Ei taida olla iso asia tuo kadunmiesten tavoitettavuus. Ihmiset, jotka ammatikseen tuota tiedostusta tarvitsevat löytävät sen kyllä, ja kadunmieskin saa tietoa kunhan siellä on muutama toimittaja raportoimassa eteenpäin tärkeimmät.

Tämä kommentti meni nyt aika pahasti tämmöiseksi “nuo tuolla internetissä on ihan tyhmiä eikä uskoneet loistavaa argumenttiani” -tason marisemiseksi, mutta menköön.

Monesti olen halunnut kirjoittaa vastaavan jeremiaadin r/suomesta, mutta jättänyt tekemättä. Siellä nyt vaan on aika paljon aika töhöä sakkia, joka aina ymmärtää väärin tai ei ollenkaan. Never forget pakolaiskriisivuodet.

Redditiin kirjoittelu kokonaisuudessaan loppuikin osaltani silloin sen enshittifikaatiokesän aikana.

Such a weird rule, but can’t disagree with the supreme court.

I typically listen to these after taking my morning LSD, and do get some psychoactive effects. Strangely the effects are completely different if I take amphetamines or light up the afternoon crack pipe before listening.

Seriously tho, I just started to listen to this for the first time ever, and it does work as a pretty effective and non-intrusive noise blocker. Easy to ignore.

Edit: never mind the second point, the surroundings just got quieter at the same time I started to listen.

Man, I’m starting to suspect this Netanyahu guy is a real jerk.

I hope it will not be Florida of 2000 election all over again, but in a massive scale.

It’s insane, Gore won by several thousand votes, if not tens of thousands.

Yeah the sub attempt scoring could be easily abused by pulling closed guard and doing things like collar chokes, sloppy arm bar attempts, triangles etc. I suppose here the concept was so new that no blatant abuse was done yet.

The idea of promoting subs more is of course in the right direction, so it would be cool to see further rulesets towards this direction. Maybe less points, only award points for the first 3 attempts, require that the sub attempt lasts at least 10 seconds or something like that. Definitely not easy to get right.

In particular business logic that’s not obvious should be documented in comments.

// Typically 1 = 1, but on March accounting wants that 1 = 2. This function makes that mapping.

Just remember to mark all the things you’d like to make better but can’t be arsed to at the moment with numerous TODOs.

Hi colleague! So I found a comment in the code from 3 years ago by you saying you should “improve this”. Is it planned for the next sprint?

Few of the good ones I’ve spotted:

(complicated business logic in messy code) // TODO: check

(…) // TODO: think about better naming

(…) // TODO: This is obviously shit and needs to be changed.

(…) // TODO: THIS IS NOT USED ANYWHERE CONSIDER REMOVING ALTOGETHER (comment made 3 years ago)

Aamulla ennen kahveja luin otsikon ja ajattelin, että se on niin päin että liittoumassa joku takapajuinen Unkari halusi syrjiä vähemmistöjä ja Suomi jää protestina pois. Sitten kun sen jutun luki kokonaan, niin menikin takapajuisuussyytökset ihan toisin päin. Hupsistakeikkaa.

Ahaa, ymmärsin väärin että sivut oli vielä hakusessa, kun kysymys taitaa olla vain tästä shadowbannauksesta. Siitä en ikävä kyllä osaa sanoa mitään, mutta eipä omalla hakukokeilullakaan näyttänyt tulevan tuota sivustoa.

Onko varmaa, että sillä on nettisivut? Facebookissa ja Instagramissa näkyy olevan jotakin, yleensähän noihin on helpompi ja nopeampi pistää sivut kuin rakentaa nollasta omat.

Is some make believe hurting a fragile right-wing ego again? I’ll play some sad tunes on my violin, it’s pretty small tho, hope it’s all right.

(seriously tho, I hope you’re trolling)

I don’t think fusion would be as useful a technology as it would have been a few decades ago. Now renewables (wind, solar, hydro) seem like more and more as the clean and cheap energy of the future. The biggest problem of storage is rapidly being solved with batteries springing up everywhere.

The real problem with fusion is that even if it worked, the plants would be very complex and expensive. It would be much cheaper and reliable to build solar, wind and batteries instead.

Having operational fusion reactors would be cool as hell, but it wouldn’t have that much impact on our lives in the end.

The youngsters are downvoting you, but what you’re saying is sad but true. It’s the reason Bernie never ran as an independent, he knew it would hand the victory to republicans on a silver platter.

Pinaateista ja muista tumman vihreistä lehtikasveista saa tosiaan ihan ok salaatteja, mutta jos haluaa vähän parempia niin kannattaa pistää sinne joukkoon myös marjoja kuten vaikka mansikoita ja pieniä kuutioita jotain vahvaa juustoa.

Ei tarvitse tulla saattamaan, löydän kyllä tieni ulos itsekin.

I have to say I’m not terribly big fan of videos with a title that is opposite of the message. It feels cheap. “Don’t do X unless you want [long list of benefits of doing X]”. Why do we need this?

A few years ago many countries were marketing themselves with “Don’t go to [country name]”, and it was cringe already then.

Edit: I actually didn’t have any patience to watch the video initially, apart from skimming here and there, so I missed the fact that the speaker hasn’t seen the slides beforehand and it’s some kind of a joke presentation. Would have been nice to see it in the title or video description.

Don’t you even think about the billionaires, bro?