• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    … which isn’t news to me.

    For a time it seemed that everybody wanted to shit on animals as being way inferior to humans in every way, including lacking empathy emotion feelings and stuff.

    But that was always wrong. Who has ever worked with animals be it horses dogs or farm animals knows they have a soul. Well, but also a lot of them are just evil bastards.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If a rat has a better developed sense of empathy than you do, then you’ve probably made some seriously awful life choices somewhere along the line.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    The owners use their captured public education and for profit media to turn us on one another and make us monsters.

    They tell us avarice/greed, a well known character deficit and social blight for thousands of years is instead virtuous rational self-interest.

    They force us to compete against one another rather than cooperate with one another as the basis of our economy, when an economy is meant to be a lowly tool of society for the explicit use of maximizing the efficient, equitable distribution of goods and services for the benefit of the citizens of the society. Our tail wags the dog. We are slaves to economic growth/metastasis we as a society do not benefit from.

    The problem is that the sociopaths, mentally ill people literally incapable of empathy, something most humans have a strong need to exercise, that are among us quickly game society using their mental deficit as an advantage to take more than they need and manipulate others into elevating them, then manipulate those below them into fighting one another perpetually to stay on top.

    Humans are social creatures. We’ve been conditioned to act as monsters, condemning our fellow humans literally dying in our streets of exposure and capital defense force brutality as “lowering our property values.”

    This isn’t natural. It’s why our nation’s mental health is basically its own apocalypse of mass depression, anxiety, and never ending trauma. We are strongly discouraged from supporting one another, as we’re supposed to do the impossible, pull ourselves up by our bootstraps, then claim we did it alone. That’s the American delusion. 🇺🇸

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This really resonates with me. You are an excellent writer.

      The part about empathy is so real. A lack of empathy is a real advantage in today’s world, unfortunately. I think empathy should be one of the most important values a society should strive for, and we decided to make a society that rewards sociopathy instead.

  • ThaMunsta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    A lot of animals are better at solving “prisoners dilemma” situations than us. Most animals would rather work together for the greater good but I guess they haven’t heard of capitalism.

  • GreenEyedMonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    After observing all of the animals I’ve ever lived with, I’ve come to the opinion (unsupported, I suppose, by any real evidence) that empathy is an important part of being alive. I think every living being has empathy, and humans just got quite good at beating it out of other humans to the point where displaying psychopathic traits became something culturally celebrated.

    We’ve been trained to be this way, and we need to reverse that trend.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Altrusim is a good trait to ensure the survival of a species, while being a selfish bastard is a good trait to ensure the survival of the individual. It all depends on the situation.

    • killingspark
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      But don’t you see all the wealth we are creating by doing things this way?!

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Rats live like 2 years.

    In two years, they learn how to be better to each other than a large part of the human race.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think of it in another way: What these rats display is the natural behavior.

      These rats live two years, so they don’t have time to learn otherwise. Human greed is a learned behavior, and it takes a lot of time to learn that.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Greed is a pattern which is adopted to our current competitive environment, where everything is directed at progress and hard work. Really, humans often work 40 hours a week or more, which is significantly more time than wild animals spend to gather food. (I don’t have a source for this unfortunately, but if i remember correctly it’s maybe 2-3 hours a day.)

  • ✧✨🌿Allo🌿✨✧@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Meanwhile humans, when put thru the same experiment, realize they can make the human in the unpleasant box pay $ if it wants out. They then learn to create more boxes for more profit.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I dont believe this is inherent. It’s not human nature. Its social conditioning as a result of living in a capitalist society.

      In a capitalist society, yes. Absolutely a lot of people would do this. But even then, its not everyone.

      I live in capitalism but i would certainly not force someone to pay me to let them out of a trap. Especially if they were suffering. And i would never befriend someone that would.

      I would think they were a cunt.

      • ✧✨🌿Allo🌿✨✧@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        you must suck at capitalism then and would literally never be able to chair a publicly traded company maximizing profits, no matter the cost, for shareholders then. (i say lovingly)

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 hours ago

          If I’m ever told that I belong on a board of directors at a company, I’m going to Luigi myself. I would have deserved it

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I really dont mind sucking at capitalism.

          That’s like saying “you suck at giving people cancer” or saying “you are terrible at being a complete dildo”

          Yeah. I am fine with that.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        And i would never befriend someone that would.

