• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Several of the victims were children. They went off in crowds. There was no way they could control that many devices with precision when they set them off all at once like that.

        • Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          The fathers of these dead children will simply have to live with the terrible consequences of their involvement with antisemitic terror

          So the children have to pay for their father’s crimes? This isn’t really a justification, and they don’t not care, now they have a real reason for retaliation—starting the cycle of hate all over again.

            • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              And you complain about pro Israel accounts getting banned. Literally justifying the murder of children should be banable no matter what county you’re supporting. Despicable behavior that everyone now sadly expects from rabid genocide supporters.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          The kid’s blood is still on whoever triggered the devices hands. The child didn’t do anything.

          Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed? I can’t find anything making that claim.

          • irreticent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Do you have a source stating that no bystanders were harmed?

            They keep citing a tweet while others keep refuting what they’re saying with articles from BBC, NPR, and other news outlets. There’s no point in arguing with someone that can’t provide reputable sources for their claims.

            *Edit: typo

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              First article I pulled up:

              https://www.npr.org/2024/09/20/g-s1-23812/lebanon-israel-exploding-pagers-hezbollah-international-law

              Many, but not all, of the pagers and walkie-talkies that unexpectedly blew up over two days across Lebanon and in some neighboring countries were in the possession of Hezbollah fighters, functionaries or allies. In this photo, an ambulance believed to be carrying wounded people drives down a street in a southern suburb of Beirut on September 18, 2024. The ambulance is white with a blue light on top that spans the width of the vehicle. Men stand on the sides of the street, which is lined with buildings. Middle East crisis — explained Another wave of blasts hits Lebanon, as Hezbollah reels from pager explosions

              The group is designated as a terrorist organization by several nations, including the United States, but many of its members and supporters operate in civilian areas across Lebanon — and some of the explosions left innocent bystanders, including children, injured or dead.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              They are asking for the source of your statement that less then 0.1% of the victims where valid targets. Since most have seen evidence to the exact opposite of that statement.

              Oh and although I can put links to back that statement up, I will not. (Since that is the presiding fashion here apparently)

                • Klear@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  When asked for a source, you’re asked to link to a specific statement or report. If you just say who is your source without providing a link, it looks like not only do you don’t have any, but that you don’t have any idea of what you’re talking about.

                  It’s extremely damaging to your side, no matter where the truth is.

                • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The same Hezbollah that claim this was an “act of war” and in nothing I can find give any indication of non Hezbollah casualties? Once again I can link the translated statement from Hezbollah to support this, but since you for some reason will not neither will I.

                  Oh and to show this is not a lack of effort by myself here is a link to the information on Vitamin D toxicity