• SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Both wrong.

    It’s just a process. Find evidence, make theories. Find more evidence, adjust theories or replace them.

    People gotta stop injecting their religious beliefs about “the truth” or “socialism” or whatever into science. These are just your personal beliefs and science don’t give a shit about any of that.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The Big Bang Theory has that silly name because it’s what people trying to discredit it termed it.

        There’s bias in everything, but empirical evidence wins out in the end.

        • Cadenza@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Empirical evidence wins out in the end but… it’s not that simple. One name said a lot about this : Thomas Kuhn. Try giving The structure of scientific revolutions a read whenever you can. It’s old and there are more contemporary work, but Kuhn is still a reference in epistemology.