        My problem here: many of us are friends with one of the other person that thinks investing money in the stock market is a good idea and taxes for the rich is bad. Those people are already forcing others to pay to get out of a trap, they just have a few middle men.

  • deikoepfiges_dreirad@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Capitalism wants us to believe that it’s the only stable solution, because it comes close to the natural order, and that in nature there is only selfish behaviour, eat or get eaten, homo homini lupus and so on. The truth is, this supposed natural state is completely made up and animals and human beings naturally behave much more selflessly than what is expected from us under capitalism.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Thing is, even the phrase homo homini lupus predates capitalism significantly, and the sentiment dates back to before even the phrase. ‘Naturally behave’ is a very questionable phrase.

      We have the ability to be better and build better societies than we currently have under capitalism. I just don’t think an appeal to a state of nature is useful or accurate.

      • deikoepfiges_dreirad@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I think there is definitely a line from early modern natural state theory to today’s justification of capitalism, although the argument has somehow reversed itself.

        Actual natural behaviour is not even important, since we abandoned that some time ago, and it probably isn’t desirable to go back. Its just easier to sell an ideology when you disguise it as natural order.

    • Zacryon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s natural selection which has born empathy. There are a lot of species which are successful because they are collaborative.

      Same story with us humans. We usually prefer groups and collaboration. And look what we can achieve if we put all of our minds and strengths together.
      Yet, this hasn’t been sufficient to overcome some individuals who live and enforce competitiveness.

      • exasperation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Dawkins’ The Selfish Gene goes into this in greater detail. Many species are hardwired to be willing to sacrifice their own lives for the survival of their kin. Basically, genes that code for protective and social behaviors might result in any given individual more likely to die before reproducing, but makes that individual’s close genetic kin more likely to survive to reproduction such that a particular group/pod/clan/flock is much more likely to persist over generations.

        The extreme example is ants and bees, where most of the workers we see biologically cannot reproduce and are dead ends as individuals. But they work for the hive/colony, and the reproducing queen is the center of that reproductive strategy.

        You see it with a lot of animals, especially those wired to be social.

    • smayonak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Fear and stress shut down empathy. But narcissists feel constant fear and stress. And we’ve made a hellworld that rewards narcissism

  • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I think we shouldn’t underestimate human empathy. The problem is just that we build structures to avoid it. Rich people choose to not see poor people too much or they would feel empathy and be inclined to help them. If the poor are far away, merely an abstraction that is said to exist, then their existence is not felt strongly enough to trigger an empathy response. Surely there are exceptions to some degree, but I think humans are very empathetic and that’s one of our great powers.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We have places like San Fransisco and New York, with some of the richest people in the whole world regularly walking past homeless encampments. I don’t think the structure is the problem. I think it has much more to do with the culture and family they are raised in.

      We live in a society that rewards narcissism. Our society tells these rich people that homeless people are only homeless because of bad personal choices.

      There is no reward for empathy, besides the positive feeling a healthy person would get from being kind. In fact, being empathetic can be a detriment to being successful, so many upper class families skip that lesson plan on purpose.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I like the one where they gave rats a lot of food and space (rat paradise) and let them breed till they were crawling over eachother till there wasnt enough food for them all. When most of them died and food was available once more, the remainders stopped eating and all the rats died.

    Rats are interesting but I think the guy that programmed them left in some bugs.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Even the creator of that experiment said it was deeply flawed, and that their colony broke down because there was literally nothing to enrich their lives in the habitat. They were essentially going crazy from boredom.

      He then went on to design rat experiments that were designed to actually facilitate a fulfilling and engaging life for the rats, and they thrived, from what I recall.

    • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah idk if I just watched most of my friends and family drop dead from starvation, I don’t think I’d want to go on living either.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      rats are strange little critters. incredibly clever, but you’ll never know what they’ll use their smarts for

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I don’t think this was about the intellect either, just about empathy. Sure, the free rat could learn to open it quicker, but the point is that it did. It didn’t eventually figure “eh, nothing in it for me”, it repeatedly went and freed the other to the point of routine.

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They’re known to be the only animal on the planet more intelligent than dolphins. IIRC only two of them survived though, while the dolphins all left in time.