Finally migrated from Windows to Linux. For anyone wondering, what is the state of Linux as your primary OS for home PC\laptop in 2023.

I’ve finalised my Archlinux installation yesterday, I dropped of Linux more than 10 years ago and experience in 2023 in comparison is awesome and beyond even wildest dreams back then:

  • For average user looking for more out of the box experience I would suggest something Arch based (people in comments suggest EndeavourOS, please do your research). Archlinux installation took me quite some time
  • Almost everything works out of the box, by just installing corresponding package
  • KDE Plasma environment is fast and beautiful
  • Pipewire audio server (Jack\Pulseaudio replacement) works great
  • Wayland window server is not there yet, especially if you have Nvidia with proprietary drivers and want to use VR. Waking up, session restoration and other scenarios have issues. Use X11.
  • Wine is great!
  • Music making - Bitwig Studio DAW has linux native version, yabridge allow you to use windows VSTs, which are easily installed via wine
  • Gaming works out of the box with Steam for majority of titles, some games have native linux version. Performance is great. In worst case windows game might loose 5-15% in performance. Was not case for my titles
  • Gaming outside steam is fine too. Use Wine, Lutris, Proton
  • VR is a mixed bag. Not everything is there (Desktop view, sound control and mirroring, camera, motions smooth, lighthouses do not wake up os go to sleep. I use my phone to turn them on/off). But if its not the problem for you, quite some titles work. Tried: native HF Alyx, Lab, windows: Beat Saber and Boneworks. For me it’s a surprise, I did not count on it. Performance is great.

So overall my experience is great. Eventually I’m going to get rid of WIndows on other computers and laptops at howe. I can finally wave goodbye to Windows, with lots of ads and bloatware. Alway glad to help with answers regarding installation while my memory and history logs are fresh. ^^

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t recommend Arch to Linux beginners, though. It’ll take quite a bit of tinkering to get to work and you have to develop a pretty detailed understanding of the whole thing. Which is absolutely fine, of course, if this is what you want to do. But if you just want something that works with minimal hassle, try Mint.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a certain kind of beginner I would recommend Arch to, those rare folks who really do learn best from the bottom up. Candidates must also see “computers” as a hobby, and have separate hardware from their daily driver they’re installing/learning Linux on.

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. If you want to tinker and look under the hood, Arch is great. But if you just want stuff to work, there are better alternatives.

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait until you find out that your BIOS and Firmware are also proprietary! Gotta get rid of those, but Coreboot/Heads is a real rabbithole and needs lots of work to be usable.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    For average user looking for more out of the box experience I would suggest something Arch based (people in comments suggest EndeavourOS, please do your research). Archlinux installation took me quite some time

    A simple install of Debian + GNOME install (with all the defaults, easier to install than Windows) will provide you with a useful store that can even load flatpaks… and there’s nothing that easy an practical on the KDE land.

    Almost everything works out of the box, by just installing corresponding package

    ^No extra package required

    Wine is great!

    No it isn’t. It is a piece of shit that does a garbage of a job to get Windows application to “run”. It doesn’t run old/basic applications well nor does it run useful modern applications such as MS Office without constant glitches and hours of hacking around

    TL:DR; the Linux experience might be great but it isn’t for everyone and anyone. If you need to do your job and not constantly be dealing with small annoyances that will curb your productivity it isn’t, most likely, for you.

    • RaketenRonny500@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They hated him because he spoke the truth. I can’t even get “simple” distros like mint or popos to run on my work laptop because the keyboard will just not work on boot 19 out of 20 times and no amount of googling or chatgpt was able to fix this. It just won’t work.

      On my gaming rig with an Nvidia card there were no fan controls and no VRR on wayland and x11 doesn’t have proper multi monitor support. This sub is delusional, if they think that Linux is usable for the average Joe and I’m coming from an IT background and it’s still too much of a hassle for me. I just want to get things done.

  • pathief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does Archlinux take some time to set up but then is as easy to maintain as Manjaro or does the struggle never end?

    Always wanted to try out Arch but feel intimidated by all the people telling me not to :P

    • pchem@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my experience, once you’ve got Arch set up, it less work to maintain than Manjaro. On Arch, you have noticeably more frequent, but smaller, package updates. On Manjaro, compatibility issues with the AUR may occur, which happened a few times for me, while that won’t happen on Arch.