Hello, i am currently looking for a Linux distribution with these criteria:

-it should be more or less stable, comparable to Ubuntu with or without LTS // -it should not be related to IBM to any way (so no fedora/redhat) // -it should not feature snaps (no Ubuntu or KDE neon) // -KDE plasma should be installable manually (best case even installed by default) // -no DIY Distros //

I’ve been thinking about using an immutable distro, but if anyone can recommend something to me, I’d be very grateful //

Edit: I’m sorry for the bad formatting, for some reason it doesn’t register spaces

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’ve been running Linux Mint Cinnamon for years. It’s the stablest, most dependable distro I’ve ever run. I’ve installed it, updated it and major-version-upgraded it many times on many machines and it never broke.

    It’s basically Ubuntu with the features that make Ubuntu shite removed (basically Unity and snaps) and a no-nonsense, GTK-based Win95-like desktop environment tacked on.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Mint with KDE? this makes no sense. This would be Ubuntu, maybe with Kubuntu Backports. You should be able to remove ubuntu-specific stuff like snaps easily.

  • Para_lyzed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Just to clarity the relationship between Red Hat, IBM, and Fedora, Fedora is only sponsored by Red Hat. They make all their own decisions, and while they receive financial support from Red Hat and Red Hat owns the Fedora trademark, their decisions and development are independent of Red Hat (and by extension IBM), with the single exception that they cannot risk violating the law (i.e. copyright infringement), else it risks Red Hat legal trouble (and Fedora would risk losing their sponsorship as a result). Red Hat benefits from Fedora’s development by the community, given that Fedora is RHEL’s upstream, hence why it continues to sponsor Fedora. But it isn’t Red Hat that is in charge of Fedora’s development, it’s FESCo, which is entirely community elected, and does not stand for the interests of Red Hat, but rather for the interests of the community.

    Eliminating Fedora from contention in that regard is essentially like eliminating Debian because you don’t like Canonical, who makes Ubuntu, a downstream of Debian.

    Add on top of that the fact that IBM and Red Hat are major contributors to the Linux kernel, and you absolutely cannot avoid connections to them while using Linux. I mean, that’s quite frankly a ridiculous exclusion criteria in the context of Linux. If you’re looking to avoid an operating system OWNED by Red Hat or IBM, then Fedora should not be included in that list. Neither of them have any say or pull in the development of Fedora, which is a completely community-driven project (no, owning the trademark doesn’t change that fact; if Red Hat tried to take over, the Fedora community would simply fork the project, rebrand, and continue on their own). Besides, Red Hat has no interest in controlling Fedora, because it doesn’t benefit them. Their only interest is in enterprise applications, which is not a good use case for Fedora. The only operating systems Red Hat actually has any control over are RHEL, CentOS, and any derivatives of those operating systems like Rocky Linux, Oracle Linux, and such (though Red Hat’s control over derivatives was only the result of those projects being downstream, not actual ownership).

    So with that in mind, I’d recommend the Fedora KDE spin if you want a normal, stable, snap-free, no DIY required distro with KDE, or if you want the immutable version, Fedora Kinoite is what you’d be looking for. And Fedora has the major advantage over Debian-based distros of actually receiving package and kernel updates regularly, so you can stay up to date and enjoy new features, all while maintaining stability.

    Fedora Kinoite is absolutely the best immutable distro fitting your criteria. Anything else will have a much smaller community and less support as a result. rpm-ostree has great documentation, and all of the Fedora Atomic Spins have a huge userbase available in case you ever have questions.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Second that.

      No matter if atomic or regular, Fedora has a good automatically preset rollback mechanism for when an update breaks something.

      They also have good Wayland support, awesome new packages, BTRFS and more.

  • Johanno@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Of course debian.

    However pure debian needs some love before you can use it.

    If you want to use steam. Enable 32 bit arch.

    If you want to use flatpak. You need to install it and add the default repo.

    To install kde plasma you need only a single apt command.

