I used Plex for my home media for almost a year, then it stopped playing nice for reasons I gave up on diagnosing. While looking at alternatives, I found Jellyfin which is much more responsive, IMO, and the UI is much nicer as well.

It gets relegated to playing Fraggle Rock and Bluey on repeat for my kiddo these days, but I am absolutely in love with the software.

What are some other FOSS gems that are a better experience UX/UI-wise than their proprietary counterparts?

EDIT: Autocorrect turned something into “smaller” instead of what I meant it to be when I wrote this post, and I can’t remember what I meant for it to say so it got axed instead.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless something has changed recently, that’s not exactly true. They charge 99c for the distribution of it through the windows store (or whatever it’s called) but you can install them the traditional way no problem

        I think it’s still dumb but it’s a distinction worth making. I think the description even links the website where you can download it

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bitwarden password manager. I’ve used several proprietary PW managers, Bitwarden is by far the most stable, intuitive, and functional IMO.

    • portside@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also KeePass, I’ve switched from bitwarden to KeePassDX on mobile and set up syncing to nextcloud and google drive. Aegis for time based OTP’s.

    • drekly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is great and I do use it, and it was super easy to export from lastpass

      BUT the autofill is so unreliable in comparison, it’s annoying

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used Bitwarden a lot but it pissed me off that I couldn’t add new entries while offline, that accessing attachments requires me to be online as well, and that attachments are not part of the backup.

      I switched back to Enpass due to that, which has even a slightly better UX IMHO. It’s not FOSS though, but uses the FOSS sqlcipher library for storage. So if push comes to shove, I can still exfiltrate my data without relying on the vendor.

  • directive0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Blender. I feel pretty confident in saying that there is simply nothing like it in the commercial world. Its feature set is unreal; its like the swiss army knife of 3D modelling programs. I can’t say enough good things about Blender. It has replaced so many secondary programs in my workflow and is slowly dominating to become my entire workflow.

    It used to suck to use in the late 2010s and then work was done to overhaul its space-shuttle cockpit interface, and now it actually feels concise and usable. I freaking love blender now. Big time blender fanboy right here.

          • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Isn’t distance more suitable to describe an improvement than time? Don’t find anything wrong with that comment.

            “It is better by a mile” vs “It is better by three hours”

            • Zacryon@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Good point. I guess it depends on the interpretation. If you consider that developments take time, be it developments in software, technology, research or whatever, then saying something like “this software is years ahead of its time” sounds appropriate.

              That’s how I read the comment. Additionally, given that it’s a common misconception that a lightyear describes a timespan, I felt the urge to be a smartass.

              • aksdb@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                But you typically can’t influence time, while you can influence distance travelled. The faster car will get you further in the same time than a slower car. So IMO distance (travelled) is the better measurement.

                • Zacryon@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  To continue dissecting this, since I don’t have anything better to do right now:

                  What you do in that time depends. If you drive a faster car, sure, you’ll travel a further distance in less time than a slower car. If you use the same car however, the distance is as meaningful as the time for a symbol of progress. Since technological and scientific advancements in general don’t depend on people driving around in cars, but on people investing a lot of time and effort, I would prefer time as a measurement.

                  Usually, if we think about scientific, technological or cultural progress, we tend to judge based on time and not on distance. For example, consider some indigenous cultures which live their lifes isolated from the rest of the world. They are often compared to primitive “stoneage”-like cultures. We specifically use time as a measure.

                  However, I am not completely opposed to agreeing with you. I think it depends on what you want to emphasize. A distance can be useful for reflecting some aspects in which, e.g., a software, takes the lead compared to alternatives. Then again, time would be better suited to highlight very innovative features or significant futuristic advancements which may have groundbreaking qualities.

                  And if someone is already using “lightyears” as a measure, I think that’s already an amount of improvement which deserves a time-based phrasing.

                  Anyway, I see good points for both and I am no longer interested in this. Take it or leave it. I don’t care anymore.

