRC most electric cars from newer companies have reliability issues, while electric vehicles from established brands tend to be more reliable.

      As far as privacy goes, unless you buy with cash, you aren’t going to have a lot of choice to turn off telemetry. And you might lose parts of the dashboard (e.g., the entire infotainment system) if you pull fuses.