    I personally run debian-testing/Trixie.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I dont get Debian. It is so manual, everything needs to be done manually. They default to ext4 which is old as balls, their updates are not automatic (and apt-automatic is painfully complicated to configure) even though on a stable distro you can easily differentiate between security and feature updates.

      Everything that might be nicely preconfigured on Opensuse or Fedora is manual on Debian.

      And… you get years old packages, without any of the fixes the developers added in the past.

      As a semi-rolling Distro Opensuse Slowroll sounds nice. I think it already works, you change repos in Tumbleweed and thats it.

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The testing branch is at most 3 weeks old. I get new software, not the newest. Kde plasma has a auto update function that works on bootup. (though I usually go into sleep mode and therefore update often by hand.)

        Yes debian is pretty plain and empty but once configured it works. Sure I would recommend Mint to people who don’t like to configure. However the Mint(debian) version is lacking a lot and there is no testing branch you can safely run of.

            • Shareni@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              MX is preconfigured Debian with extra tools to help manage the system.

              We’re living in the age of flatpak and nix. There are plenty of options to install fresh and bleeding edge packages, while still having your system boot every time.

              • Pantherina@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I loved LSD conky lol.

                Never could get that to work and now on Wayland the whole concept would need to be rewritten to be a part of the desktop containmenr.

                • Shareni@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I’m guessing you replied to the wrong person.

                  Can’t you make the same thing in eww and have it work on Wayland?

  • sibachian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Linux Mint is hands down the most stable linux distro out there and has been for years. zero tinkering needed. everything just runs no questions asked.

    My only grief with Mint is the most recent update where they changed the software centee and now it’s slowed to a crawl. Why they would do this is anyones guess.

    I’m recommending MX until such time that Mint sort their crap out - unfortunately I doubt they will, seeing as this change of software center was to resolve some other issues they (but not is end users) though they had.

    MX is basically debian but with a lot of improvements. Sure it might have a bit of a learning curve for those primarily used to Ubuntu based systems, but it beats running any of the other Ubuntu distros by miles since they all struggle with the crap Ubuntu puts on top of Debian.

    Manjaro is another great option if you don’t want to deal with debian based stuff, and KDE is the default DE with most stuff under reasonable control. You can also use all the Arch resources if you ever run into trouble so it’s a lot less of a headache than what I’ve experienced running OpenSUSE (i want to love OpenSUSE but I just can’t).

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Linux mint is just Ubuntu with opinionated Ubuntu crap removed. Is there Linux Mint with KDE?

  • cerement@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago
    • yet another vote for Debian
    • or if you’re going immutable (“atomic” is a better name) then wait for Vanilla OS’s Orchid to be released (currently in Beta) – a little more user-friendly than NixOS (although that will depend on the documentation)
    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      VanillaOS is unstable as hell. Also their atomic model is not image-based but uses a regular package manager underneath. This makes it way less controlled, transparent and resettable than Fedoras model.

      I think Opensuses is similar, they also dont use images I think.

    • Luffy879@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      With diy distro I meant arch, gentoo, and nixOS The distro is meant to run on a PC which is mainly used by non tech sawwy people. And even tho I will be doing all administration tasks on it, I would like it to be as easy to manage themselves as possible, so they become familiar with Linux more.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Could you elaborate? Children, family members?

        I would recommend Fedora Kinoite from ublue for anything you dont manage yourself. Even if it breaks and your damn kernel doesnt boot, you can just reboot, choose the old version and have a working system.

        All changes can be reverted using rpm-ostree reset and updates on ublue versions are done in the background.

