• Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes, this is a feature of the fediverse, and we’re celebrating it here.

    When shitty toxic communities create issues for the wider Lemmyverse, instance admins can lay down some ultimatums.

    On the toxic community’s instance, the instance’s admins can demand that the toxic community correct their behavior, or the community and its offending users will get banned.

    On other instances, offending communities can be blocked, and if users are regularly misbehaving, instance admins can pressure each other to enforce basic community conduct, or face defederation.

    Once a community is given an ultimatum, they can either change their behavior to meet the expectations of the wider Lemmyverse, or they can find an instance that will allow their behavior.

    If they choose to migrate to another instance, it will likely be a more extremist instance with poor moderation that has been significantly defederated. They have to exist within that narrow network of fringe instances now, giving them significantly less reach to harass or spread disinfo or whatever got them booted from the last place they called home.

    And us users play a central role here. When we see communities doing harm, whether they are endorsing fascism, or pedophilia, or animal abuse, we need to stay “not here you don’t” and demand that action be taken.

    When those communities end up migrating to some fringe instance full of dipshits, we need to applaud the mods and admins that sent them there, and let them know that their hard work was appreciated.

    Federation works. Every fringe community in exile is proof of that. This is all one big community effort, so we can’t stay silent about what’s happening and expect that it all gets taken care of behind the scenes.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If they choose to migrate to another instance, it will likely be a more extremist instance with poor moderation that has been significantly defederated.

      In theory this is how it should work, but in practice the toxic people tend to move to general purpose more laissez-faire places like .world or .ml, which makes de-federating and cutting off 30% of all users a difficult decision for anyone trying to have a community.

      The answer is less centralization, but that can’t be forced. beehaw.org (for example) made the decision to cut off .world and they are better for it. But they are a large-ish instance in their own right.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        So if you dont agree with someone they are an extremist, got it.

        You are aware vegan cats exist right? Like its already a thing, and its being studied.

        https://news.uoguelph.ca/2021/03/u-of-g-researchers-first-to-study-health-effects-of-vegan-diets-on-cats/

        Y’all are so confidently wrong about stuff its crazy, and then y’all pat yourselves in the back for all grouping up and agreeing together.

        Just because a lot of people are on one side of a position does not make it the right position, you must be aware there is more to think about right?

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I didn’t say extremist I said toxic but really anyone who’s poorly socialized will go where they’re allowed, which in Lemmy terms means general catch-all instances with loose moderation like .world and .ml.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      One study estimated 1% of cat owners feed their cat a vegan diet. Why do you think that might be? Are they all extremist animal abusers? Or is it possible you had an assumption that turned out to be wrong and now don’t know how to reconcile?

      • knatsch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        One study estimated

        ok, you already lost me

      • yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yes, if you are not feeding your pet a proper diet and are allowing it to suffer, you are an animal abuser.

    • Beaver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nah, eating and using animals is the extremist way of doing things.