• OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    When one side is committing genocide and the other side wants no genocide, you don’t pick the middle and support half-genocide.

    • ReCursing@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      22 hours ago

      More accurate would be “Committing genocide” and “Wants to commit genocide but doesn’t have the guns”, with the majority of the actual population on both sides (rather than the politicians and emboldened extremists) just wanting to not be genocided. Personally I’m picking the “chuck the politicians in a hole and let the people live” option. No idea what the ideal solution looks like but I feel like getting the fascists and religious extremists on both sides out of the equation would be a good starting point

      • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Hamas wouldn’t exist if Israel didn’t commit genocide. You can’t win a war on terror. You can stop “terrorists” without hurting a single person though.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yes, an Israeli government that recognizes Palestinians as people is the first step then hoping the olive branch extends to the other side

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Just have to love that you get downvoted for this. Delusional people here as if Hamas would not murder them all. What they had in their constitution does not matter, because they are ignorant.