• hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Now go watch hbomberguy’s video about plagiarism to be aware of how much of this Internet Historians video is stolen.

        • hOrni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Maybe not surprising, but still disappointing. I liked IH videos, but knowing that a lot of it is stolen, puts a stain on it. But at least it explains why his videos tend to disappear from his channel.

          Edit: The IH part starts at around 1:25:00 and lasts 20 minutes.

          • bort@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            guy covers historical event doesn’t rewrite history, instead takes what someone else has written about event doesn’t use own fotos, uses someone elses foto instead makes mistakes

            I am not saying this is a big nothing burger, but his only real mistakes was not to list his sources.

            • d2k1@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah, no. He almost entirely verbatim copied the text and wording on the original article and shuffled some words around to try and make it less obvious (and failed). It is blatant plagiarism, there is no other way to call it. This was no innocent mistake of forgetting to list a source. Watch the hbomberguy video segment about it, it paints a very clear picture.

              • bort@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                It is blatant plagiarism

                yes, and a solution could have been to cite sources.

                This was no innocent mistake of forgetting to list a source

                I don’t think, that not-citing-sources is an innocent mistake.

                Watch the hbomberguy video segment about it, it paints a very clear picture

                I did. I does paint a very colorful picture. Full of opinion and sarcasm and rhethoric.

                Here is a rule-of-thumb to decide if an argument was convincing because it had good content, or because it was well written: If the content was good, it will be easy for you explain to a 3rd party. If only the presentation was good, then you will have a hard time convincing others.

  • Wirrvogel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The story about a man stuck in a cave that gave me nightmares forever, after watching the video, this new story can’t hurt me anymore:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnI_oZKxzl0
    Watch it, the way the story is told is great, a classic! 10/10 nightmares, will watch again!

    Edit: I was made aware that the video plagiarised heavily an article by someone else, so I leave the link to the original work here too: https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/544782/1925-cave-rescue-that-captivated-the-united-states-floyd-collins

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    We should really have a spelunking agency go around closing off these “no room to turn around” passageways because as fun as these caver types are personally, they’re also the kind of morons who see a very obviously dangerous hole off the recommended path and think “LEZZDOIIIIIIIIT!” Basically most of the cast of “As Above So Below”, “What’s that, this supposed passageway to hell is shifting in ways to reveal passages that are unknown even to this expert catacomb guide despite his tag being on the walls? LET’S KEEP GOING!”