• redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Strap 20 sd card with 1TB capacity each. Send the pidgeon to a neighboring city, 2 hours flight time.

    Bandwidth: 2.78 GB/s (assuming no wild hawks in the area)

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are forgetting the time it takes to copy the data to and from these cards. Data may be transported, but it is not usable until you copy it. Copying 20 TiB is probaply going to take some time

    • mineapple@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We had a TV report about a photographer who actually transfered big files with via horse because the transfer over the internet was slower than a calm ride. (Germany - 2021) link for Germans

  • Senseless@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When Baldur’s Gate 3 came out our group of friends wanted to start a game together. Since one of our friends, living about a kilometer away, has shitty internet it was faster for me to download the game myself, copy it to a USB stick, have it driven over by another friend, copy it onto the friends PC and verify file integrity than downloading it.

    German internet in a nutshell.

    So yeah, IPoAC would’ve it’s purpose.

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      IPoAC is a joke about printing actual IP packets, sending them by pigeon, then scanning them.

      You do the whole usual TCP ACK/SYN thing, but with pigeons.

      It’s not the same as ‘sneakernet, but strapping microsd cards to a pigeon’. It’s way, way sillier.

    • stingpie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m assuming English isn’t your first language, but “IPoAC would’ve it’s purpose” is grammatically awkward. “Would’ve” doesn’t really work for possession. Instead you can use “would have,” but people would typically say “IPoAC has it’s purpose”

      • Senseless@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the clarification. You’re right, English isn’t my first language.

        I’m a bit confused by your sentence:

        ““Would’ve” me doesn’t really work fur possession. Instead you can use “would have””

        That’s the same thing, isn’t it? My idea with using “would’ve” was that IPoAC would have it’s purpose, if it was a thing. I’m missing the descriptive word in either language right now.