• GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would like to say “oh does this mean that one day we might play all of f:nv in a better game engine?”

    But then I remembered an experience I had recently. I tried playing Fallout4 on my PC with my 144Hz display but with a frame rate cap of 60fps set by MangoHud. The technical experience was one of worst I’ve ever seen in gaming in this way. Plenty of other games can handle this setup just fine, but Fallout 4 ended up being a jittery, unsatisfactory mess.

    And that’s not to say NV runs great. You need a tick fix mod and possibly some others, but once you have those in place it performs well enough.

  • PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    New Vegas had one of the best settings in the 3D games but the gunplay in Fallout 4 was much better. Hopefully there is a full conversion of this.

    • ISOmorph@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never understood the recurring argument that gunplay in Fallout 4 is better than 3. 3 and NV are built around VATS while gunplay is an afterthought, and 4 turned that around. It’s like comparing apples and oranges.

      • Fraylor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reliance on vats is a problem. It should be a tool, not a solution.

        • ISOmorph@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s just an opinion, not an objective truth. Fact is, VATS was implemented in 3 and NV because it’s a Fallout staple and basically was the core combat mechanic in 1 and 2. In my opinion VATS is one of the many things that made 3 and NV better than the more recent iterations

          • PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Aiming was not a core mechanic in the first two Fallouts. It’s actually an underused mechanic because one of the best traits disables it. VATS lasily tries to combine the aiming system and the turn based mode of the originals and fails. Fallout 4 did VATS better.

            Bethesda admitted VATS was included because they couldn’t get a hang of guns in thier engine.

            New Vegas devs disliked the implementing of VATS and improved the gun play in several ways.

            • ISOmorph@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fallout 4 did VATS better.

              Again, just another opinion formulated as if it is fact. To me VATS was not usable in 4 but 3 and NV did it perfectly

                • ISOmorph@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I played NV for several hundreds of hours. I can’t remember a single popup that said “please don’t use VATS”. But that’s beside the point anyway. It’s the same implementation as in 3 and it was just right for me.