• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a fucking joke. It’s amazing how all these countries set weak goals for themselves and then fail anyway.

    We’re all going to die lol

    • Sodis@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The goal is complete decarbonization until 2045 and a lot of sectors in Germany are already on track with that goal, energy being one of them. That with a minister of finance, that does not want to spend money and a minister of transportation, that is more a puppet of the automobile industry and does not care about decarbonization. Imagine the US without the huge subsidies into clean energy. That’s what Germany is trying to do under their current minister of finance.

    • Samsy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but the goals in germany are written into a law, and the highest council actually blaming the government for failed goals.

      • quatschkopf34@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still not gonna change a damn thing. The (federal) government(s) don’t care, they are busy framing harmless protesters as potential terrorists and jailing them accordingly. Or they simply change the law again so that they do not have to be held accountable for their missed goals (see the ministry for transport).

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The UK likes to go the other way by talking up a ridiculous goal and then immediately failing it, like "Our goal is to produce zero CO2 and become the global leader in renewables by 2025” and then immediately open a new coal mine.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      German here.

      Even back under Merkel, elected parties had a habit of defining good goals and then rendering them impossible to hit through policy. This meant that no one could fault them for trying, and no one could fault them for not being able to hit them.

      Nowadays my countrymen aren’t as stupid anymore. That doesn’t mean we can do anything about it, but especially since Merkel we don’t believe any of these leaks anymore.

  • friendlymessage@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No matter the platform worldnews comments contain mainly ignorant, overconfident bullshit. Glad to know that there are some things in life one can depend upon.

  • Recant@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder if they would ever reconsider what they did for the deactivation of nuclear power plants.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if any of the nuclear bros on here ever consider, that jerking a fuel rod isn’t always the best approach?

      Seriously, every fucking time this comes up and every fucking time you guys show nothing but arrogance and ignorance, both usually weapons grade.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not german but I’m in the same continent and in a country that nobody really cares about and we are nearing the threshold where renewables produce more than we require to run the country.

    Funny thing is, private citizens are doing more for that effort alone than government in real terms because saving money is high on the priorities list here and free, renewable energy is a good thing, even more if you can produce it yourself.

    Meanwhile, we’ve been fighting the government to cancel the authorization to log nearly 2000 old growth cork oaks for installing a solar panel farm when we have a lot of room to plant off shore wind farms.

    Nobody really understands what is going on.

    • notapantsday@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      cork oaks

      Portugal! What a wonderful country full of wonderful people. We do care about you and your delicious but slightly greasy food.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’ve been eating at the wrong places… that’s a spanish thing: too much olive oil on every dish and too much fat on every cured meat

        • notapantsday@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just remember a sandwich covered in melted cheese with an egg on top and some kind of sauce. And a lot of delicious fried food. Both usually with fries as a side dish. Never any salad unless I specifically ordered it. I’m sure I could have gone to lots of restaurants where they would have had lighter meals, but I was on holiday so greasy was perfect.

        • agarorn@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh nice. Yeah, Portugal runs under the radar here. I found rhis https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/portugal

          Seems like you got rid of coal already. Oil/gas seem to hover however. Do you have plans about getting rid of fuel cars? And what do you use gas for? In Germany it’s mostly heating, I would have guessed you don’t need so much heating in Portugal and can use the AC in winter.

          And good look with these oaks, I hate forest being cut down.

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is the German plan:

    1. Shutdown the nuclear plants
    2. Burn more lignite
    3. WFH

    The council said assumptions made by the transport ministry on the effectiveness of the planned and already implemented measures, such as a discounted national rail ticket, a CO2 surcharge on truck tolls and increased working from home, were also optimistic. “Private vehicle individual transport is not addressed, so to speak. And that is ultimately a gap in the transport programme,” Brigitte Knopf, deputy chairwoman of the council, told a news conference presenting the report findings on Tuesday

    The plan for transportation emissions, 2/3 of the target to be cut, is WFH. Yikes!

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How about you guys stop this bullshit about the nuclear plants stuff? They were scheduled to be shut down for a VERY long time, the biggest mistake was selling out nearly all the renewable energy manufacturing to China. Nuclear power is only making a profit, if it’s subsidized like crazy.

      Not only that - A LOT of Germans are actively against putting up more wind power, let alone photovoltaics. Which is what over 50% voted “against” as well. Those that didn’t go voting, have lost all say in it, so yeah. That’s not a political issue, we Germans are the issue.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So why not modernize or replace the nuclear plants? Battery storage isn’t anywhere close to being able to store baseline energy for a full renewable grid.

        I agree it’s a perception issue, but that doesn’t mean nothing can be done about it.