        Ublue takes the Fedora base and adds packages they cant, like restricted video codecs or drivers. Give it a try, I broke every other distro before and dont want to use something else anymore

      • INeedMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        My mom and grandma are using Manjaro. With grandma I’m the only one doing the updates of course, but with mom she usually can do it herself just using pamac-tray. If that fails a phonecall is usually sufficient. Once in a few years I have to come and do something by myself

        And when that happens I work with a distro that just works, instead of some broken crap
        EDIT: I tried having Mint on their computers. Big mistake, it’s as broken as Debian and Ubuntu

        EDIT: Xfce is very nice in such cases. It looks familiar for them while being manageable for me

  • Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    what does half stable mean?
    stable os with fresh applications?

    if thats what you are looking for,
    maybe debian with flatpacks for fresher softwares?

    or if you also dont like flatpack, maybe
    debian with nix

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Can you please like write the points in a list and not with these weird // in between? Lemmy uses markdown

    - this (that space between line and text is important)
    - is 
    - a list
    
    * this
    * too
    * forwhateverreason
    
    

    ``` before and after something : codeblock

    *italic*

    **bold**

    ***both***

  • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    There are only 3 options I can immediately think of, for you:

    Debian

    OpenSUSE (Leap)

    Slackware

    They are ordered from most to least likely to recommend for your criteria i.e I recommend Debian, alternatively Leap, and if you don’t like either you can try Slackware, but Slackware is closer to a DIY distro.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Opensuse Slowroll is a way better approach than Leap. Same for Debian, I would use Kubuntu and desnap it or something, as updates every 2 years is simply outdated quickly.

      KDE doesnt work well with “stable” Distros.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Slowroll. You change to it from Tumbleweed and its not completely finished but should already just work.

        • Pantherina@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Is is as testing as Fedora Rawhide? I just cant imagine it can be that stable, because Rawhide is a mess. But maybe they do way better testing.

          • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t really know how stable Fedora Rawhide is, because I only used it once. But OpenSuse does a whole lot of testing before shipping any update. From their website:

            Why should you consider openSUSE Tumbleweed over other distributions? The answer lies in its rigorous testing and stability emphasis. OpenSUSE is the base for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, meaning it’s secure, stable, and provides most of the software and tools you may need. While some rolling release distributions may offer the latest software packages, openSUSE Tumbleweed couples this with a strong emphasis on ensuring these updates won’t destabilize your system. Every Tumbleweed snapshot undergoes rigorous automated testing via openQA, openSUSE’s comprehensive testing tool, before its release. This process prevents critical bugs from reaching your system, providing an unexpected level of stability for a rolling release.

            • Pantherina@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Hm, this should be the case for rawhide too. But tbh rawhide has other problems like rpmfusion not being updated so there is no openh264 and stuff like that.

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Debian as others are saying is a great choice

    But I’ll still shill arch, I’ve literally never encountered a problem with it other than my first time installing manually being a learning experience. Not sure if it counts as a DIY distro bc you can definitely install with a script

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you use arch, you should do the “automatic snapshots” thing with BTRFS, grub and pacman hooks. That is important to have a version to rollback to, as its Arch.

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Definitely Debian. Or Mint if you also like the cinnamon desktop (which is similar to KDE’s in terms of default look).

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Cinnamon has no real Wayland support, along with all the fancy stuff like perfect fractional scaling, multi refresh rates, HDR support, and whatnot. At least Wayland support is important

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They didn’t specify that requirement. For instance, I have zero need for any of that and therefore can keep on trucking on Xorg until Wayland reaches my DE of choice in a stable form.

        • Pantherina@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I imagine installing KDE on Mint is not a good experience. You would need to remove the entire desktop, all the iconsets etc. and then install KDE.

          Lets see which X.org desktop wins the race for 3rd place with real Wayland support! I sure hope for the best.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I have yet to find an actual description of said difficulties. I’ve used Debian based distros for over 20 years, with a recent hiatus of some 3 years recently when I simply stopped using PCs at home. A different DE was always just an apt-get away, then select which of the N installed DEs you wanted to try at the login screen.

            • Pantherina@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago
              • setup autoupdates
              • setup virt-manager
              • install flatpak apps

              This is for sure different on GNOME than on KDE, my reference is GNOME and its horrible packagenames make debloating a pain.

  • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I would recommend Fedora Kinoite.
    Yes, you said no RedHat stuff, but Fedora is 100% community run.

    Especially when you use the Kinoite-build from universal-blue.org, everything should work ootb and is very reliable, while also being semi-stable in terms of update frequency