• FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Hey big shoutout to all the Redditors and Lemmy guys who told me that we can have no restrictions on free speech because if we restrict Nazis they will restrict us if they ever gain power.

    Welp, here ya go…like I told you…and many of you blocked and/or banned me for saying it. Ironic.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      i felt like the trolls on reddits are just RU stoking anger and division.

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You’ll never easily get through to those people. They hold idealism over material reality in many cases.

      The best way I’ve found to get even some of them to at least stop and think for a minute is to ask if preventing people from doing things like:

      1. Screaming slurs next to a preschool
      2. Publishing deliberately false information to ruin someone’s reputation
      3. Doxxing someone who was mean to you

      …is justified. If they say yes, then maybe unlimited free speech isn’t perfect, and restricting Nazis could be justified. If they say no, then you’ll know they’re a lost cause.

        • Oggyb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Great question. Intention matters, so many countries focus on speech that can only be malicious, like incitement to violence in the UK or Nazi salutes in Germany.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      18 hours ago

      if? people have already been blackbagged for their speech. this is just encoding something already in effect.

  • Charlxmagne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    19 hours ago

    How tf can u ban a boycott, how is that even possible let alone provable 🤦 Politics aside if I js don’t like a brand that endorses or has ties to Israel would I then be subject to charges. How u trynna force people to buy from certain companies, what if I was bruk, would I be breaking the law? 🤡

  • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Amendment I

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And the USSC has definitely ruled that money is equivalent to speech. So boycott activity is logically covered under this Amendment.

      If this law passes, a lot of people are going to have a rough year or two until they can get a case all the way to the Supreme Court.

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Is that legal? It doesn’t sound legal. I’m sure they could make it illegal for US government agencies to boycott Israel because that’s at least partially a foreign policy decision, but private businesses? What are they gonna do, force you to buy Israeli goods?

  • SaharaMaleikuhm
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    24 hours ago

    How do I boycott Israel in the first place? Not booking my next vacation there? Do I get 20 years in prison for that?

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The best I have managed to do is not buying some hand tools from a company based there. I’m sure they are really missing that $100, lol.

    • Splenetic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It seems like theatre. How will you ever prove that I chose Burger King over McDonalds for political reasons?

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t eat meat. BK has Impossible burgers and McD’s doesn’t. Of course they’ve been coming after synthetic meat too in some places. They’re throwing a fit because a single-digit % of the population had the audacity to opt out of eating meat derived from animals.

        • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I am not vegan or vegetarian, but I still prefer Impossible burgers (and Impossible chicken patties) and Beyond Steak bites. Not only does it at least significantly reduce my meat consumption, it is generally better than the real meat, since it doesn’t have any weird bits and is lower in bad cholesterol. Also, it makes it so the meat I do eat can be sourced more ethically (buying direct from the rancher, hunting and fishing my own for subsistence, getting free range eggs especially from locals) instead of getting the final product and just ignoring what torture went into it.

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      24 hours ago

      They make a surprising amount of things. I noticed a woodworking tool I have was made in Israel. Never expected that.

      • dufkm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I have a plastic table I use for woodworking and general carpentry that I later found out might be made in Israel, the brand is Keter. I see they sell lots of outdoor storage solutions locally as well, will avoid that brand in the future. Out of interest, what did you buy so I know what to look out for?

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 day ago

    Didn’t CU rule that spending money is free speech? So isn’t compelling the spending of money compelling speech? Sounds straight up unconstitutional.(as if that fucking matters these days)

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Rich people spending money is free speech.

      Anti-genocide activists not spending money is terrorism.

      AKA the usual.

  • RidderSport
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Wait you first blame us for not having free speach, because lying about the holocaust is illegal and now you ban boycotting Israel for engaging in a de facto genocide?

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    1 day ago

    How do you outlaw a boycott? It’s not an act, it’s a non-act. An absence of a purchase. How do you distinguish boycott from just not buying something you don’t want or need like any other item. Are we going to be required to put so much of our purchases toward Isreal now?