Appimages totally suck, because many developers think they were a real packaging format and support them exclusively.

Their use case is tiny, and in 99% of cases Flatpak is just better.

I could not find a single post or article about all the problems they have, so I wrote this.

This is not about shaming open source contributors. But Appimages are obviously broken, pretty badly maintained, while organizations/companies like Balena, Nextcloud etc. don’t seem to get that.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I agree with this, but as an app developer, can I just say, Flathub’s documentation is an absolute abomination. It is so bad, that I’ve tried 3 times to publish an app and have given up each time. I can build a local Flatpak just fine, but getting it on Flathub is just so convoluted and bad.

    AppImages are ridiculously easy to build and distribute, just a pain to actually use. And even then, they’re not that much of a pain.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If worst comes to worst you can just distribute your .flatpak file directly, as you would with your app image

      • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        This would tick a lot of issues but please dont do that. People will get used to it and suddenly malware is possible again.