How did it go? Any recommendations?

  • Extrawurst@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Avatar Rising. Fun game, more difficult than I’d thought (we were three players). And they really nailed the heroes/villains abilities for the lore of the game

  • dschibster@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I explored Shadowrun: Crossfire together with a few friends last week. I got it pretty cheaply on a yard sale and thought I it would be fun to try out.

    After our first round, we went our separate ways and played a second round with the content from High Caliber Ops on Tabletop Simulator, which was also very fun. The second round basically just flew by and we were able to secure victories in both. I’ll probably try out a new role in the next one!

  • tetha@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mh, we had a round of boardgames with friends two sundays into the past. I’ll chalk that up to rounding errors.

    The session started with Flashpoint: Fire Rescue. It’s a pretty simple and straightforward opening game about a burning house and rescuing a bunch of people from there, which is why it’s one of our openers. If you know action-point based games, you know half of the rules already.

    You spend 4-ish action points on running around, dousing flames, carrying or healing people and such. Afterwards you roll dice to select a field on the board to escalate the fire. Usually, you place smoke on empty squares (and in our case, the toilet was on fire so damn much…), but if you roll a square with smoke, that field and all connected smoke fields turn to fire. If you roll fire, that field explodes and damages walls, doors, spreads more fire in the cardinal directions. If you roll a specially marked field - a fire hotspot - you roll again.

    We played on a medium difficulty setting because we had a new player and won that round, but everyone agreed that it was teetering on a knifes edge at 1-2 situations in the game - how it should be. Next time, heroics will be up :)

    And afterwards, we tackled our current raid boss, Dune: Empire. This was our third or fourth session, and we found another 2-3 rules we had been doing wrong - one or two of these mistakes being a rather huge one nerfing cards like the Bene Gesserit very hard.

    But as a game loop: You have rather normal deck building ideas. You draw 5 cards from a private deck and play one of those cards to send an agent to places - like cities on Arrakis, places at the guilds and the Landsrat, which gives you resources like money, water and spice, loyality with the guild and optionally armies. However - and this was the mistake we made - this card stays in play until cleanup. This repeats until all players have used their 2-3 agents, at which point you play your entire hand to get the final turn bonuses on them, money practically. This allows you to buy cards from the market, improving your deck a bit. Afterwards, the current combat strengths are evaluated based off or garrisoned or active armies, as well as some instant-cast spellcards to ad some spice to the fight and the winners get rewards according to the current conflict. At the end of the game, victory points decide the winner.

    It’s very much a bigger game and you can expect to invest 3-4 rounds into the game to understand all the rules, to get familiar with the cards and the pace of the game and to get some understanding of some meta of the game.

    Like, I approached my first run with a dominion mindset. Get some trashing, get some value, thin the deck and win.The issue is - you only have 6-8 shuffles available based off of the pace of the game. This makes the usual trashing setup too slow usually. Most trashers also have conditions on them like “Have another Bene Gesserit Card in Play”, and if you discard your cards in play too early, that also becomes harder.

    But it’s a very fun game once you get into it and it’s going to be the main staple for the near future of your boardgame rounds.

    • Kempeth@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like the deckbuilding in Dune: Empires more than in Ruins of Arnak. You still don’t get a whole lot of deck cycling and optimization but you do get some. Arnak has only - what - 5 turns?

      • dpunked@feddit.deOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am also not too much of a fan of Arnak, I found it to be kinda lackluster and a whole lot lf minmaxing from turn one. I prefer to go with the flow, adjust strategy and so forth. With Arnak I never felt fun, it felt like a job

  • mofeien@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m currently in the honeymoon phase with Innovation, a small but wild and cut-throat, kind of abstract civilization style card game originally released in 2010. I played it twice with my girlfriend now and she won both times, but losing is also fun here, simply because so much chaotic stuff will happen. It seems that so many different strategies are possible that no two games will feel similar.

    I heard that some people dislike it for the chaos it contains, but I hope I can get some people from my usual gaming group interested so that I can play more often.

    There will also soon be a Kickstarter for an updated version which I am excited for.

  • AwkwardTurtle@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I played Earth for the second time Sunday night (after my usual RPG night was cancelled/postponed), this time with 4 rather than my first game with 2.

    It’s a really interesting game, but I’m not entirely sure how I feel about it yet. I originally took a look because it kept coming up in discussions around Ark Nova (which I tried and disliked), Wingspan, Terraforming Mars, etc.

