Als Profi geht es ja auch darum, immer an der Grenze zu fahren, manchmal kommt man dann auch darüber.
Als Profi geht es ja auch darum, immer an der Grenze zu fahren, manchmal kommt man dann auch darüber.
Every commercial fuel recycling plant in existence releases large amounts of radioactivity into the air and water, so I dont really see them as a good alternative.
Here is a world map of iodine 129 before fukushima, its one of many radioactive isotopes released at nuclear reprocessing plants: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/images/iupac/j_pac-2015-0703_fig_076.jpg The website where I got it from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/element/Iodine#section=Isotopes-in-Forensic-Science-and-Anthropology
Considering how long it would take to build safe reactors, how expensive it would be and how much radioactive contamination would be created both at the production of fuel and later when the storage ever goes wrong after thousands of years, I just dont see any reason to ever invest into it nowadays, when renewables and batteries have gotten so good.
Yeah, I visited sweden once, where I camped in nature. The cities were meh, but the nature was very nice.
In the east maybe, its definetly not bad at all in northern germany (Schleswig Holstein).
Well, the drill bit wont fit if the hole is too long and thin, so its not always quite that easy.
The allies gave us germans a stronger constitution than they themselves have as far as I understand it.
I think we should support Ukraine when the war is over, but we first have to support them in winning it.
What about having a life support system connected?