stolen from linux memes at Deltachat

  • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Arch is easy to install; it’s a headache to manage.

    If you want a stable Arch, you need to check the updates and take very granular control over packages and versioning.

    While some nerds may like tinkering with their system in all those ways, for regular user Arch is simply too much effort to maintain.

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Useful, but still it kinda makes you read through all the update news, which is…why?

        I’d like to just hit update and not bother.

        • corship@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Then you’re on your own. What the duck 🦆 do you expect to happen if you can’t even invest the 10sec to skim over a message (in the few events that there even is one) to see if it affects you and any manual intervention is required.

          • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            A fully functional system, just like any other normal OS?

            You hit update - boom - you get one, seamlessly, with no breakages and no other user interaction. And that’s how it works pretty much everywhere - except, you know, Arch.

            If you’re fine with it - that’s fine, go ahead and tinker all you like. But don’t expect others to have the same priorities.

              • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Man that’s news from 2016, like, it’s a bit rare occasion, y’know. You’re way more likely to get borked by Arch even after reading all the instructions, and it did happen numerous times.

                Touching grass is what I do when you take steps to intervene in your system to make an update work.

                I see you are an Arch maximalist, but that goes beyond reason. Even Arch proponents are normally not as aggressive on the topic, and admit Arch is too complicated in that regard.

                • corship@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  You’re just going to shift goalposts every time I’ll post something.

                  Not recent enough. Not enough cases. That’s different.

                  And lastly you’ll just claim I do it because I’m an arch maximalist, despite not knowing anything about me :)

  • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Isn’t archwiki one of the most comprehended wikis for Linux distros out there? If anything, the arch-wiki (to me) has often too many answers for the same problem than the other way around.

  • Xavier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    That reminds me, some time ago I tried installing Garuda on a Ryzen 5800H based mini PC but there where so many issues (namely worrisome graphical artefacting, which has never occurred with other distros on the same mini PC) I had to abort and abandon trying it until maybe the next or a future release.

    I simply wanted to check out Garuda (arch based, if I recall well). I used the Cinnamon iso with Ventoy (not sure where the issue arose from).

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s weird. I have had zero issues with it so far (talking about distro specific issues) and I am running this with an AMD APU, Nvidia GPU, prime offloading on wayland. Works like an absolute charm. Though granted, this isn’t quite out of the box, you may not need to be a wizard to figure it out, but I would not recommended this to a noob.

  • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Arch is great, but I’m too lazy to learn how to set it up. Once it’s running I think Arch is amazing. I just use Garuda Linux and love it. The Arch wiki is an amazing ressource.

  • SrTobi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Don’t know what people have? The last time wifi didnt work out of the box for me was like 2010

    • Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Archintstall sometimes produces problems(at least I had problems with it). Make sure that you have the current iso version of arch on your stick and try again.

      • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The problem I was facing was manually creating partitions. Should I use Gparted to make them first and then use archinstall, or does it not work with manual partitions?

        • Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          It should work with both ways. First time I did them with archinstall(but didn’t like that it created a separate partition for my home directory). Second time I manually partitioned my drive and then let archintstall use that.

  • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve only ever had two problems with Arch based systems…

    1. Nvidia drivers…
    2. Installing poorly create aur packages…
  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I had a friend who wanted to try linux but insisted on arch because it’s what I used at the time even though I said they shouldn’t and gave many suggestions for better distros. They gave up after about a day and went back to windows. I don’t know what they expected, multiple people warned them not to use arch.

    • Vegoon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      multiple people warned them not to use arch.

      My IT Bros said the same back when I had to choose W10 or Linux, they haven’t used arch and I had 0 Linux experience. I messed up every single step of the installation to a point where I knew from the problems I created what I did wrong. After many tries and a week later I had a working installation with dual boot. Never used windows and removed it a year later. It was rough but I learned how to recover from most errors a user can create.

      If learning is the goal arch and arch-wiki is great.

  • Titou@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Wiki do not have answer” that’s why the wiki is also used by non-arch users ?

  • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wiki do not have answer

    ?? The arch wiki is one of the greatest Linux resources out there. Sure there may be situations where it doesn’t have the answer for something, but for a new user? It has all bases covered.

    • Titou@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      im pretty sure the OP never took a look at Arch and just follow the hate movement

  • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    So if someone starts using EndeavorOS daily, can they claim to be an arch user? Edit: I’m now wiping my laptop clean and using it as my daily driver from now on. This is probably my first experience with Plasma, and I am loving it way more than gnome so far.

    • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yup my best Plasma experience was on Manjaro, Arch based KDE is just good. But actually modern KDE at all is just good, so no Kubuntu or damn MXLinux XD

      • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh my God the more I use it the more amazing it is already. The customization in the Plasma appearance settings is exactly what I’ve missed this whole time. I feel like I’ve wasted all these years now. Better late than never I s’pose.

        • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Hahahaha. I tried out Mint once, crashed randomly so no Mint. Then Manjaro and it was great but said to be shady. So MX Linux which was also great but software was outdated. Then KDENeon and Kubuntu, broke both, then Fedora KDE, broke that too.

          Now I am on Fedora Kinoite, KDE is all user folders so everything is still customizable.

          You may want to disable file indexing as its really weird and crashy. For security also CUPS and bluetooth, no GUI switches poorly

          • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I’ve done a lot of bluetooth work and know how terrible it is as a protocol, but do you see any issues with only using it for a speaker/earphone, assuming no other devices even within a valid proximity of the transceiver? If nothing can hijack or manipulate or listen to the session, is it that insecure? I disable it and use wired earbuds when I’m mobile for that reason.

            • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              You can be tracked as you glow like a flashlight in the dark. But its not insecure I guess, but dont use it for keyboard to be sure.