• ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Haha, lets use this disaster that destroyed, and in many cases taken, people’s lives to further our agenda, haha…

    Fucking gross.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The effects of the disaster were compounded by those cars in several ways, from climate change to almost every single surface in sight being paved with a material that can’t absorb water.

      • Floods used to happen before cars. The Biblical flood story was probably based on a real flood that wiped out a civilization.

        Even within recorded history there have been floods not linked to modern (post-60’s, extinction-level) climate change.

        Cars bad, yes. But if this had been 1000 years ago, this flood could still have occurred naturally, only the results would look more like a WWII carpet bombing, with much of the city flattened. And the most hilarious thing would be that there would have been done fucker saying, “this is God’s way of saying ‘fuck people’”.

        It’s so laughable that in this day and age people run around saying “we have sinned, and are being punished for it! Repent!”

      • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Sure.

        But if you can’t make that point without punching down at people who have literally just lost everything (and who are categorically not personally responsible for climate change), maybe don’t fucking make it.

        Learn to punch up at the people actually to blame, otherwise all you are is part of the fucking problem.

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      "Maybe these people wouldn’t be suffering from as much stress and financial hardship if they weren’t carbrained pieces of fucking shit!"

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s more to do with the fact that we’ve paved over every permeable surface with concrete, be it for cars, buildings, walkways.

      We need to stop doing that. Focusing on cars exclusively as the problem rather than the problem being an urban design one in general side steps the actual issue.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        31 minutes ago

        Roads and buildings are typically the main impermeable surfaces. Sidewalks can be made of more permeable materials because they don’t need to handle nearly as much weight, tram lines only really need the rails, everything else can be permeable.

        Buildings can be built to either collect their rainwater for later use, or funnel their rain water directly to sewers, reservoirs, or directly into the ground. Buildings also tend to be more beneficial to society per square foot of land than roads are.

        Cars being the problem and urban design being the problem is practically the same thing, we’ve deaigned a significantl amount of our urban spaces specifically for cars.