• Zacryon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are way too many people who are deeply convinced that Trump is sent from the christian God and will save the US-american people from evil.

        • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s the part that I’m actually worried about, Christians who are actively seeking to end the fucking world. They want political violence, civil unrest and war in the middle east. It’s so fucked.

          • Perry@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            They want political violence, civil unrest and war in the middle east.

            Correct me if I’m wrong, wasn’t Jesus born somewhere in West Asia?

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              depends on who you ask.

              there’s solid reason to doubt the biblical narrative, though. the simple answer is “we don’t know, precisely”.

              • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                There is more evidence to support the physical person of Gilgamesh (the epic of whom was stolen almost word for word to create the Torah) than that of a man called Jesus the Christ. Ie contemporary references, records, documents. Not written 30 -400 years after death.

                • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  There’s really no historical proof, outside biblical accounts.

                  But that doesn’t really mean there’s a need to dismiss it out of hand. There probably was a Jewish mystic faith healer named Jesus (or whatever,); who was executed by the Roman’s for stirring the shit.

                  There were in fact, a lot of them. (John the Baptist comes to mind,)

                  Further, his name (and his father’s,) were. Both extremely common. it’s reasonable to assume at least a few were in fact named Jesus, son of Joseph, and apparently from Nazareth.

                  Together it’s actually not that unlikely. Though he would have had more in common with the sleaziest televangelist faithhealer you can imagine. Joel Osteen, perhaps.

          • Omega_Man@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            Wouldn’t it be funny if they end up being right. They destroy the world. Jesus returns. All the left wing/libs go to hell and the conservatives/maga go to heaven. Like you get to intentionally fuck everything up and then enjoy eternal bliss while the people trying to improve the world burn in hell.

        • glitches_brew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Reminds me of a time I had dinner at a girl’s house and she insisted on only using Styrofoam plates because the faster we destroy the planet the faster Jesus will come back to save us. I was speechless.

          • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I have to believe she just didn’t want to wash any dishes and, like most Christians, was using religion as an excuse to be a bad person.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          the only people who are ‘okay with it’ are the overly-optimstic pre-tribs. The post-tribs believe they have to go through the suck too, so, there’s that.

          Yes. There’s a shit load of arguments about whether the rapture happens before, after, or during the tribulations. My favorite position is any-trib. mostly because… wtf?

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I, for one, will be voting Trump to hasten the apocalypse. Anything is better than this shit.

          Edit: Belated /s

          By “this shit” I mean everything stupid since 2016 that feels like it can’t possibly be real life and by “the apocalypse” I meant the actual literal coming of hell on Earth where Trump reveals himself as Damien (to no one’s surprise) and Satan appears with him condemning all these fake Christians-in-name-only

          • Captain_Buddha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            I, for one, hope that you step in something wet every time you’re walking around in socks. Anything is better that your comfort.

              • Veneroso@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Step on a cactus with needles you can’t see to remove.

                They burn for several days until your body pushes them out.

                And may you wash your socks, only to wear them next week, and suffer again.

          • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Fortunately whether you vote for the Toupee or the Toupee’s generic opposition, we’re doomed either way! One option does delay the doom for a maximum of four years though, so take that into account.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        contemporary readers would have understood every anti-christ reference to have meant somebody they’d know and hate.

        The antichrist of revelation was understood to be Nero, for example, where Daniel would have been talking about babylon. Remember: we’re not the target audience. The target audience was the original audience contemporary to the author. the eschatology of Revelation has already been seen to happen. The world didn’t end. the book is wrong. (Insert “it was all allegory anyway” here.)

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      And others who firmly believe he IS the Antichrist and want to get him in power to hasten the return of Christ.

      America is a lunatic asylum.