    I can see why people say Ark Nova is a bad comparison (I agree, very little overlap) but absolutely see why people compare it to Wingspan so often. So many of the mechanics in Earth seem to be directly pulled from Wingspan and then vaguely re-themed to be plant based. It really feels like they started with Wingspan as a base design, and then reworked it into their own concept.

    Pros:

    • Simultaneous/shared turns a la Race for the Galaxy work super well in a wingspan-like game. Getting to run your engine on other people’s turns is so much nicer than sitting and waiting for them to deliberate over choices.
    • The flexibility of getting to build your own tableau with almost no limitations is a lot of fun, as opposed to building off of an existing engine framework.
    • The shared turns have made it (so far) such that I never felt like I was truly pinched for resources. I wasn’t taking actions out of desperation to catch up, I was picking what I felt would get me closer to my actual goals.
    • Despite the singleton deck, it never felt like I was unable to find cards with the synergies or qualities I needed.
    • There were a good number of high payoff “build around” cards that came up, which is something I always enjoy in a board game.

    Cons:

    • The iconography could use some work, especially considering how heavily the game relies on it. I mean, the “cold climate” symbol is a five pointed snowflake?! The object that is famously six sided?! I understand having a learning curve, but having a player ask, “what the hell does this symbol mean?” and hour into a game isn’t great.
    • Flavor is tenuous, in Wingspan I get that predators hunt smaller birds, that birds which lay lots of eggs and store lots of eggs, etc. In Earth, I have no idea why a given plant has 5 sprouts but only 2 growth, or another one has 2 sprouts and 4 growth. The event cards are even more incomprehensible.
    • It’s got a bit of the “egg rush” end game from Wingspan (sprout rush here) but it’s mitigated by shared actions, and having more flexibility in how you build things up (this could have also been placed in Pros, tbh).
    • I would never ever want to play this in person. So many fiddly bits interacting that I’m happy to allow BGA to handle for me. Especially considering the scoring, which (again) mirrors Wingspan but has significantly higher totals and would presumably take proportionally longer to count up.
    • I understand why a game like this uses photos as card art, but I do really wish they had nice Wingspan-like illustrations instead.

    Overall, very interesting game. I had fun, and I’m looking forwarding to digging into it more on future plays.

    • Kempeth@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with all your pros. Turning Wingspan into a truly parallel game was a brilliant decision. The bird feeder and shared display were never a strong component of WS and greatly slowed everything down. While it’s definitely possible to strand yourself for a turn or two in Earth if you expend all resources of a certain type and then have no one pick the corresponding action, that IS on you and you can recover from it. I also like that almost all scoring cards are impactful and you’re always spoiled for choice.

      For me the nice pictures were a major pull. I probably would not have backed it without them…

  • dpunked@feddit.deOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    We played a match of Clank: Catacombs with 3 players.

    One player was new to Catacombs itself but knew the normal Clank. The dungeon layout this time turned out a bit more tricky and there were few easy escape routes. The new player panicked a bit and decided to grab the lowest value artefact and run for it. He only made it out with 60 points. Final score was 121, 111, 60.

    I really like how each game feels much more different with Catacombs, the layout of the dungeon being discovered throughout the game creates a lot of tension. If you love Clank but know the map inside out by now, Catacombs is the answer.

    Whenever showing someone Clank, I usually first play a game of Dominion to show Deckbuilding, then we play a game of normal Clank. The next time they come, Catacombs is on the table.

    • Kempeth@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s good to hear that they addressed the repetitiveness of Clank. While I like the game formula I simply lost interest in playing it again after 2 or 3 games.

      • dpunked@feddit.deOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I played a ton of normal Clank and found it enjoyable each time, I just love building decks :) But I find the varied dungeon really refreshing

        • donio@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am still on the fence about Catacombs. The concept sounds neat but I think there is also something to be said about planning out your possible routes in the originals. And the art of the full board seems a lot thematic and cohesive.

          Does the Catacombs deck bring much new on the card and deckbuilding side?

          I love everything Clank though so I think I will have to get it sooner or later, I’m just stalling :)

          • dpunked@feddit.deOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know what you mean but I really like the diversity of the map. It feels a lot more like exploring and dungeon crawling.

            I find the cards in the dungeon row very interesting, some very cool cards in there. Overall you will make a lot of clank going around. Many cards add it and many monsters also add it. But there are plenty of options to heal and mitigate.

            The lockpicks instead of keys are a cool little thing because paths opened with a lockpick stay open for everyone. Earning gold is also possible through multiple different ways. I really prefer it over the base game. You can also combine the adventure party addon to catacombs to play with 6. Its has extra rules in the rulebook for that

  • elvith@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I went to a board game trade fair (“Spiel doch! Am Bodensee”). I had my kids with me, so I did mostly play family and kids games with them, but also found cough some cough games for me. But now I’m broke LOL.

