Poor one out for all your LGBTQ+ homies in America, they’re about to be hunted for sport.

  • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It really isn’t leftists’ fault, though. Trump easily won the popular vote and flipped georgia, pennsylvania, and wisconsin from their dem vote in 2020. Low voter turnout/voter suppression are the real culprits - along with dems failing to do almost any of the things that could’ve changed this outcome. Leftist memes did not lose dems the election. Voter apathy and the sheer popularity of fascism did.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      There’s a million reasons people have given me for voting Trump, none of them rational. But the classic tropes of fear and disgust won out again. I’m old enough to remember the 2004 election, then it was gay people. Now it’s trans people and dark-skinned migrants. I really didn’t think those old tropes would work this time, but it just keeps working. Americans will just keep falling for it, apparently.

      While it’s depressing that we’re reminded of the power of dumb at hateful people yet again, we should remember that nothing actually changed in that regard this election. We’re just discovering what’s always been there beneath the surface. I don’t think the malaise we’re feeling now is so much about what Trump will do - sure scores of people will die from bad policy, but that’s nothing new. Rather, we’re upset about what this reveals about ourselves. But we shouldn’t be upset about the act of revelation, because it tells us what we need to fix.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        To continue this thought, you might be interested to know how neuroscience tells us the brain works: In short, the unconscious mind decides and acts, and the conscious mind makes up stories about why. Quite often, the story is just wrong, or at least misguided. Those voters have a real reason that they don’t understand or won’t admit to themselves, and a million reasons that they give instead to explain it.

        Yes, we need to drop the misconception that people rationally decide about much of anything, and learn about their real reasons.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Leftist memes did not lose dems the election. Voter apathy and the sheer popularity of fascism did.

      I’m not necessarily attributing blame here, but I’m pretty sure that OP is suggesting that leftist memes helped lead to this apathy. Say what you will, Trump voters were excited for their candidate… somehow, despite the list of reasons not to being far too long to be listed here. But many on the left either were just lukewarm on her, just considered her the lesser of two evils, or were protest voting third party or abstaining for one reason or another, mostly over Palestine. And there were memes galore to make clear to everyone what the general mood was. It doesn’t exactly inspire enthusiasm to those that need that a lot of enthusiasm to even bother (those people are frustrating, btw). I don’t know how much it actually contributed to or propogated the apathy versus how much it just reflected the apathy already there, but a case could be made either way.

      • Sooperstition@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Kamala isn’t on the left. The democrats aren’t on the left. This is a false dichotomy. They’re all capitalists. You can’t be on the left and be a capitalist, so leftists had many more disagreements with Kamala than Palestine.

        Now, if you want to look at a great analysis of fascism and the false dichotomy in American politics, read Blackshirts and Reds by Michael Parenti.

      • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It is on the candidate to inspire people. Yeah, the left was lukewarm to a candidate that was trying her best to court Republicans. How else could you expect that to play out?

      • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They didn’t lead to the apathy - they pointed out the existing apathy would cost Dems the election. It’s like saying the person who said you need to wear a seatbelt caused the wreck.

        You’re exactly right about people being excited for Trump and lukewarm on Harris, but that’s entirely on the Democrats for picking the platform and strategy that lost to Trump in 2016.

        Harris had a notable and surprising lead when they announced Biden was out - then they changed nothing else. People didn’t just not like the candidate, they didn’t like the policies. They only changed the candidate and thought Trump was a big enough cudgel to bully people into voting even though that demonstrably doesn’t work.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why do you think the turnout was so low? Millions of idiots were pressuring people to withhold their vote over Palestine in a colossal self-fuck. That is if you assume these people spreading that are really that stupid. Some were, but I think a large percentage were paid trolls. And their campaigning worked. Russia owns the United States now

      • normal_user@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I see, so in order to save “democracy” people should have supported Genocide.

        Honeslty maybe the Democrats should have seen this coming to themselves for supporting, and I will repeat it once more in case you don’t understand, GENOCIDE.

        Imagine voting for 100% Hitler because another guy could be 150% Hitler.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m on this kick of pointing out that the utilitarian ethical calculation still works with 100% Hitler and 100.1% Hitler. Harm minimization, baby!

