CEO of Tesla and acting President-elect Musk is going on a neo-Nazi binge endorsing far right candidates instead of properly running the companies he’s involved in such as Tesla.

In addition Tesla is considered one of the most unreliable car brands according to: https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-placed-bottom-consumer-reports-reliability-rankings/

Moreover Tesla has the highest fatal accident rates of all car brands according to: https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a62919131/tesla-has-highest-fatal-accident-rate-of-all-auto-brands-study/

Also there are privacy implications with using a car that could in theory spy on you: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2023/05/massive-trove-of-tesla-files-contains-thousands-of-safety-complaints/

Now that more competent and establish brands are making EVs there’s no reason to buy a Tesla if you want an EV. I’m not here to recommend another brand, I’m just here to tell you that your next EV should be anything other than a Tesla.

  • houseofleft@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t have any data, but I’m surprised if a new electric is worse than a second hand ICE? What’s your thinking behind that?

    • Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Reduce, reuse, recycle. Better to use a car that’s already made then to make a new one.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The second hand ICE keeps you buying new fuel though. With the EV, depending on location, most of your “fuel” is wind and sunshine, maybe nuclear.

        With cars, you can’t really compare the production alone, they pollute way more after the fact.

      • houseofleft@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That sort of makes sense, but then cars aren’t stand alone things, they actively consume to travel. I guess it’s a case of how much CO2 (I’m assuming we’re ignoring other environment impact for now) is used in manufacture vs driving?

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        You would think that’s true but after 50,000KM or so that new car is now essentially carbon neutral, while that old car is still puffing out co2