• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are asking for the source of your statement that less then 0.1% of the victims where valid targets. Since most have seen evidence to the exact opposite of that statement.

    Oh and although I can put links to back that statement up, I will not. (Since that is the presiding fashion here apparently)

      • Klear@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        When asked for a source, you’re asked to link to a specific statement or report. If you just say who is your source without providing a link, it looks like not only do you don’t have any, but that you don’t have any idea of what you’re talking about.

        It’s extremely damaging to your side, no matter where the truth is.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        The same Hezbollah that claim this was an “act of war” and in nothing I can find give any indication of non Hezbollah casualties? Once again I can link the translated statement from Hezbollah to support this, but since you for some reason will not neither will I.

        Oh and to show this is not a lack of effort by myself here is a link to the information on Vitamin D toxicity

        • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Your argumentation genuinely made me lol, thanks for that. I especially enjoyed the vitamin d article substitution

          • czech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You wrote that fewer than .1% of casualties from the detonations were not hezbollah. When asked for a source you wrote: hezbollah. When pressed for a source you’ve now countered: “why would hezbollah report that?”.

            We don’t know; it’s your premise. Where did you get that stat?

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Didn’t you say they were the ones who reported your non-Hezbollah casualty figure though?

            You could just link to what you’re talking about, that might clear up any confusion.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, and that would be why we are wondering how that would be proof of a lack of non-Hezbollah casualties.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Oh good thing you told us where that info was then. Its not like the numbers of victims are still unknown or unaccounted for. Its also great that you provided all that evidence of “guilt” for everyone injured.

                  • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    It’s hundreds of explosions, some of which were in cars (presumably causing car accidents) and crowded areas. It was terrifying. Victims may not want to come forward since it connects them with a group of people being targeted with fucking bombs, something they personally witnessed. They don’t want to be next. Or they don’t want people to think their deceased loved one was a terrorist.