• blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly, the real question to me is how many innocent people were maimed, injured, or killed in this attack. This is incredibly indiscriminate, even though the idea is that only the bad guys are holding the pages or walkie-talkies, but if they’re in a cafe they’re not the only ones getting hurt. Think of it as attaching an explosive to a thousand Hezbollah people, and then exploding them as they wander through a city. That’s the true crime, the potentially disproportionate massacre of innocent civilians.

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Agree, I am incredibly disturbed by the nature of this attack and the implications for how other countries might use this idea.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Several of the victims were children. They went off in crowds. There was no way they could control that many devices with precision when they set them off all at once like that.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            That particular pager was in a bag, against a person, pointed away from anyone or anything else. Not to mention anything of the second attack, which used much larger charges and started fires and blew out windows across Lebanon.

            And anyway, a single example isn’t going to assuage anyone who has been reading reports of women and children dying from the attack.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            The mental gymnastics people will do to defend literal state sponsored terrorism.

            And don’t waste your time, I actually know what those words mean.

          • Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            37
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            The fathers of these dead children will simply have to live with the terrible consequences of their involvement with antisemitic terror

            So the children have to pay for their father’s crimes? This isn’t really a justification, and they don’t not care, now they have a real reason for retaliation—starting the cycle of hate all over again.

              • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                And you complain about pro Israel accounts getting banned. Literally justifying the murder of children should be banable no matter what county you’re supporting. Despicable behavior that everyone now sadly expects from rabid genocide supporters.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            The kid’s blood is still on whoever triggered the devices hands. The child didn’t do anything.

            Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed? I can’t find anything making that claim.

            • irreticent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed?

              They keep citing a tweet while others keep refuting what they’re saying with articles from BBC, NPR, and other news outlets. There’s no point in arguing with someone that can’t provide reputable sources for their claims.

              *Edit: typo

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                First article I pulled up:

                https://www.npr.org/2024/09/20/g-s1-23812/lebanon-israel-exploding-pagers-hezbollah-international-law

                Many, but not all, of the pagers and walkie-talkies that unexpectedly blew up over two days across Lebanon and in some neighboring countries were in the possession of Hezbollah fighters, functionaries or allies. In this photo, an ambulance believed to be carrying wounded people drives down a street in a southern suburb of Beirut on September 18, 2024. The ambulance is white with a blue light on top that spans the width of the vehicle. Men stand on the sides of the street, which is lined with buildings. Middle East crisis — explained Another wave of blasts hits Lebanon, as Hezbollah reels from pager explosions

                The group is designated as a terrorist organization by several nations, including the United States, but many of its members and supporters operate in civilian areas across Lebanon — and some of the explosions left innocent bystanders, including children, injured or dead.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                They are asking for the source of your statement that less then 0.1% of the victims where valid targets. Since most have seen evidence to the exact opposite of that statement.

                Oh and although I can put links to back that statement up, I will not. (Since that is the presiding fashion here apparently)

                  • Klear@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    When asked for a source, you’re asked to link to a specific statement or report. If you just say who is your source without providing a link, it looks like not only do you don’t have any, but that you don’t have any idea of what you’re talking about.

                    It’s extremely damaging to your side, no matter where the truth is.

                  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    The same Hezbollah that claim this was an “act of war” and in nothing I can find give any indication of non Hezbollah casualties? Once again I can link the translated statement from Hezbollah to support this, but since you for some reason will not neither will I.

                    Oh and to show this is not a lack of effort by myself here is a link to the information on Vitamin D toxicity