    Anyway, I welcome Hens (“Hennen”), Factory 42 (german edition; signed by the designer), Dune:Imperium and Everdell to my collection. I also got bear and puma tokens for Cryptid, as missing an areal and needing to correct a yes/no was always a strong hint to someone’s rule and has ruined a game already a few times.

    My kids also got some new games, but the only one of them, that I liked personally was Café del Gatto

    • Kempeth@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Damn. That was this weekend? We thought about going as well but lost sight of it.

      • elvith@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, the weekend before: 02.06.23 - 04.06.23

        It was really nice. Some huge games in the entrance hall (e.g. Carcassonne with ~25x25cm tiles) and an exhibition Halle filled about 2/3 with booths of game shops, game designers and game publishers and about 1/3 of the hall full of tables with chairs and a huge booth where you could lend games for free to try them out. See also their flyer:

        https://www.nostheide.de/downloads/Messemagazin_FN_2023.pdf

  • Kempeth@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Was just about to post this myself ;-)

    GF and I played a round of Lost Cities, one of our go to games. It’s always fascinating to see how each game develops and agonizing to decide which colors to throw away and which ones to commit to. This was a hugely close game 199 vs 224. The last round we basically didn’t compete in ANY color. Each of us just kept drawing almost all cards of our respective color. She a bit more than me but what I lacked in value cards I made up in multipliers and managed to eek out a single point more than her.

    At the weekly board gaming session my group played the last chapter of Aeon’s End Legacy 2 (second attempt). I wasn’t present for their first attempt and they really hyped up that last battle. But we got into it with a nice combo of characters. Despite some painful early losses of expensive cards our main damage dealers were able to power up while I and another geared up for support. At the midpoint it looked pretty bleak for a moment but a turn of 28 damage later things had cleared up very well. At that point I was pretty confident we would be able to exhaust the nemesis draw pile which we were. We didn’t expect that we would also have to whittle down the nemesis to zero but it turned out to not be much of an issue.

    Then on Wednesday my GF’s brother came over for pizza and board games and we played Minecraft: Builders and Biomes. Just like last time I had the worst luck in my attempts to fight monsters. Must have wasted something around 10 actions drawing basically just potatoes. As such, while my building was pretty efficient my GF managed to sneak past me to victory. Her brother came in third (he really focused on collecting blocks hoping they would we worth something at the end - despite my assurances they would not shrug) but really liked the game and requested we bring it over when we visit the next time.

  • Raikin@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    After half a year, I finally continued my King’s Dilemma game with friends. We had a huge blast again, it’s definitely one of my favorite boardgames at this point and I’m very excited for the sequel.

    Also, this is my first post in the fediverse, so hello! So nice to find a kinda active tabletop community here!

    • samyobanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the minimum number of players you need for this game? I want to get it and it looks fun but I’m worried that my consistent group is just too small.

      • Raikin@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hm, I think the more the merrier. We’re currently running it with 4 players, and I personally wouldn’t want to play with less than that.

  • voodoocode@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Terraforming Mars Ares Expedition - nice Variation to the original, better for 2.

    Imperium:Legends - interesting and deep civilisation deck builder. We have both this and Classics, which means tons of civs for lot of replayability

  • swnt@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kodama!

    A cute Japanese tree-spirit creatures inspired board game about growing a tree and earning leaf points over three seasons. Whoever gets the most points wins! Takes around 30 minutes to play.

  • Foon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tried Gigawatt for the first time this weekend with friends. It’s a game about countries in Europe trying to transform their energy production into green energy while simultaneously meeting the growing energy demands, balancing the power net, and making sure you don’t go broke. At first glance it seemed a lot simpler than the games I usually enjoy, but it surprised me with interesting strategic choices and a pretty good balance. And the theme is very well executed and (to my knowledge) quite accurate to the real world. Would recommend.

    Also played a few games of Frosthaven, we just entered the third year in the campaign. Playing Shackles and Astral. Really loving the experience so far.

    Lastly had a few rounds of The Crew, it’s such a good little game for almost any occasion and group!

  • MrNatewood@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I played Santiago for the first time in a couple of years and it was so much fun. Excellent interaction mechanisms.

    • dpunked@feddit.deOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh cool, I never played it but from all the old “euro” games that I played, I think they were much heavier on their player interactions than most modern ones