• cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Touch screens should not be used for any controls needed to operate a car. You can’t use them without taking your eyes off the road.

    • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Technically the only thing you’re allowed to fiddle with, while driving, is what you can operate from the steering wheel. You’re not supposed to fiddle with radio, AC etc. from the center console while driving even if it’s physical buttons.

      I know people don’t drive like this, but you’re only allowed to take your hands off the steering wheel for changing gears if driving a manual, otherwise it’s two hands on there at all times…technically

      • ZephrC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you read the article this is specifically about things needed to operate the car. Radios and AC or whatever is fine, but car manufacturers are starting to move things actually needed like turn signals into touch controls, and that is not okay.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I, for one, would like to see single-function, physical switches for everything that isn’t specifically infotainment. I want turn signals to be a single switch, and I don’t want any other features integrated into that switch, and I want each individual module to be easily replaced.

    • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      God yes. Having ten buttons on the turn signals is a nightmare. No I don’t want to play “guess which button controls the wipers” when I sit in an unknown car for 10 minutes. Thanks.

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You know what would save many more lives than car physical controls? Mandating car mode on phones.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It amuses me to no end how here on Lemmy, with our concentration of computer nerd types, absolutely HATES touch screens in cars.

    But to be fair, I think everybody who reviews cars says they hate them too.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I never thought it would bother me, until I actually sat in a car where everything was dependent on software the first time.

      At first I thought I was just getting old. But it dawned on me that relying on software to fucking roll down the windows or starting the car doesn’t feel too good.

      (It was also an extreme jump in technology for me because the last car I drove before that was an old Corsa around the year ~2005.)

  • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The main reason why I didn’t want high end packages for our last car was, that I am a cheap bastard. The second reason is, that I think touchscreens in cars are one of the dumbest ideas imaginable.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are places where touch controls make a lot of sense. Cars is not one of them.

      My stove also has touch controls and I’d like a stern word with whomever designed it because it’s the biggest fucking bullshit. I’ve burned myself on those controls, I’ve had the stove turn itself off and refuse to turn on again because of water splashing onto the controls, I’ve had it turn on and glitch out because I’ve cleaned it off with a slightly damp rag.

      When I’m driving I absolutely don’t want to dig through non-tactile menus just so I can adjust the climate or turn on my heated seat. Plus, the lack of tactility sucks for blind people. Sure blind people won’t drive, but imagine having to ask the driver to change your AC for you? In the dark of winter with ice on the roads that’s just horribly irresponsible of whomever designed it.

      • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        When I’m driving I absolutely don’t want to dig through non-tactile menus just so I can adjust the climate or turn on my heated seat.

        Look at Mr. Fancypants over here who can afford a heated seat subscription.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The day they try to sell me a heated seat subscription is the day I put a heated blanket with a cigarette lighter plug on my seat.

      • noobnarski@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think touch controls make sense in cars, but only for navigation and advanced settings, like for how long the headlights should stay on when you leave the car, should the mirrors fold when you lock the car, stuff like that.

        Everything else should have a button.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tesla’s Model 3 uses a touchscreen for damn near everything. Some things are buried and require multiple presses in different places on the screen. It looks really good, but the actual purpose and the fact that humans driving at potentially deadly speeds need to operate it seems to have been placed a distant second to safety when the thing was designed. Given who is in charge of Tesla it’s not much of a surprise.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Personally I think that the following car functions should be mandatory physical controls - wipers, indicators, hazards, side/headlights, door locks, defogger / defroster, electronic parking brake. forward/reverse/neutral/park. And they should be controls that have fixed position in the car (i.e. not on the wheel) with positive and negative feedback.

    And fuck Tesla or any other manufacturer that wants to cheap out on a couple of bucks by removing them. Removing physical controls has obvious safety implications to drivers who are distracted trying to find icons on a tablet.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I assume steering too, right?

      i.e. a “If you brick your car’s firmware, at least you can keep driving without unreasonable levels of difficulty or distraction” situation.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If you brick your car’s firmware, at least you can keep driving without unreasonable levels of difficulty or distraction

        That’s impossible for a large portion of safety critical systems. Engines don’t run without a controller, they literally control the fuel injection valves (and have done so for decades). Brake systems have physical failsafes for when the electronics die (I.e. basic hydraulics without the booster), but you should not be able to move a vehicle without a working brake system after it stopped.

        The shitton of software running modern cars is there for good reason (at least large chunks of it), lots of which is safety, especially in the drivetrain.

        It’s completely different for infotainment, which I agree the vehicle should be able to function without (although the dashboard must work)

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d rather have a keyboard mounted on the steering wheel and operate the car with bash aliases.

    • Markimus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I do agree with you, though why not just not buy cars which have touch screen controls? You don’t need legislation to filter your purchases.

      • ceiphas@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because it is a dependency for most things that buyers want in their cars. Not a technical dependency but cou cannot get Climate Control without a Touch screen in Some Cars for example.

        doesn’t make sense

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      IMO the capacititive buttons with no feedback are even worse than the touch screen. at least with the touch screen, you will likely have a colored UI element on screen to press. with the cars that replace all the buttons with capacitive buttons with no feedback, theyre all the same color.

      • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        no feedback? 🤔

        either the button or an indicator lights up or you see/hear what the button is supposed to activate or stop

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          *haptic feedback. The touch and press should be two different actions, not the same action. Otherwise, you need to look at a button to know where it is and if it did what it was supposed to do, which distracts you from driving.

          Touchscreens are not that much better in this regard, IMO

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d be fine with one that works like the Taptic engine on iPhones or how ever the trackpad on my Macbook does. It’s a solid surface with no moving parts but it clicks when you press it and it feels 100% the same as pressing a physical button. It’s way different than haptic feedback done with just the vibrator motor.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          That doesn’t work well in a car though. It works in a phone because you’re holding it, or a trackpad because you’re putting a lot of pressure on it. In a car it’s already shaking from the engine, road, etc. Plus those taps are generally much shorter and lighter and less likely to feel the vibration.