So I’ve recently taken an interest in these three distros:

All of these offer something very interesting:
Access to (basically) all Linux-capable software, no matter from what repo.

Both NixOS and blendOS are based on config files, from which your system is basically derived from, and Vanilla OS uses a package manager apx to install from any given repo, regardless of distribution.

While I’ve looked into Fedora Silverblue, that distro is limited to only install Flatpaks (edit: no, not really), which is fine for “apps”, but seems to be more of a problem with managing system- and CLI tools.

I haven’t distro hopped yet, as I’m still on Manjaro GNOME on my devices.


What are your thoughts on the three distros mentioned above?
Which ones are the most interesting, and for what reasons?

Personally, I’m mostly interested in NixOS & blendOS, as I believe they may have more advantages compared to Arch;

What do you think?

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh no. The rebrand is not done. There is no Atomic site yet, Atomic= Fedora Desktop with OSTree (Silverblue, Kinoite, Sericea, …)

    If you like GNOME, yes I recommend Silverblue a lot.

    Fedora has a very different system of the core distro. But with defaults I mean that they dont have apx by default but the same underneath.

    You could use a bash function for DNF for example, but in general it is

    distrobox-create Fedora39
    distrobox enter Fedora39
    sudo dnf install PACKAGE
    distrobox-export --app PACKAGE
    

    for GUI packages