Five days ago, drag was banned from !politicalmemes@lemmy.world for using neopronouns. A comment explaining drag’s pronouns, and a comment saying “drag” isn’t a nickname, were removed with the reason “trolling”. Drag understands why someone would think that using different pronouns than most people is trolling - transphobia. However, drag is confused how on earth not liking a nickname is a violation of any rules anywhere.

Context of the removed comments:

Drag would like to pre-empt any further accusations of trolling by asking a question: If drag were a right wing troll, and you chose to freely accept drag’s pronouns, wouldn’t that completely neuter the trolling attempt? Trolling is about trying to make others upset. You don’t have to get upset when someone uses unusual pronouns. If you aren’t transphobic, then it’s impossible to troll you that way. And drag promises: drag wants you to not be transphobic. Drag is not trying to upset anyone. If you do what drag wants you to do, then you get what you want too. This is a non-issue, there’s only a problem if you want there to be.

EDIT: DRAG DID NOT TELL ANYBODY TO USE DRAG’S PREFERRED PRONOUNS.

  • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Seems like an overraction tbh.

    A comment explaining drag’s pronouns

    It should be drags surely, we don’t use an apostrophe for possessive pronouns.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    YDI. You weren’t contributing to the community discussion. You turned the discussion into one about you. That’s not helpful. the moderators were correct for removing you. For no other reason than you were off topic

  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Trolling is about trying to make others upset.

    This is wrong. Trolling is about attention. Making others upset is an easy way to get attention but it’s not the only one. Gimmick accounts are another, for example.

  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Pronouns are generic by nature. A custom pronoun that applies to one person and only one person isn’t a pronoun, it’s a noun.

  • Gurfaild
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Part of what might make people think you’re trolling is that you seem to use “drag” as a first person neopronoun but conjugate your verbs as if it were third person.

    To someone who hasn’t seen this before, interpreting it as if you use a nickname to talk about yourself in third person would be the only thing that makes grammatical sense.

    Edit: this reminds me a bit of https://www.xkcd.com/169/ - you don’t come across as smug, but you’re definitely not communicating well

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Exactly this: The word “Drag” is being used to refer to a third-person in these sentences, I had to double check that it was actually the troll themselves posting this.

    • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      No, people are very used to conjugating pronouns in a way that doesn’t match their grammatical preconceptions. Take the pronoun “they”. A lot of people complain about they/them because they say it can’t be used in the singular. What they mean is, they find it difficult to conjugate properly.

      “I need to talk to Sam before they go to the store”

      “I need to talk to Sam before they goes to the store”

      The second sentence here is conjugated the same way as he or she, but it sounds wrong to us. In order to use they/them pronouns on the regular, we all had to learn that conjugation doesn’t depend on the grammatical form of the reference, but instead on the specific pronoun. “They” is conjugated differently not because it’s a plural, but because it’s “they”.

      People who have a problem with the conjugation of drag’s pronouns simply failed to think carefully about this fact. They’re having the singular they debate all over again, because they didn’t change their understanding of pronouns after they had this debate the first time. Well drag doesn’t want to have that debate all over again. Drag doesn’t think drag’s existence should lead to any sort of debate. Drag thinks people should just accept new ideas without having to be argued into accepting them. But for some reason, a lot of people see drag, and they want to be argued with.

      • Gurfaild
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        First/second person neopronouns are not like singular they because they haven’t been used for centuries already. Always using plural forms with “they” is something that English speakers learn before formally learning what a plural is (that’s why “I need to talk to Sam before they goes to the store” sounds wrong even to someone in primary school), but idiosyncratic redefinitions of grammar will always sound wrong to people who aren’t used to them.

        If your goal is to communicate effectively, you should avoid insisting on what can be easily (mis)interpreted as performative. If it isn’t, then complaining about being misunderstood is trolling.

        • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Drag has neither insisted anyone use drag’s pronouns, nor complained about being misunderstood. It seems like the scenario you’re describing as a problem hasn’t happened. Is this intended to be a warning for the future?

          • Gurfaild
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            16 hours ago

            “Drag is not using third person” may not be intended to be a complaint, but wouldn’t you say that someone who parses the sentence as you using third person misunderstands it?

            • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              16 hours ago

              They’re going to learn better eventually. It’s just a matter of how many chances they get to be respectful before they decide to stop being stubborn and mean. Drag believes that anyone will improve if they’re given enough chances. Drag is telling them the truth without judgement, and waiting to see what they choose to do with it. A lot of people have already chosen to accept the truth and stop being angry over nothing. As time goes on, the share of people who are choosing not to pick pointless fights will rise. And then the people who are still mad will get downvoted and reported and moderated, and they’ll have to give up on being stubborn. Drag is choosing patience because drag can see that future down the road. Drag doesn’t need to complain in order for that future to happen.