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            yeah its why no some takes utilitarian’s seriously. Hi friend I have this new policy where you give me your left arm and I don’t take your legs!

          • normal_user@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So by your logic, in Nazi Germany, you would have supported Hitler if there was another guy that was even worse than him ?

            Do you even have a red line or can politicians just screw you over indefinitely for as long as there is someone worse !?

            • normal_user@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Also if the Democrats really wanted to win this elections, they would have run a different candidate that the one that is supervising Gaza right now !

              You can also go back and see that people said in a lot of pools that they saw the economy as a big issue for them. If the average person in America sees that their economic situation is getting worse with Biden and wants change, you don’t run his VP for president !

              The Democrats don’t care about you and they don’t care about winning. They are funded by the same billioners that fund the Republicans. They just want to kill minorities and cut taxes for the rich as much as Republicans but they don’t say it as clearly.

              The Democrats are just controlled opposition that takes away votes from the non-fascist parties in the US.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Another contributor to low turnout was massive voter suppression. It’d be interesting to see that quantified. Hundreds of thousands of voters were being purged in each of several states. The single-issue Gaza vote was lost in the noise of those gross examples of electoral manipulation.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’m sure you’re right. It’s hard to know where to focus the blame most, but I am livid that this country is worse than my worst fears. On a certain level I am losing any desire to even care specifically how/why. I wouldn’t have considered not voting before this but now I honestly am 99.9% of the way to saying fuck it all.

      • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Only 10% of the electorate even cared about Gaza. You’re giving the American people entirely too much credit.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I don’t know what point you think you’re making, but after yesterday I give the American people zero credit. Millions of voters stayed home pretending it was about gaza. It’s not my job to psychoanalyze them but I do know their actions contradicted their stated goal and that makes them frauds.

      • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah there are only so many times Biden can go “hey isreal, you’d better stop that genocide or else!” While doing nothing whatsoever and even giving them the weapons to continue the genocide before people go “well they aren’t going to do a damn thing about this”

          • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m not supporting that idea nor voter apathy. But i can certainly understand why Kamala lost Michigan, Dearborn has the largest muslim population in the country. I can understand why so many people there might be apathetic or uninterested in voting for a party that has put forth no pushback or even plans to stop an ongoing genocide against people of their faith.

            Again, Trump will absolutely be far worse by just greenlighting isreal.

            • Sooperstition@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Again, Trump will absolutely be far worseby just greenlighting isreal.

              The aim of a genocide is the same whether there’s someone with a blue tie approving it or a red tie approving it. Israel wants to displace or kill every Palestinian and break their culture and heritage.

              That’s what genocide is. You can’t get worse than that, and that’s what’s happening.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              Trump will absolutely be far worse by just greenlighting isreal.

              Something every human had the means to see coming. They just either didn’t care or plugged their eyes and ears to it.

              • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Oh you mean they didn’t show up to support your preferred minority issue? huh. I wonder how the arabs felt this entire campaign?

                No one owes you their vote. You need to earn it. Your support of the shit behavior towards arabs (and others) demonstrated by the democratic party and its candidate is what caused this.

                go home trick. connect with your community. get support. if you need some help lines to call I can find them.

              • LienNoir@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Yep! Why didn’t they vote ?! Why didn’t they choose the genocide eneblers, it’s only been 1 yearsince it started!! Those abstinent peaple are surely responsible for what Trump gonna do. But the Kamalla voters aren’t responcible for it. They are the right choise !!!

              • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’m not disagreeing with you. All I’m saying is that I understand why say a Palistinian American might be adverse to voting for the side actively faning the flames to a genocide including their own family members. I can imagine waking up and being told you should vote for the side that supplied the bombs that exploded half your family and going “why? So the other half can also get bombed? My whole family is going to die either way” and that being their rational for not voting.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Wh vote for the side that didn’t interfere when someone else bombed your family, when you can help elect someone who will encourage them to bomb every living relative too

                  • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    JFC. What is with you people? I don’t understand what you want from me. I voted blue straight down ballot in a swing state and I yelled at my lefty friends to do the same.

                    All I am saying and have been saying is I understand why people whose friends and family are being exterminated might not want to vote for team actively arming the people commiting a genocide.

