You didn’t though. You replied to me saying this:

What did Clinton do? You mean aside from keeping his mouth shut about being offered an underage girl?

Teile davon sind Suchtmittel, Sucht als Krankheit ist oft folge von Realitätsflucht, der Wunsch danach wiederum ist oft vorhanden wenn dein Leben Grade Scheisse läuft.

Kosmetikprodukte sind sehr vage da könnte auch z.B. Shampoo drunter fallen. Diese und Rasierklingen als Mittel zum sauberen auftreten sind in unserer Gesellschaft quasi Pflicht um überhaupt irgendwo Respekt zu erhalten. Das gehört zur Gesellschaftlichen Teilhabe die wir allen gewähren sollten.

Energydrinks und Kaffee werden von Erwachsenen meistens konsumiert weil sie in ihrem Leben zu viel gestresst werden. Zu lange Schichten, zu wenig Möglichkeiten zu schlafen, trotzdem schnell und zuverlässig arbeiten müssen. Siehe Paketdienste o.ä. diese Zustände sind auch gerade da üblich wo sehr sehr wenig verdient wird.

Die wenigsten dieser Menschen fühlen sich gut dabei zu stehlen. Ihnen ist klar dass sie das nicht tun müssen sollten sehen sich aber trotzdem gezwungen.

In this specific case I agree, not reporting CSA should be illegal (and probably is?) I’m not so sure that we should codify the current ethical understanding into law though.

We need to leave room for development. Forcing new ideas to first go through the battle of legalization isn’t helpful in this regard. Laws are there to regulate what normal social regulation can’t do properly.

I think people who cheat on their partners are morally speaking bad people. But writing into law you can’t have multiple partners at once is quite obviously a bad decision, because there are happy polyamourus relationships. The government doesn’t need to get involved here, being treated like the ass that you are for cheating is punishment enough, and leaves the room for developing new ways of living together.

Bro the guy was literally “the leader of the free world” and said nothing about his friend selling children to child diddlers and you are going to come at me with a “but akchually WHICH LAW DID HE BREAK?!?!?!?”. Go piss.

What did Clinton do? You mean aside from keeping his mouth shut about being offered an underage girl?

The point being trump would set the bar very low anyways

Yeah they were experimenting with 64bit exploitation when this signal handler got some focus regarding a (likely related) deadlock so they rushed to disclose their findings to the project to minimise the possibility of having eyes on this vulnerability

It’s not like trump is known to not stoop below any bar he sees. Holding the bar up won’t do anything

Well building bombs on the other hand is very lucrative. As long as you keep a few zones of earth as playgrounds for these bombs

Is that so? I thought one main staple of military ranks was that if the soldier rejects an order because of judicial concerns but the superior tells them to do it anyways the judicial blame is on that superior

Does a member of the military have the right to refuse the direct order of the president?

You just have a chain of unprovable assumptions there.

Kid’s use slang -> they must have picked it up on the internet -> many people are illiterate -> the parents of these specific kids are not raising them right

Excuse me the correct slang here would be to hit someone with that “hawk tuah”

Hm ich hatte immer die gute “Ranz-light” Aussprache im Kopf

I guess it’s also my bad. After reading the text with a more neutral mindset it’s not that clear cut as I initially read it. My bs detector tends to get a bit sensitive when AI comes up and I interpreted the wording in the worst way possible.

So even if what you’re insinuating were true: do you really want to vote for the corrupt and stupid rather than the corrupt and smart? I’d at least trust the corrupt and smart people to run the country in a way that doesn’t lead to catastrophic failure.

The point being that tweets like the one in question are designed to do the opposite. They are designed to pull attention towards the knives and never to look at the leech.

I agree they are different things, I just wanted to object to this being an abstract problem. It’s a very practical one with very practical solutions. They do take time to implement though because it takes organised action.

Also, separate comment because it’s a separate thing. The analogy is actually perfect. We should be worrying about both things, the knife and the leech. The knife needs more immediate attention because the leech is actually pretty good at keeping it’s wound clean and not kill the host immediately.

The problem I have with the sentiment of the tweet of the bank is the very likely intended focus on just the one side of this issue. Part of why this is a long-winded social issue is because many people don’t take the time to analyse the situation more broadly. Because they have to deal with all the knives in their arms, and get reminded of yet more knives, that the leech can’t ever become the focus of the attention.

The leech is the company you are working for. Companies are getting away with paying you so little because you are removing every little expense that is still left in your life. Fighting for better pay is very much practical.