              • Gurfaild
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                The problem with that approach is that is is the truth from your perspective only, and nobody is going to learn better if your “explanations” just amount to “you’re wrong”. From most people’s perspective, this is indistinguishable from trolling and I don’t think comments like this or this are going to convince them otherwise - someone who deliberately uses language in a very uncommon way should probably not justify it with a dictionary.

                • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Drag believes very strongly in language. That’s why drag changes language; drag cares about it and wants to improve it. It’s like the hot rodders who love their cars and are always improving them. Or the programmers who contribute to the open source projects they love. Drag thinks drag knows a lot about language, and drag sure likes spending long hours thinking about how language works. You might say linguistics is a hobby to drag. And drag isn’t the kind of hobbyist who only studies and never tinkers.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, someone with the name “dragonfucker” using “drag” as a first person pronoun definitely doesn’t have the benefit of the doubt in my book.

    And if you list your pronouns, you are in fact asking others to use them. I don’t give a solitary shit what you call me, hence there not being any pronouns next to my name.

  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Lol, you have other comments on your profile from like 2 days before this where you refer to yourself in normal pronouns, you can’t even be consistent. If you legitimately held these opinions it’d be every time. Also the “I didn’t tell anyone to use them” while having comments where you explicitly do just that

    Your behaviour almost perfectly matches this super obsessed mega-MAGA dipshit I used to know, he’d go online and pretend to be a mega lefty in weird ways, then screenshot them on his normal accounts and use them as examples of “the insane left”

    Is that you, Stan?

    • Blaze (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Lol, you have other comments on your profile from like 2 days before this where you refer to yourself in normal pronouns, you can’t even be consistent.

      You should probably quote those if you mention them

        • Blaze (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I just had a quick look and could only find quotes such as

          “I would not…”

          Which would actually be consistent with their logic (using “they” as they allowed in a comment below)

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Their comments legitimately could be removed from the communities for all I know, just like their politics comments (might even have been in that thread)

            I scrolled a few days back, saw them speaking like a normal person in multiple comments out of quotes, and my bullshit detectors went off

            That they went on to, almost a week later, post about it being transphobic that they were banned and seem to be incapable of understanding WHY they’re not being believed only increases my certainty

            • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Here’s a comment where drag uses an “I” pronoun. It’s a quote from Doctor Who. Are you sure the comment you read wasn’t another quote from a TV show?

              • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Oh, in that one drag doesn’t use drag’s pronouns in first person, because drag is referring to somebody else in first person. Drag is suggesting what @7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com should say to their mother. 7U5K3N uses the normal set of first person pronouns, so if drag is referring to them in first person, drag should use their pronouns.

                • Blaze (he/him)
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Not arguing on that, just saying that were the only examples I found, and that they were coherent with the pronouns policy.

        • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Drag is not a guy. Drag doesn’t mind if you don’t gender drag, but please no mis-gendering. Please no applying genders that drag doesn’t have.

            • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Drag thinks discussing pronouns with you would be as useless as asking you to respect drag’s choice of identity words turned out to be, so drag had that conversation with Blaze without you. You are not invited to participate in that conversation.

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                14 hours ago

                discussing pronouns with you would be as useless as asking you

                Yeah, because you don’t understand the language and how it uses them. Not my fault you’re an idiot

                choice of identity words

                Yet another example of you either being unbelievably stupid or a troll: you called them pronouns until this comment, now suddenly they’re something different to pronouns?

                drag had that conversation with Blaze without you

                Oh god, Blaze I apologize you had to deal with them on my behalf

                You are not invited to participate in that conversation.

                Thank Satan, my brain cells are saved! Cute that you think you’re excluding me from something here, whatever makes you feel better

                • Blaze (he/him)
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Oh god, Blaze I apologize you had to deal with them on my behalf

                  It’s okay

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    YDI. Replacing ungendered pronouns and insisting on their usage by others to refer to you is, at best, being annoying for its own sake. Like that fellow who insisted that their gender was ‘droneself’, or Phlubbadubba suddenly taking up Old English.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      They didn’t insist anyone use it, they only explained it. This doesn’t merit removing comments, let alone a ban.

    • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Phlubbadubba is based and drag always thought you were based in the past when reading your comments. Maybe you misunderstood? Drag never insisted that gamermahn should use drag’s preferred pronouns. Gamermahn specifically asked, as you can see in the screenshot, and drag only replied to answer that question. The only reason there was any conflict is because Gamermahn asked a question about drag’s pronouns and then proceeded to argue with the answer. Drag didn’t do anything to antagonise them, they came into that situation looking for a fight. And drag didn’t give them one, drag calmly answered their question and used please when asking not to be called by a nickname.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    A ban is too much. They can just ignore others, if their made up words confuse them. People make up words all the time. It’s how language evolves. If someone ends up unable to communicate because of that, the situation will fix itself.

    • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Drag is quite confused why your comment is being downvoted (+2/-2 at time of comment). Apparently users on the anarchist instance think people inventing new words is too politically radical, and we need grammar police to control people’s use of language instead.

      • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        You do realize that anyone viewing this post can upvote or downvote on the comments right? It isn’t limited solely to users of db0.

  • OmegaMouse@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I hope this doesn’t come across as offensive (I appreciate that pronouns are something personal to the individual), but if I’m understanding correctly, drag is shorthand for dragon right? What about using the full word ‘dragon’ instead?

    • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Drag wants a one syllable pronoun. Two syllable pronouns take too long to say. And that also goes for subvocalisation while reading.

      Also, drag’s pronouns don’t mean dragon. Drag’s identity is dragon rider, not dragon. Drag wants a pronoun that’s associated with dragons, but not exactly dragons. Just like drag.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        22 hours ago

        There are two, gender neutral ways of referring to yourself when using the English language: “I” and “Me”, depending on where in the sentence they appear. You’re “preferred pronouns” have nothing to do with referring to yourself in the third person, which just comes off as stupid trolling.

          • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            17 hours ago

            “I am not referring to myself in the third person”

            Vs.

            “I isn’t referring to myself in the third person”,

            Vs.

            “<pronoun> isn’t referring to *self in the third person”.

            You are very clearly referring to yourself in the third person, based on how you’re conjugating your verbs.

            • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Verbs aren’t conjugated based on grammatical person, they’re conjugated based on the pronoun. You’ve made a false assumption. You should have realised that the pronoun determines conjugation based on the way we conjugate they/them pronouns. Did you notice it’s different to how we conjugate he and she?

      • RonnieB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        No one cares. Trying to bully people into this nonsense by calling them transphobic seems like the real power trip

        • yuri@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          you do not speak for everyone. plenty of folks have SOME amount of compassion, what you’re doing is more akin to bullying.

          y’know generally opening comments with “No one cares.” is like, bully shit? at the very least it’s petulant and childish.

        • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Trans rights are human rights and it takes almost zero effort to simply use someone’s preferred pronouns, even if you don’t understand the reason for it.

          From https://www.hrc.org/resources/understanding-neopronouns

          Why is it important to refer to someone by the pronouns they use?

          You should always use someone’s correct pronouns, even when they are not around, unless they specifically request that you not do so for reasons such as safety or privacy. When someone chooses to use neopronouns, they are expressing their authentic selves, and deserve our respect. The experience of being misgendered – having someone use the incorrect pronouns to refer to you – can be uncomfortable and hurtful. The experience of accidentally misgendering someone can be difficult for both parties. Neopronouns are a wonderful expression of our society’s diversity and using the correct pronouns for someone is a great way to show your allyship.

          Some people may also use multiple sets of pronouns (ex. she/they, he/she, they/fae) at all times or in certain situations. Those who use multiple sets of pronouns often feel it is necessary to express different aspects of their gender identity. When you meet someone who uses multiple pronoun sets, you may kindly ask their preferences for when and how to use each of their pronouns.

          • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 day ago

            Thank you very much for posting this. Drag would also like to add that drag is perfectly fine with not having drag’s pronouns used by others. Drag only made this post because of the ban, drag doesn’t want misgendering to be the topic of this thread.

            A bunch of people in this thread decided to feel pressured to use drag’s pronouns all on their own. Maybe that’s their consciences talking, drag doesn’t know. But they’ve decided to make it drag’s problem and drag doesn’t want that. Drag just wants to be unbanned from the place with the funny politics.

            • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              24 hours ago

              No problem. And I might just take this opportunity to ping @marcie@lemmy.ml who unfairly accused me of being “transphobic” simply for gently steering trans folks away from the Hexbear troll farm. Will she ever correct the ban reason to be “tankiephobic”? I honestly doubt it, but I guess there are PTBs everywhere right?

        • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Drag doesn’t care if the mod who did this uses drag’s pronouns. Drag cares that drag was banned from a large community for no other reason than using the pronouns to refer to dragself. Drag never bullied anyone. Why do you think that drag asking to be allowed to exist in public is bullying? The comment you’re replying to is literally drag explaining that drag uses one syllable pronouns to save you time. Drag can’t win! No matter how simple drag makes drag’s pronouns, no matter how polite, drag’s existence somehow offends people. Drag just doesn’t get it.