• Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    178
    ·
    23 days ago

    “ma’am, the penis’s owner, you, literally told me to put a condom on it. Not sure how much more consent I could have.”

  • MBM@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    23 days ago

    Why is everyone getting angry at this woman who most likely doesn’t even exist

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Turns out, engaging with the hypothetical creates more interesting discussion than saying “fake” and nothing else.

    • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 days ago

      It happens to every greentext post on lemmy, gotta bring em back down to reality and let them know it’s fake and gay.

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 days ago

      Greentexts are improv comedy and everyone is polite enough to play along instead of trying to argue what is clearly a made-up story for laughs

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      The entire premise of the green-text is that it’s an autistic work of fiction. Pointing that out is redundant.

  • bizarroland@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    Being asked to do a task by the person responsible for administering the task automatically obviates you from being classified as a rapist.

      • bizarroland@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        69
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 days ago

        Yes.

        They are penis models, not human beings.

        It is context specific.

        If a human being asked you to do sex things to them and you decide to do it then you have been granted enthusiastic consent to do those sex things.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          23 days ago

          So if they are model penises but you are not asked to put the condom on them, but you do anyway, is that sexual assault?

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          The original comment doesnt include anything about objects… It only talks about tasks and people asking you to complete tasks.

          Ofcourse you cant rape an object, but the comment wasnt talking about that, it was talking about something much more generalized.

          • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            23 days ago

            The post does point out that there’s a table full of penis models (so essentially dildos) and that the task is to put a condom on one of them.

            A bodyless fake penis is clearly not a sentient being so the only way a violation of consent happened if consent applied to inanimate objects. That is, of course, a ridiculous and easily attacked proposition.

            In the end this would be an example of trying to make a valid point but making it in a clumsy way.

          • Undaunted@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            You really have to get into that mercenary mindset. You’re obviously not responsible for your actions, if you’re just executing tasks someone else wants you to do. Smh

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        23 days ago

        If the person who put the dildos there and handed you the condom is asking you to put that condom on one of the dildos, then the person that owns the dildo already gave you consent to use their dildo, thereby you can’t be a raping their dildo. It ain’t difficult.

        In the context they’re obviously saying that the other person initiating sexual activity is consent in of itself, ergo you can’t be a rapist for reciprocating that consent.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    “Did you ask them for their consent before putting them here on display, naked?”

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Reminds me of that bit on The Office about safe sex. Darryl says something like “Oh, I didn’t know we were doing trick questions. What’s the safest way to go skiing? Not go skiing.”

  • abbadon420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    23 days ago

    If someone sprung that trap on me, I’d say “no, it’s a toy. A toy doesn’t have any consent right or consciousness… just like a woman” and than I’d just walk away. If you want to be cunts, ww can be cunts

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        23 days ago

        It’s not a joke, it’s an expression of my disgust for the entrapment.

          • abbadon420@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            It is not an insult to all women. It is directed at one single individual and it is their level we’re palying here. Gender is not something that would usually be an insultable quality, but since they’re trying to paint me as a rapist, they’ve put gender on the table. They’re also the one who threw the unintelligent “all men are rapists” rethoric, so I’ll throw the equally unintelligent “all women are objects”. Fight them with their own weapons. I know I will not win an argument this way, but that was not the goal here. This will just make them feel bad for a second and me feel good for a second. It is cheap and dirty, but sometimes that’s what you need.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Either this only happened to the FOAF of someone interviewed on FoxNews, or if it did, it was a false-flag operation organised by Turning Point or some similar group to radicalise young men against feminism and consent culture, as anyone who gave it a moment’s thought would see that that would be its outcome.

    • Waldowal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Or, girl was flirting and op missed his big chance!:

      girl: You didn’t ask for consent.

      op: [hands penis statue back] Can you show me?

      girl: [asks penis for consent. Mimics penis responding ‘yes’ in Muppet voice. Proceeds to slowly and erotically apply condom while maintaining eye contact with op.]

      op: I’m not getting it. Do you offer private tutoring?

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    “Sorry, it was my first time with a dildo.”

    (stare in silence for a moment too long… go ahead… respond…

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    After watching a lot of Game Changer, where they always ask for concent for the mannequins, I would also ask just for the bit.