• spacecadet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is female derogatory? I thought it was just a more scientific classification.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Using scientific terminology in colloquial speech is weird and creepy in most contexts. Calling kids “juveniles” and women “females” carries certain connotations, most of them bad.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Using female as a noun (rather than as an adjective, such as in the phrase “female firefighter”, or any phrase of the format “female $noun”) is generally overly clinical and dehumanizing. Some people do it out of habit due to their profession-- usually researchers or soldiers-- but they usually say “males and females”, which while still weird isn’t the worst.

      The guys who say “men and females” are the ones you need to watch out for.

    • FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It’s not inherently derogatory, but it does hold a connotation if you refer to women as females particularly in contexts where you wouldn’t/don’t refer to men as males.

    • mustbe3to20signs
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Yes, using scientific terminology can be derogatory. But in this case, acting like the opposite gender is a species on its own, classifying them as animals and slurring all women as hoes gave it away for me.