I thought I’ll make this thread for all of you out there who have questions but are afraid to ask them. This is your chance!

I’ll try my best to answer any questions here, but I hope others in the community will contribute too!

  • DosDude👾@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Is there a way to remove having to enter my password for everything?

    Wake computer from Screensaver? Password.
    Install something? Password.
    Updates (biggest one. Updates should in my opinion just work without, because being up to date is important for security reasons)? Password.

    I understand sudo needs a password,but all the other stuff I just want off. The frequency is rediculous. I don’t ever leave my house with my computer, and I don’t want to enter a password for my wife everytime she wants to use it.

  • starman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    On Android, when an app needs something like camera or location or whatever, you have to give it permission. Why isn’t there something like this on Linux desktop? Or at least not by default when you install something through package manager.

    • macniel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sandboxing wasn’t considered during development of Linux. But recent development incorporates this practice and can be found for example in flatpaks.

  • stammi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Thank you for this nice thread! My question: what is Wayland all about? Why would I want to use it and not any of the older alternatives?

    • macniel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Don’t try to shave. Use hair removal creams instead. You get longer lasting results and the skin is actually free from hair stubbles.

      I have 6 pairs.

  • sag@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Why in Linux, Software uses a particular version of a library? Why not just say it’s dependent on that library regardless of version? It become pain in ass when you are using an ancient software it required old version of newer library so you have to create symlinks of every library to match old version.

    I know that sometimes newer version of Library is not compatible with software but still. And what we can do as a software developer to fix this problem? Or as a end user.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Software changes. Version 0.5 will not have the same features as Version 0.9 most of the time. Features get added over time, features get removed over time and the interface of a library might change over time too.

      As a software dev, the only thing you can do is keep the same API for ever, but that is not always feasible.

      • sag@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hey, Thanks I have one more question. Is it possible to ship all required library with software?

        • Bienenvolk@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          That is possible indeed! For more context, you can look up “static linking vs dynamic linking”

          Tldr: Static linking: all dependencies get baked into the final binary Dynamic linking: the binary searches for libraries in your system’s PATH and loads them dynamically at runtime

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why does it feel that Linux infighting is the main reason why it never takes off? It’s always “distro X sucks”, “installing from Y is stupid”, “any system running Z should burn”

    • msch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It did take off, just not so much on the Desktop. I think those infights are really just opinions and part of further development. Having choices might be a great part of the overall success.