                    Hell, theres another post right now on lefty memes about how the harris team knew saying they’d stop arming isreal would give them a jump in the polls.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It can’t possibly be because that’s a real concern. They had to be paid actors. You sound like Infowars after a school shooting.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                You still don’t get it do you? Blaming the people you need to persuade is not a winning strategy. They aren’t going to magically like you suddenly.

                • futatorius@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Holding people accountable for their actions that affect you is an entirely just and necessary thing to do.

                  • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 hours ago

                    Yes, and the people at fault are the democratic party, their consultants, and people like tracy who can’t get over their vaunted ‘lesser evil!’ world view to realize just how fucking toxic as individuals they are. we’re engaging because tracy needs the release and others need to see how toxic it is.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    I hold the Democratic party entirely responsible for trying to win by stealing Trump’s base instead of working with the left. The voters cannot themselves be to blame in this kind of election because that assumption destroys democracy. If I must vote for one of two bad candidates then the parties are never pressured to even pretend they represent the people. This isn’t hard, 19 year old college freshmen learn this stuff.

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      If Harris had campaigned on the issues she would have had so many Republican women jump ship. Just look at how many of them voted for abortion in Missouri.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It wasn’t ‘voter apathy’ it was a misplaced sense of voter moral superiority. It’s the thing leftist rhetoric has been weak to for a very long time. That love of withholding support except for perfection. The idea that compromise or chosing a lesser evil from two bad options dirties you. It doesn’t matter what you lost if you personally took “the high ground”.

      This cutting of our noses to spite our face was exploited all to shit this election. They lulled people by appealing to the same zeal of righteousness that they know divides us fundamentally knowing that when push comes to shove people will turn up their noses on principle of not being personally catered to and forget that their ability to help at all is contingent on the freedoms that one party was explicitly putting on the chopping block.

      It will be a while before people can admit that they were duped and there’s a lot of fault to go around, particularly in those funded astroturf campaigns designed to bait the hook… The right have been watching us for the past decade they knew how to divide us and it is on US that so many of us fell for it.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Dude, wow okay. let me inform you how voting works.

        1. a person (or group) has ideas, and says ‘hey friends, support me so I can implement these ideas’
        2. people then look at your ideas and say ‘oh that sounds grand!’ or ‘No thanks, pass’
        3. the person who gets the most people to say ‘oh that sounds grand!’ wins.

        now here is the thing. harris ‘grand idea’ was a fucking genocide, and no support for labor. this isn’t about fucking moral superiority. its about a complete fucking lack of morals by harris across the board.

        If you walk into a fucking room of people and tell them to ‘join you for some genocide’ dear fucking god do I hope they tell you to fuck right off. Now unfortunately 30% of the population is down for genocide. another 30% are willing to go along with it if you threaten them enough (or won’t impact them personally). and a final 30% is like ‘lulz newp’. Why the democrats thought it would be good policy to try to out compete genocidal fucks at their own game for votes is beyond me.

      • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You really think the 15 million people who voted for Biden but not Kamala was “misplaced sense of moral superiority”? Why?

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yes I do. Because The situation in Gaza was not an election issue for Biden. There was a fantastic amount of campaigning, a lot of it bought and paid for, that turned that genocide into a single issue vote with tis holier than thou reaction of withdrawal from the entire system toted as the answer. It is political suicide to run a mainstream Pro-Palistine presidential campaign in the US. A candidate of one of the two main parties need unilateral support from their donation streams and encumbant systems and the Republicans knew that. They know that’s the devil’s bargain every DNC candidate has to sign to even get a shot.

          Republican money supported Jill Stein to serve as a spoiler candidate to engage those with a naive veiw of the system but still wanted to vote and then they helped pipe that message through all manner of socials that if enough people withold their vote then Kamala would have shift her position… Because they knew how enticing that is. The idea that you don’t have to compromise your integrity and that that will be rewarded. They turned this into a single issue campaign for so many people knowing that they didn’t need to shift their position even a little. They could let their Red capped demogogues talk about literally beheading people and those high on this intoxication of absolute righteousness would ONLY care about an issue that Republicans can flaunt their support in favor of.

