• taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like that they have to use median, because I’m often having to find examples of why you’d use that over mean. My wife for instance is over 5k miles from her mom, and I imagine that’s true of most immigrants. So the skew is probably really, really strong if you didn’t use a non parametric measure like the median.

    In other words, I’m stealing this for my stats class.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like using both. An average of say 300 miles with a median of 5 miles would show you that there is significant bias toward the lower end.

      I’m not a statistician but that’s my understanding of the two metrics

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah but you can’t really do that with a map. In a table you could. A report would likely report both, but also differentiate groups because you don’t usually want to report skewed data without explaining why.

        • DrunkenPirate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I bet if go down to county or city level, you‘ll find differently colored areas such as cities relying on old steel, coal, textile economies. At least here in Germany I know areas where many people left their home areas in the 90ies. But that’s probably a geography lesson.

          • taiyang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yup! And if you have the right dashboard you can usually drill down by location down to that level and even include those additional factors as an overlay. I used to do that using census and labor statistics data, and it is indeed very cool.