• Fraylor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The reliance on vats is a problem. It should be a tool, not a solution.

    • ISOmorph@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s just an opinion, not an objective truth. Fact is, VATS was implemented in 3 and NV because it’s a Fallout staple and basically was the core combat mechanic in 1 and 2. In my opinion VATS is one of the many things that made 3 and NV better than the more recent iterations

      • PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aiming was not a core mechanic in the first two Fallouts. It’s actually an underused mechanic because one of the best traits disables it. VATS lasily tries to combine the aiming system and the turn based mode of the originals and fails. Fallout 4 did VATS better.

        Bethesda admitted VATS was included because they couldn’t get a hang of guns in thier engine.

        New Vegas devs disliked the implementing of VATS and improved the gun play in several ways.

        • ISOmorph@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fallout 4 did VATS better.

          Again, just another opinion formulated as if it is fact. To me VATS was not usable in 4 but 3 and NV did it perfectly

            • ISOmorph@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I played NV for several hundreds of hours. I can’t remember a single popup that said “please don’t use VATS”. But that’s beside the point anyway. It’s the same implementation as in 3 and it was just right for me.