          It was misplaced moral superiority in part that got us here because if you were lulled into not voting or voting third party because one candidate wasn’t “leftist enough” when the alternative is someone popular with an entrenched imobile base of support who wants to make sure leftistism dies dead then you failed to get the assignment.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Because the alternative involves accepting that moving to the right has failed as a strategy, and they don’t want to do anything else.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Do you remember the number on this “incumbent advantage”? The establishment didn’t just switch out Biden on a whim. Biden literally fucked his chances at winning at the debate. You are barking up the wrong tree

          • Lyricism6055@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Biden was never going to win. He is actively losing his marbles. It was so painfully obvious even Democrats had to accept it.

            Yes incumbent advantage is real, but Biden had so many other disadvantages that he’d have never won.

            It sucks but it is what it is.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Biden was never going to win. He is actively losing his marbles. It was so painfully obvious even Democrats had to accept it.

              And yet now everyone has to pretend that a single coherent thought comes out of Trumps mouth in any given 5 minutes.

              • Lyricism6055@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Did I say I’m happy about trump either? No. It just is what it is. The democrat party knew that pushing for Biden last election had a chance for this to happen.

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It is an advantage useful when it’s not enough to win? Do you not remember the numbers at the time?! For all the pro genocide and ignoring of his base, going on TV and having a senior moment for an hour ended all discussion on the matter. The fact that the internal fighting in its aftermath is proof that Biden did not have the confidence of his base. Harris is the current vice president, if you wanted an incumbent advantage that it’s what you had. And to argue that “burden would have won i told you so!” Is to argue from ignorance. You don’t know, and all evidence pointed to it not being so.

            • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I mean, if they really really really wanted that incumbent advantage, Biden could have stepped out.

              • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 day ago

                What i do know is that confidence in Biden was in the shitter. Wile republicans have never had any consideration about trumps mental decline as long as he was their monster, left wing voters are fractional based on attaining left ideals, of which Biden did not achieve. Add on to that where Biden was in Obvious decline, it’s no wonder that there was infighting on his viability. The fact that there was even a discussion means that the incumbency was worth fuck and all.

                You should be angry but all evidence points to your “i told you so!” Is incorrect. Trump won the popular vote, end of.

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        Encumbant advantage? In this economic climate, it’s exactly the opposite. People who are feeling increasingly fed up with a world in which they cannot make ends meet vote against the status quo.

        4 years of Trump got people to vote against Trump. 4 years of Biden got people to vote against his VP.

        Biden himself would lost even harder than Kamala did.

          • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If you actually think you will get hunted down…buy a goddamn gun. Take classes, carry every day. Arm yourself and your friends.

          • missingno@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m basing my analysis on the observable trend that incumbents lose when the economy is poor. As well as, y’know, Biden’s abysmal poll numbers after the debate, the reason he dropped out in the first place.

            You’re the one who started insisting incumbent advantage would’ve been a thing here, where’s your crystal ball?

              • missingno@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                If you want to “do everything you can to win”, step one is not running the guy who was borderline incoherent in the debates. Staying by that would’ve been shooting yourself in the leg.

                Did we watch the same debate here? There was never any advantage coming out of that one.

                  • missingno@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    17 hours ago

                    You don’t have to tell me the other guy is terrible. I know he is.

                    But did you actually watch the debate? The fact that he came out of that debate arguably looking even worse than Trump - in the eyes of voters, don’t even try to argue this one - was a clear red flag.

                    There was never any ‘advantage’ here, and Biden stepped down because even he knew it.

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hey, I know you don’t know me, but I want you to know that depriving us of what you can bring will only make it worse. I’ve found that I can keep myself alive by living for the people around me. Right now what’s keeping me going is touching base with everyone, seeing how they’re doing, asking them if they’ve made any plans, and telling them about my plans to move forward. Direct action just got a whole lot harder and more dangerous, but giving up now only makes the problem worse. One foot in front of the other, until you get the rhythm, Then follow it. I believe in you.

          • Lyricism6055@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you’re able to move and see a Dr you’re doing better than most.

            I was suicidal for other reasons and found my way out of the hole I dug myself in. I honestly hope you can too. It sounds like you’re a passionate person and you can place that passion somewhere that does good for the world.

      • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Please don’t kill yourself. We need you for the revolution. Doesn’t matter who you are, what your skills are. If you can hold a gun or make soup, we need you.