• mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      It’s annoying, but at least this is an independent, worker owned 4 man outfit that got its start when Vice went bankrupt.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Ya it’ll be a cold day in hell before Instagram requires men to hide their nipples. Just shows how ingrained America’s views on sex, sexuality and gender are in Christianity.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Christian tradition, sure, but the Bible doesn’t have much to say about nipples so any specific rule regarding them seems to be more of an inference than a command.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The Bible stopped being a real guide for American Christians the moment they landed on our coast

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          Technically correct, because they weren’t “American” before they landed.

          They abandoned the Bible as a real guide long before that, though.

          • themurphy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Ah yes, and then uses Jesus’ name in the same sentence as USA. The guy hated capitalism more than anything.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What does the pope have to say about nipples? I’ve seen some in Christian art (didn’t touch myself to these, just in case), but didn’t realize there was an opinion on this?

      • BMTea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        The Catechism of the Catholic Church reads:

        The forms taken by modesty vary from one culture to another. Everywhere, however, modesty exists as an intuition of the spiritual dignity proper to man. It is born with the awakening consciousness of being a subject. Teaching modesty to children and adolescents means awakening in them respect for the human person." (C.C.C. # 2524)

        People here are not serious, they repeat slogans and polemics very superficially. The nipple taboo is found across pre-Christian and non-Abrahamic societies, probably because of breasts’ association with fertility. I.e

        When did bare breasts become taboo in Western civilization?

        Probably around 3,000 years ago. Women are displayed with exposed breasts in Minoan artwork from 1500 B.C. Some historians believe that these ancient women went topless only during religious rituals—bare-breasted, buxom goddesses have been worshipped since the dawn of civilization—but some of the artworks depict everyday activities, suggesting that bare breasts may have been commonplace. Just across the Mediterranean, ancient Egyptian women sported elaborate dresses that could either cover the breasts or leave them exposed, depending on the whim of the designer. Over the next few centuries, however, breasts become strictly private parts. Ancient Athenian women were wearing flowing, multilayered robes that concealed the shape of the bosom by the middle of the first millennium B.C. Spartan attire was more risqué, exposing the female thigh, but breasts were always covered.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Small boobies = nipple ok

    Big boobies = nipple not ok

    Is what I think this Instagram is trying to say. I don’t agree and think let the boobies be free.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If women’s nipples are censored because they are considered sexual, men’s should be too. I know more than a few women who are sexuality aroused by topless men.

  • BMTea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    88
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “I’ve definitely learned that gender classifiers are an unreliable and flawed technology, especially when it comes to trans people’s gender expression,” Ada Ada Ada said. “I regularly see my algorithmic gender swing back and forth from week to week.

    Says the person changing themselves week to week to fit different classifications?

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Precisely.

      Gender isn’t binary, there is no such thing as a male or female nipple. That distinction is something that Humans made up.

      • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        To the extent that men can lactate! It’s one of the possible side effects of risperdal, which I have to be aware of because I give it fairly regularly. It’s all the same structures it’s just a matter of the hormone signals they’re getting.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I don’t understand this. We have two genders, how is it not binary and how is it made up? Honest question.

        • anon232@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Biological sex != gender. There’s not even 2 classes of biological sex. There are men born with biological female organs and women born with biologically men’s organs. We all as humans do share common organs, one of which happens to be the nipple.

          Regardless of what your actual biological sex is a gender is simply a social construct used to identify someone. A person who is “non-binary” feels that their gender does not conform to what you would typically expect of either male or female based on appearances or behavior.

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Sure but there are two major biological sexes. I can understand how gender can be defined as something else though.

            Non-binary can decide what gender they feel like.

            • BassTurd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Anyone can decide what gender they feel like. Most people identify with one of the major genders, but many people don’t for multiple possible biological reasons. Nobody is in good faith identifying as a gender they don’t actually feel like.

              • 1984@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Sure. If you define the word gender as identifying what you feel like, then it makes sense from that perspective. If I felt like my gender is someone who feels like a cat, that would be my gender then.

                • BassTurd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you had a genuine question, but I now feel that was a mistake.

        • BMTea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          Their argument is that “gender is just a social construct”, without acknowledging that some of the most paramount aspects of human existence are “social constructs” (i.e language) and that gender is one of them. And without addressing why sexual taboos (like public nudity) are gendered - to them its a form of irrational injustice. But expore the social ramifications -through real and hypothetical examples- and you quickly find that it is indeed rational to treat bodies different according to their gender, and that human social psychology does have strong roots in human phsyiognamy.

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Poster below gave you all the answer you’d ever need on this question you beg… If you have any integrity, add a note to your original comment to clarify that you were mistaken in your initial assumption and why.

          But, doesn’t seem likely that you will.

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The only thing changed between photos is clothing and pose. Is that gender? Well maybe it is, but it’s useless for classification.