    • cujo@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I adore OBS. I’ve been teaching my friends the basics on how to use it, as they’ve all been using some proprietary crap that makes their lives marginally easier in one or two areas but adds a huge headache in others.

        • cujo@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am by no means a master at OBS, and I wouldn’t know where to point you to learn. Everything I know I’ve learned by either poking around in the software or googling specific questions, i.e. “how to overlay twitch chat in OBS”. As you can probably guess, I used to use it to stream to twitch. Not very suddenly, mind, but I did it. Lol!

          OBS is designed for streaming out and recording video, not really for music production. I’m sure there are some FOSS music production softwares worth checking out, though!

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I personally run an older build of emby, the open source software jellyfin was forked from. It’s very similar, but I found emby’s video transcoding (or explicit not transcoding) to be more reliable

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Desktop: Zotero, RStudio, Thunderbird, Sumatra PDF, Notepad++, NoMacs (image viewer), Espanso (text expander), qBittorrent, Inkscape

    Android: FairEmail or K9 Mail, Authenticator Pro, Feeder, F-Droid, Pocket Casts, SD Maid

    Multi-platform: Home Assistant, Wireguard, Syncthing, Jellyfin, Kodi, Samba, Firefox

    Honorable mentions that don’t have the best UX but are still hugely appreciated for existing: Joplin, QGIS

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll take LibreOffice Writer over MS Word anytime. All that ‘I know better than you,’ ‘You wanted to copy the space, too, right? Even though you stopped marking before it,’ can kiss my ass.

  • Anthony Lavado@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks for the praise! We’re not on Lemmy too much, but someone in the Core Team caught site of this and shared it with me. If you’re wondering who I am: github

    • cujo@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Listen, I love GIMP. I would never try to argue that the UI/UX is better than alternatives. There’s a reason it’s not the defacto tool to use in its industry, and it’s not the name.

      That said, if you take the time to learn GIMP, it’s delightful. I personally like using GIMP more than, say, Photoshop, but I also learned photo manipulation on GIMP, and didn’t touch Photoshop until well after. GIMP’s UX leaves a lot to be desired for a newcomer to the software.

  • sonnenzeit@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Librera Reader is a PDF // ebook reader for Android. It has a very smooth user experience and useful options. I used to have 5 or so different PDF readers installed and would pick and choose according to the task at hand but now I’m down to just 1.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    LibreOffice, I’m not sure it’s better than M$Office per se, but it does everything most people need it to.

    Chocolatey GUI > Microsoft store

    Inkscape, I’m not even sure what the proprietary version is?

    • Gerbler@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One thing that I hate about VLC (hasn’t made me drop it in 15 years but alas) is that you can hit E to go forward one frame but there’s no key (nor capacity to set your own) to go back one frame.

      Is it a niche use case? Sure probably. But not having the option to set one myself kills me whenever I frameskip one too far and have to shift-left and mash E again.

      • _number8_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        i don’t think it’s a niche feature, and totally agree, very annoying. there’s some long technical explanation about like stream buffering but i don’t care, many other players have it. you can rewind but not rewind 1 frame?

      • 2ncs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        From what I recall it has to do with encoding and how the data stored references the following frame but not previous. Still seems like some engineering could be done to solve, so it it’s not as simple as “current Frame–”

    • madthumbs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      VLC is heavily bloated with features you need a guide to use (may as well use a command line tool if you need to refer to a guide every time). It crashes (or did about 2 years ago) some of our Linux systems. MPV spanks the piss out of it.

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Emacs and vim are both vastly superior to all other text editors.

    Which one you like better is a matter of taste.

    Vim is a girlfriend with rock hard abs who wants to take you rock climbing and of whom you’re secretly a little scared.

    Emacs is a big bouncy happy girl who wants to take care of you in every conceivable way, then split a bucket of RAM while binging pirated movies.