        • Muetzenman@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Most plants are to old to modernize and building new ones is expensive, takes decates and dosn’t solve the dependency on uran and the nuclear waste problem. Renewables were always the longtearm goal and gas for shortages. Nuclear cant be easy switched on or off, so they aren’t a good solution to help with energy lows.

    • cedeho@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If all the subsidiaries that went into nuclear power the last few decades went to renewables instead Germany would have no issues at all, but hey… giving tax payer money to some very few giant energy companies is more important than creating a Europe leading renewables energy sector that does not rely on russian fossils or nuclear material.

      You should know that nuclear power is very expensive while renewables are absurd crazy cheap. I’ve been to a German Endlager and it takes years and BILLIONS of Euros just to seal this thing off. Guess who is paying? Mostly tax payers.

      There’s be no company in Germany which would be willing to run a nuclear power plant if they were responsible for the permanent disposal of their waste on their own instead of letting the tax payer pay (most of) for it.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s all well and good in the energy sector. What about transportation? If I understand correctly, transportation makes up the majority of the emissions Germany aims to cut

        • Zacryon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sadly, we have a long history of incompetent transport ministers. That didn’t change with the last elections.

    • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only there was some means of replacing all that coal with a non-carbon intensive source of energy that isn’t dependant on the weather…

      Has anyone heard of such a technology?


      Sarcasm aside, that Germany shut down their last two nuclear reactors so recently and carried through is astounding. The excuses are mind-boggling. They’re old? Refurbishing is cheaper and faster than new built. They need re-certification? Then do it.

      • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s more efficient to use the money required for

        1. The inspection
        2. The renovations
        3. Acquiring new fuel

        And spend it on renewables than to do the above.

        Also a big factor noone seems to care about: staff. The people who worked there have other jobs now. You can’t just plop a reactor plant somewhere and expect it to make electricity you need highly specialised staff for that. We also did not invest into training new staff because why would we, with the stop for nuclear power being decided 10 years ago.

        • dot20@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The renewables generate electricity mostly when there is sun/wind, so there is an oversupply at those times and a need to burn natural gas at other times.

          The nuclear plants would generate electricity 24/7 with little waste.

          Either way, now they are investing the money in digging up lignite, so it’s worse than either renewables or nuclear.

          • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Either way, now they are investing the money in digging up lignite, so it’s worse than either renewables or nuclear.

            Where do you get that from?

            The renewables generate electricity mostly when there is sun/wind, so there is an oversupply at those times and a need to burn natural gas at other times.

            The nuclear plants would generate electricity 24/7 with little waste.

            Yes congrats, we will need to build energy storages. Thats nothing new. Also calling the waste of nuclear plant little might be factually true if you only go by volume. If you go by “amount of pain in the ass to deal with” calling it little would be a very big understatement.

            • dot20@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where do you get that from?

              Duitsland zet vol in op kolen, maar vooral transport blijkt knelpunt - https://nos.nl/l/2438762

              Germany to reactivate coal power plants as Russia curbs gas flow - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/08/germany-reactivate-coal-power-plants-russia-curbs-gas-flow

              The eviction of Lützerath: the village being destroyed for a coalmine – a photo essay - https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/jan/24/eviction-lutzerath-village-destroyed-coalmine-a-photo-essay

              Yes congrats, we will need to build energy storages. Thats nothing new.

              Ok, so where are the energy storages currently being built? This is not exactly a problem that’s cheap or trivial to solve.

              • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Can’t comment on the first one.

                The guardian article says that Germany reactivated coal plants to act as an emergency if the gas would not be enough. It’s important to known that gas is not primarly used to make electricity, gas plants are only used when there are peaks in consumption that can not be fulfilled by any other means. Reactivating plants as an emergency backup is not the same as investing in coal power. I am not clear on whether they were even necessary, afaik the gas reserves never went into a critically low level.

                Lüzerath is a whole other story. That deal had been made long ago, RWE agreed to stop mining coal earlier if they were allowed to mine the area with that village on top of it. It became a symbol, and people claimed the coal was necessary to maintain stability in the electricity network. Which was proven wrong it was mostly sold to other countries to be burned in their plants.

                For all our faults Germany is steadily leaving both fossile and nuclear power behind.

                Ok, so where are the energy storages currently being built? This is not exactly a problem that’s cheap or trivial to solve.

                You mean just like nuclear plants are very expensive and non-trivial to build?

    • Sodis@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Grimpen@lemmy.ca You are misinformed there. The energy sector reaches its goal and offshore wind farms and solar panels are actually over-performing, meaning more are built than was planned for this year. The sectors largely missing their goals are the transport and the building sector.