• mustbe3to20signs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s a huge word salat salad just to say “I’m an incel”

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is female derogatory? I thought it was just a more scientific classification.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Using female as a noun (rather than as an adjective, such as in the phrase “female firefighter”, or any phrase of the format “female $noun”) is generally overly clinical and dehumanizing. Some people do it out of habit due to their profession-- usually researchers or soldiers-- but they usually say “males and females”, which while still weird isn’t the worst.

        The guys who say “men and females” are the ones you need to watch out for.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Using scientific terminology in colloquial speech is weird and creepy in most contexts. Calling kids “juveniles” and women “females” carries certain connotations, most of them bad.

      • FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s not inherently derogatory, but it does hold a connotation if you refer to women as females particularly in contexts where you wouldn’t/don’t refer to men as males.

      • mustbe3to20signs
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Yes, using scientific terminology can be derogatory. But in this case, acting like the opposite gender is a species on its own, classifying them as animals and slurring all women as hoes gave it away for me.