Ukraine has ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Wednesday, opening the possibility of more prosecutions of Russian officials for war crimes

Freedom and democracy going wild again:

However, many Ukrainians feared that ratification of the Rome Statute could allow the ICC to prosecute Ukrainian citizens participating in the armed conflict on Ukrainian territory.

To reflect those concerns, the legislation contains a clause that says Ukraine will not recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction in cases where the crimes may have been committed by Ukrainian nationals.

  • aleats@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    24·
    21 days ago

    Isn’t the entire point of the Rome Statute that the country accepts the court’s jurisdiction involving international crimes and crimes against humanity as higher than that of any national court? I’m not an expert, but I imagine this defeats the point of signing the statute in the first place.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      21 days ago

      Yes, that’s why many countries, like the US, haven’t ratified the Rome Statute. They refuse to accept anything they don’t control as having jurisdiction over their country or citizens.

  • Codex@lemmy.world
    611·
    21 days ago

    “Yeah man, we’re totally down to bring justice to those monsters accused of doing war crimes! Woah wait, I mean, except when we do a war crime, that’s alright, we have good reasons.”

    Ah, they grow up so fast! Just like big brother USA! 🥲🇺🇲🦅

      • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
        31·
        20 days ago

        Court without teeth and a court without any benefits. Sentencing war criminals can be done by the regular courts in said country. The people committing war crimes are usually in countries that don’t send them to said court or actively protect them.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          1·
          20 days ago

          Except that in cases where issues are supra national this helps. Could a local court do it, sure. But in this case enforcement is done by signatory countries within their own borders. This means people wanted cannot travel to any signatory country. Which is not nothing in my book.

          And depending on the resolve of a country that has a pending case, a wanted person hiding in a country that is not a signatory, might wake up in the trunk of a car parked in the Hague one day. And the court publicly convicted and jailed several high profile war criminals.

          So our definition of useless is different.

          Edit: Don’t let perfect get in the way of good.