MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agoWell, I guess that settles itlemmy.todayimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1642arrow-down122
arrow-up1620arrow-down1imageWell, I guess that settles itlemmy.todayMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square95fedilink
minus-squareLifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-24 hours agoWell then define non-combatants. The person he shot was at fault for hundreds if not thousands of deaths. Saying he didn’t personally do them would be like saying a general is not responsible for their troops actions.
minus-squareTheRealKuni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 hours ago Well then define non-combatants. “a person who is not engaged in fighting during a war, especially a civilian, chaplain, or medical practitioner.” Sure he was responsible for deaths due to denying health coverage. But he’s still a civilian.
minus-squareLifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·23 minutes agoSo it was a civilian on civilian kill. Not a militant group/gang/mercenary. If the “battle” was pertaining to healthcare denials, he was currently battling and his group took up battle after he was gone.
Well then define non-combatants. The person he shot was at fault for hundreds if not thousands of deaths. Saying he didn’t personally do them would be like saying a general is not responsible for their troops actions.
“a person who is not engaged in fighting during a war, especially a civilian, chaplain, or medical practitioner.”
Sure he was responsible for deaths due to denying health coverage. But he’s still a civilian.
So it was a civilian on civilian kill. Not a militant group/gang/mercenary.
If the “battle” was pertaining to healthcare denials, he was currently battling and his group took up battle after he was gone.