• LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    American soldiers regularly paint imagery and words on the ammunition and vehicles they use to kill people. Are they terrorists too?

    • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The military is political. It is literally policy when the military moves. Anything any military does is dictionary terrorism. But terrorism is a nasty word for it so we don’t call it that.

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I mean I’d agree lol but I doubt this person equates Luigi and the average American soldier painting a bomb. That’s my point. Writing on a bullet case or writing a political statement doesn’t make one terrorist. It’s the violent acts and who they’re directed at any why that determine it.

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        sigh yes you’re the third or fourth person to make this joke. Yes I agree.

        The point is that nobody calls them terrorists for doing that. Putting words or art on weapons and ammo is considered “normal” as twisted as that is. So Luigi’s doing it does not make him a terrorist.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah I mean it’s obviously trumped-up bullshit in his case, they’re making a point of throwing the book at him any way they can because the owners got their jimmies rustled